Misplaced Pages

Talk:Working terrier: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:51, 4 January 2007 editMikeHobday (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers3,091 edits Discussion of disputed edit← Previous edit Revision as of 14:11, 4 January 2007 edit undoPBurns3711 (talk | contribs)254 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
*and added verifiable information: that hunting with terriers is largely illegal in Britain, how that came to be and what the law says *and added verifiable information: that hunting with terriers is largely illegal in Britain, how that came to be and what the law says
Perhaps concerns could be discussed here? ] 07:51, 4 January 2007 (UTC) Perhaps concerns could be discussed here? ] 07:51, 4 January 2007 (UTC)


Hobday has gone all over wikipedia spreading his animal rights advocacy and it is not needed here. This post is about working terriers and not about a specific law in a specific country. As to the question of whether terrier work in humane or whether fox are at historical record populations in the UK, perhaps he should read "Running With the Fox" by David MacDonald, who is the UK best red fox biologist. The book is widely available, and in it MacDonald notes that "If hunting stopped, the same number of foxes, or even more, would be killed by people using other methods such as traps, poison, snares or night-shooting," as most fox that are purposely terminated in the UK are on bird-shoot estates where the fox is in direct competition with the "excess" birds released into the wild. As MacDonald notes, hunters are willing to pay £10 a bird -- fox are not.

Revision as of 14:11, 4 January 2007

WikiProject iconDogs Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Dogs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Canidae and commonly referred to as "dogs" and of which the domestic dog is but one of its many members, on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DogsWikipedia:WikiProject DogsTemplate:WikiProject DogsDogs
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Dogs To-do:

Here are some tasks you can do to help with WikiProject Dogs:

Disputed edits

It is not clear what user:PBurns3711 objects to in my edit:

  • I removed claims that were not verified - that hunting with terriers is humane, and that the UK red fox population is at a high;
  • and added verifiable information: that hunting with terriers is largely illegal in Britain, how that came to be and what the law says

Perhaps concerns could be discussed here? MikeHobday 07:51, 4 January 2007 (UTC)


Hobday has gone all over wikipedia spreading his animal rights advocacy and it is not needed here. This post is about working terriers and not about a specific law in a specific country. As to the question of whether terrier work in humane or whether fox are at historical record populations in the UK, perhaps he should read "Running With the Fox" by David MacDonald, who is the UK best red fox biologist. The book is widely available, and in it MacDonald notes that "If hunting stopped, the same number of foxes, or even more, would be killed by people using other methods such as traps, poison, snares or night-shooting," as most fox that are purposely terminated in the UK are on bird-shoot estates where the fox is in direct competition with the "excess" birds released into the wild. As MacDonald notes, hunters are willing to pay £10 a bird -- fox are not.

Categories:
Talk:Working terrier: Difference between revisions Add topic