Misplaced Pages

User talk:KillerChihuahua

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dduff442 (talk | contribs) at 21:49, 9 December 2009 (WMC: You threatened to block me). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 21:49, 9 December 2009 by Dduff442 (talk | contribs) (WMC: You threatened to block me)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Userpage | talk | contribs | sandbox | e-mail | shiny stuff 11:41 pm, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
This is a Misplaced Pages user discussion page.

This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:KillerChihuahua.

Wikimedia Foundation
Wikimedia Foundation
Talk to the Puppy
To leave a message on this page, click here.
If you email me, be aware that even if I am actively editing, I cannot always access my email and it may be a day or two before you receive a reply.
If you message me on this page, I will probably reply on this page. If I messaged you on your page, please reply there.

*Post new messages to the bottom of my talk page.
*Comment about the content of a specific article on the Talk: page of that article, and not here.
*Sign your post using four tildes ( ~~~~ )

24 - 23 - 22 - 21 - 20 -19 - 18 -17 - 16 -15 - 14 -13 -12 -11 - 10 - 9 - 8 - 7 - 6 - 5 -4 - 3 - 2 - 1 - Archives

  • Two years ago this January

And I still see people ranking their personal interpretation of WP:CIVIL above everything else. Above NPOV. Above V. Above NOR.

Oh wait, those are the Simplified Ruleset, aren't they? The basis for all of Misplaced Pages?

Silly me. Here I thought we were here to write an encyclopedia, and that while a civil environment furthers that aim, the Civility Police are generally counter-indicated by the chilling effect and escalation to which their actions usually lead.


FACs needing feedback
edit
Lady in the Lake trial Review it now
Operation Winter Storm Review it now
Lord of Rings: Middle-earth II Review it now
Sozin's Comet: The Final Battle Review it now
Operation Brevity Review it now
Northern Bald Ibis Review it now
Edgar Speyer Review it now
USS Iowa (BB-61) Review it now
Greece Runestones Review it now
The Swimming Hole Review it now
Michael Tritter Review it now
Alaska class cruiser Review it now
TS Keith Review it now
Mother's Milk Review it now

ANI Notice

Hello, KillerChihuahua. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Collectonian (talkcontribs) 22:33, 20 September 2009

I saw that you'd done a ton of work on the Infernal Bridegroom Productions page...

...and wondered if some info I came across should be added. Jason Nodler and Tamarie Cooper have a new theatre company in Houston called The Catastrophic Theatre. It doesn't have a WP page as yet, and I considered adding a line on the IBP page about the new company, but wasn't feeling bold enough, being only a lowly wikisloth. Please let me know what you think. I'll look for your answer here. Thanks! ~ zerodark | talk 06:14, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Intriguing. I cannot find a third party source other than 29-95. Have you any other sources? KillerChihuahuaAdvice 22:03, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Love ya sweetie...

...but not that way ;-).

(Dunno if you're following that particular drama, so thought you should know why your ears are burning). --SB_Johnny |  23:21, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Wow. Maybe that case is worth watchlisting after all... MastCell  23:27, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Goatherd woos small dog. Film at 11 ;-). --SB_Johnny |  00:11, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Dear me... This place is fraught with unexpected ... err... Information. KillerChihuahuaAdvice 15:09, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Happy KillerChihuahua's Day!

User:KillerChihuahua has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as KillerChihuahua's day!
For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,
enjoy being the Star of the day, dear KillerChihuahua!

