Misplaced Pages

Template talk:Infobox scientist

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jähmefyysikko (talk | contribs) at 18:30, 14 October 2023 (→Add Google Scholar Entry: Edit comm). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 18:30, 14 October 2023 by Jähmefyysikko (talk | contribs) (→Add Google Scholar Entry: Edit comm)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Template:Infobox scientist is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.

Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases.


This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Infobox scientist template.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10Auto-archiving period: 4 months 
This template does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
WikiProject iconBiography: Science and Academia
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This template is supported by the science and academia work group.
WikiProject iconHistory of Science
WikiProject iconThis template is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can edit the template attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science
WikiProject iconScience
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience
WikiProject iconPhysics: History
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
This template is supported by History Taskforce.
WikiProject iconPlants
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
WikiProject iconInfoboxes
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Infoboxes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Infoboxes on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InfoboxesWikipedia:WikiProject InfoboxesTemplate:WikiProject InfoboxesInfoboxes
Articles for deletionThis template was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
  • No consensus to merge, 2020 March 19, see discussion.
  • No consensus, 2006 September 8, see discussion.

Request

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please wrap the |footnotes= output in {{Center}} to center the tags within the bottom. BhamBoi (talk) 06:40, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit template-protected}} template. You have not given a reason for why the footnotes should be centred, and I cannot think of a compelling reason to do so. Primefac (talk) 10:10, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Don't think this improves the "Notes" section. Tested both the template and the div style in the sandbox here and here, but in both cases the "Notes" caption was forced to appear even when there were no footnotes, and the existing footnotes looked odd due to the centering effect. Even if the "Notes" caption could somehow be subdued when there are no footnotes, I would have to oppose this change. P.I. Ellsworth , ed.  13:46, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
I just think it looks better (see Template:Infobox government agency use on Hawaiian Volcano Observatory) BhamBoi (talk) 17:05, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
It might look a little better when the footnotes are enclosed in <ref></ref> tags, but I think it looks weird when the footnotes are written out, like they are on this template's test cases page. P.I. Ellsworth , ed.  17:19, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
What I had envisioned was exactly the way they are set out in the HVO article. See Draft:Kiguma Jack Murata where they are not centered, using this infobox. BhamBoi (talk) 17:25, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Using template wrapper

This template currently calls Template:Infobox person manually. For every parameter that is desired, an editor needs to:

I propose that we can enable all parameters currently Template:Infobox person for this while simplifying the code for the template, by using Module:Template wrapper (currently in the sandbox). This proposed change does not alter existing infoboxes: the appearance, warning messages, and error tracking categories remain the same. It just enables any parameter in Template:Infobox person to be used, with correct error checking. Further, if a parameter gets added to Template:Infobox person in the future, it will be inherited by Template:Infobox scientist without more editor intervention. The information box at the top of Template:Infobox scientist/doc will be updated to tell editors that any Infobox person parameter works.

What do editors think of this proposal? — hike395 (talk) 10:33, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

 Implemented --- no objections after 7 days. — hike395 (talk) 10:58, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Request to add a "Notable works" parameter

I request that a Notable works parameter be added to separate a subject's publications from being parsed into the "Known For" parameter. GuardianH (talk) 16:06, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Influences/influenced

I propose to remove these highly questionable infobox parameters that usually have unsourced lists never mentioned in the main text. The same change was done for Infobox philosopher, see discussion there. Artem.G (talk) 20:01, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

