Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Radiopathy (talk | contribs) at 03:17, 21 February 2010 (→George Harrison). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

December 2009

Message from 75.4.202.97

Thank you for explaining what was behind that comment by that gentleman. I don't want to use any names and I didn't want to put this on the talk page where you put your message because others might match it up easily. Please delete this message from your talk page as soon as you read it. I don’t know how to phrase what I want to say. I am concerned who might read it, but here goes. His thought process concerns me. Should I be concerned about my safety? Has anything happened to anyone he has felt threatened by or anyone he has disagreed with? Would you advise closing my account on Misplaced Pages? Any other thoughts? Please do not mention his name in replying. Thank you..--75.4.202.97 (talk) 03:26, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Please Pleas Me

Just because it is remastered doesn't make it a different album. All releases of the album after the first are re-releases. McLerristarr (talk) 03:41, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

moved to poster's talk

Album infoboxes

More informative I tried to make the infoboxes more informative by listing the location where the album was recorded. I personally dislike the arbitrary line breaks, but I'm ultimately indifferent to them. Please review this revert; you may wish to be more careful in the future. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:41, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry

Fred the Osyter and Dayewalker are socks. The individual is using socks to win the edit war with myself and avoid 3RR violation. No sufficient explanation has been offered as to why my contribution is unacceptable. Even if my edit were wrong, that doesn't excuse the sockpuppetry. Consider the fact that both accounts are editing the same article with the same agenda, and both have misspelled "lead as "lede" both in the edit summary and on my talk page. I would like action to be taken, preferably in the form of a Sockpuppet investigation. 85.210.175.63 (talk) 21:18, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

IP85, why don't you register an account? Then you can file the sockpuppet report yourself, if you feel there's some kind of sockpuppet effort against you. Dayewalker (talk) 21:35, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Stopping

Please don't Your note on my talk was simply rude and uncivil. Your edit summary claiming that I was trolling is patently false. I fail to see how converting HTML elements and applying WP:DASH is in any way petulant or disruptive; as such, I have no plans to stop. Also, your edits to Hollie Steel are breaking the template, so they should be fixed. If you want to discuss something with me civilly, I would be happy to do so. If you continue with your aggressive and rude behavior (this includes your inappropriate addition to Talk:Remain in Light), I will report your behavior to WP:AN/I. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:55, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Hounding I have never directly encountered this before, but I think your recent edits to Talk:Remain in Light and User talk:Hiding constitute "wikihounding". Your (mis)characterization of my edits appears to be for the sole purpose of undermining anything constructive that I am trying to do on the related pages. This is the final straw for me, as I think that your behavior is tantamount to harassment and is made in bad faith. If I see you persisting in this manner (behind my back, for exclusively defamatory purposes), I will not hesitate to post to the appropriate part of WP:AN, as you are apparently unwilling to discuss with me directly. If there is anything that you have to say to me on this topic, I suggest you post to my talk.

For what it is worth, I also think you should review Misplaced Pages:UKNATIONALS, as it makes no mention of infoboxes, nor whether or not England can be declared a part of the UK, and is furthermore an "essay contain the advice or opinions of one or more Misplaced Pages contributors, may represent widespread norms or minority viewpoints. Consider these views with discretion." Rather than a policy, guideline, or even the instructions on a template, which are exactly what I am citing in my favor for including references to the United Kingdom in George Orwell and Snow Patrol.

To sum up: your edits regarding my behavior and posts to my talk do not appear to conform to the standards of etiquette on Misplaced Pages. If I see you posting more slanderous references to me, blind reverting of my edits, edit summaries which call my legitimate edits "trolling" or "vandalism" or any other improper behavior, I will resort to taking this dispute to an admin, as you are unwilling or unable to discuss with me directly. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:06, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

1RR violation

You violated your 1RR restriction on Hollie Steel. I am not blocking you in this instance, but if such violations continue you are likely to be blocked and your 1RR restriction extended further. Hopefully you'll avoid that by discussing on the talk page, instead of edit-warring. Abecedare (talk) 03:20, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

I have been trying to stay away from you,

But you make that difficult when you edit war against me on someone else's talk page. If they wish to revert my edit, they may, but not you.— Dædαlus 05:04, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Humour, Daed. I knew what the email was about. I think you do a lot of good work here, and I'm open to communicating with you. Our exchange about the SPI issue on Gwen Gale's talk page was very civil, and I see no reason for it to not continue that way. Radiopathy •talk• 07:06, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

And you had no reason revert my edit. Please do not do it again. I report people who break policy, and any restrictions on their edits that they violated. If I am civil with someone, I am civil with that person. That doesn't mean I won't report them, however.— Dædαlus 08:14, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

1RR/3RR

As I said I warned you about this earlier and I felt compelled to act now. Your post to AN/I has been ignored and archived, so I am continuing on with a 1RR violation here: Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Radiopathy_reported_by_User:Koavf_.28Result:_.29. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:16, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Aidan Davis

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Aidan Davis. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Misplaced Pages:Notability and "What Misplaced Pages is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Aidan Davis. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

George Harrison

Hi, "vandalism" is when a user goes around inserting "poo poo" into articles. In this case the anon brought a source that can be easily misread and insists on reinserting the erroneous interpretation without discussion. That is a content dispute even if the anon behaves badly with respect to it. Anyway, the article is now semi-protected for one day to cool the anon down a bit. After that if it still insists on inserting material without discussion, I will block it for edit-warring. And watch the 3RR rule yourself; since this is not strictly vandalism you can't just keep reverting. Ask me or another admin to help and I will. Cheers. Zero 03:14, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Understood. Radiopathy •talk• 03:17, 21 February 2010 (UTC)