This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Toddst1 (talk | contribs) at 04:29, 9 September 2022 (→September 2022: arbmac). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:29, 9 September 2022 by Toddst1 (talk | contribs) (→September 2022: arbmac)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
April 2018
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Edi Rama has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Edi Rama was changed by Albwiki001 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.897078 on 2018-04-04T14:18:48+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:18, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
August 2022
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Please do NOT refer to other editors as "Rama's minions". Drmies (talk) 15:44, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Drmies (talk) 00:59, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
September 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Misplaced Pages without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Sali Berisha. Toddst1 (talk) 04:27, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
ARBMAC
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Balkans or Eastern Europe. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.