  • Support A successful scientific theory influences all that come after. Thus it does not seem like a good way of relating people. For a bad example of usage of both fields, see Albert Einstein. --Jähmefyysikko (talk) 18:49, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Oppose as I don't think the Albert Einstein page should be used as a model. Please give a few more examples of less notable scientists, you might persuade me to change my mind. I do not remember seeing that much abuse of those infoboxes. Ldm1954 (talk) 19:40, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Comment I agre with Ldm1954, I do not see that much misuse. I have seen maybe a couple of articles that use it and those were not necessarily wrong.--ReyHahn (talk) 19:54, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Examples of usage (feel free to add more under here):
Influences: Sadi Carnot, Rudolf Clausius, Julius von Mayer, James Joule, Humphry Davy. Here I would agree with Carnot as being a major influence, as Kelvin was basically a fan of his. Clausius was a contemporary and there was a more complicated interplay between them. The influence from the rest is mentioned in the text, but in the infobox we lose the context.
Influenced: Andrew Gray. He was Kelvin's assistant, published his collected scientific works, succeeded his chair, and continued his electromagnetic research. 'Influenced' is a mild way of putting it. But why include only this one person, since Kelvin's influence on various fields of physics was huge? Jähmefyysikko (talk) 20:19, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
This does not look like abuse/fluff to me. Bardeen has one name, Schroedonger none, Heisenberg three. Let sleeping dogs lie, I remain opposed. Ldm1954 (talk) 20:27, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
In Bardeen's case the 'influence' from Van Vleck is that Bardeen was his student and later recruited him. It is a significant connection between two nobelists, but one could also use the field Other academic advisors, which would be symmetric with Van Vleck page where Bardeen is listed as Other notable students. The people Heisenberg influenced were Döpel and von Weizsäcker. Von Weizsäcker was advised by Heisenberg (according to article), and can be included in the infobox under more accurate field. In Döpel's case 'influence' seems to mean that they collaborated in academia, and worked together in Uranverein. It is a very ambiguous field. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 21:17, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
another examples are Newton and von Neumann. Artem.G (talk) 21:40, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Comment. The removal of the field from {{infobox philosopher}} creates a strange situation in which the incluences between scientists and philosophers are still listed, even though they are not allowed between philosophers. An example is Hermann von Helmholtz. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 21:29, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Support – important influences can and should be explained in the lead/body. An infobox list of names without context gives absolutely no clear information and if anything gives the dangerously free ability for readers to interpret "influence" however they want. An infobox should be for simple, straight forward information that stands on its on. – Aza24 (talk) 00:49, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Support - In consistency with the philosopher infobox and anticipation of any potential overlap; while this one may be less historically prone to abuse, I still don't really see any good reason to have it. - car chasm (talk) 18:23, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Probably too late, but oppose. If I had known that this discussion existed I would have said much the same as Ldm1954. I have never seen these entries abused, and I should like to see some examples of abuses. Athel cb (talk) 13:52, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

minus Removed The "influenced"/"influences" fields will now disappear from the infoboxes. Articles which use them will appear in Category:Pages using infobox scientist with unknown parameters. — hike395 (talk) 23:44, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Add Google Scholar Entry

I suggest adding an entry that would look a bit like (for Einstein)

Google Scholar H-factor 125

where the "H-factor" would be automatically updated from Google Scholar. (I am not sure how to do that in whatever markup is used within WP, but it should be possible.) Ldm1954 (talk) 11:09, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

As far as I know, there is no way to automatically scrape an external website from en WP (or the other language WPs). From what I've seen, someone needs to set up a scraping/importation script into Wikidata, then it can be gotten from there. Unfortunately, h-index is a dynamic quantity, so it's probably not appropriate for infrequent importation. (There are also well-known issues with h-index, which makes it somewhat problematic to enshrine into an infobox).
However, a link to a scientist's Google Scholar page seems like it could be very useful. What do other editors think? — hike395 (talk) 17:30, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
For reference there is a 2016 page on stack exchange here. You would just cron it weekly. Concerning issues, I am not excited by the paper you mention. There are others, but it is way better than nothing. Ldm1954 (talk) 18:06, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
I have not yet formed an opinion, but Google Scholar is already included (although almost hidden) in the template {{Authority control}} that is placed at the bottom of the page. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 18:22, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
Template talk:Infobox scientist Add topic