Peace,
Rlevse
00:59, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — RlevseTalk00:59, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Congrats! Shell 01:10, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
A Well Deserved Honor - 'Grats! Jusdafax 01:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Wow, thank you very much! This comes at a good time for me, too. I have been a little discouraged recently. KillerChihuahuaAdvice 14:53, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Sorry to hear that last part. I admit I'm a little discouraged myself (it appears my only Thanksgiving dinner tomorrow will be a turkey sandwich at Subway), but I guess we just have to keep plugging along. And glad to see you got a day today! Heimstern Läufer (talk) 15:27, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Hey, you're welcome to join me for Thanksgiving. I'm going to the Trilateral Commission's secret volcanic lair for turkey, beer, and football. I was invited by Pfizer to thank me for all of my hard work suppressing cheap, natural cancer cures on Misplaced Pages. The secret ingredient in the gravy is eeeevil. MastCell  17:10, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Yippee! Jehochman 16:39, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Great Hippocampus Question
Congratulations! Good to hear the first part, hope the encouragement succeeds. Am fair wore out with all this Darwinning myself, puppy day makes a nice afterlude. So, all the best for the coming year! . . dave souza, talk 16:44, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
I am not hosting turkeyday myself this year, but I am making pumpkin cheesecake and descending on friends. :-D
I am sorry to hear your day will be a sandwich, Heimie, but hope the sandwich is good and your day is happy anyway. Still much better than a day with no sandwich, as so many in this world have. Mastcell: sources? Video? You're making this up, false authority syndrome reigns. KillerChihuahuaAdvice 18:30, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
You should pop up here for lunch: I'm making my famous smothered goat cubes, and the wife is making her famous butternut squash bread ;-). --SB_Johnny |  18:57, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Sounds yummy, but your wife might object. Does she know we've been having an affair? KillerChihuahuaAdvice 19:02, 25 November 2009 (UTC)u
Well, I was assuming you wouldn't bring that up ;-). --SB_Johnny |  19:04, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Well I didn't even know about it until you put that link on my talk page! Now that I've been told, I can hardly un-know. This is all your fault. The romance is over. Over, I tell you! KillerChihuahuaAdvice 20:59, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Awwwwww, just when we were getting the popcorn ready. Puts B.B. King's "The Thrill is Gone" on the music player :-( . . . dave souza, talk 21:25, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
*sigh*. Well, we'll always have Wasilla :-/. --SB_Johnny |  21:54, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
LOL! KillerChihuahuaAdvice 22:10, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
I heard some laughter ... all the way over there. Coming here to find out what it's about. Oh, nice. Congratulations! :) Proofreader77 (talk) 22:23, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Disruption by Ed Poor at his conflict of interest

You had previously given Ed Poor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) this warning: Ed, I'm not going to play your games. You've been warned; watch your step on Moon and Unification related articles. I will not hesitate to block if you continue to disrupt. Puppy has spoken; puppy is done.

Ed Poor has continued to engage in disruption at articles directly in his conflict of interest; namely attempting to remove info linking related organizations and front groups to the Unification Church and Sun Myung Moon, removing sourced information, and making disruptive page moves against consensus. Please see and for two recent examples. Enough warnings have been given at this point. Thoughts? Cirt (talk) 02:38, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Ayers

Hi, I essentially restored to my previous edit of Ayers, but added a citation. AFAIK there has been no discussion on the talk page regarding this since my last post, and I missed that someone removed my edit. I think my version should stand as factually accurate, cited, and npov, but I posted at talk in any case. Best, Kaisershatner (talk) 19:09, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

thanks, and hopefully this will be easily resolved. :-) KillerChihuahuaAdvice 19:10, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

WMC

I willingly dropped the issue officially here: old ver , diff: .

Only message after this was to Alexh19740110 to tell him I didn't share his views about AGW until Connolley marginalised the third party interventions (following diff) and then re-opened the conversation without further prompting from me . Look at the succeeding edits and diffs to see who was driving the conversation. Dduff442 (talk) 20:25, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

why are you here? What do you want from me? KillerChihuahuaAdvice 20:27, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
I just don't understand how actions carried out at WMC's prompting could constitute harassment. Dduff442 (talk) 20:29, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
He did not come to your talk page and ask you questions. He was attempting to respond to your highly confusing posts on his page. Kudos to him. Why are you here? Are you unclear on how you were harassing him? KillerChihuahuaAdvice 20:33, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
I don't share your opinion regarding his motivations in re-opening the debate or regarding the confusing posts. It's quite out of character of him to indulge enquiries he considers trivial. The entry was entitled 'an offer' and there was only one offer in the message... I think anyone with average intelligence could work that out. I'm unclear how it's *possible* to harass someone at their own volition, so yes. I'm here to answer your questions. Dduff442 (talk) 20:39, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

I'm not asking any. I had one, "why are you here" and your answer is "to answer your questions" - this is circular. Looks like we have nothing to discuss. KillerChihuahuaAdvice 21:14, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Well you threatened me with a block for harassment. Now you agree no harassment occurred are you not embarrassed at all? Dduff442 (talk) 21:49, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
User talk:KillerChihuahua Add topic