This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jeppiz (talk | contribs) at 16:01, 21 February 2013 (→Edit warring: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:01, 21 February 2013 by Jeppiz (talk | contribs) (→Edit warring: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)October 2012
Hello, I'm Jprg1966. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Vancouver Island marmot, because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Jprg1966 17:20, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
Hello, Strangesad. You have new messages at Jprg1966's talk page.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Strangesad, you are invited to the Teahouse
Hi Strangesad! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Please join other people who edit Misplaced Pages at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Misplaced Pages where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:21, 27 October 2012 (UTC) |
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Hello, Strangesad. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Mediran
Your submission at Articles for creation
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Echo (Elephant).
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 15:33, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
WP:RS
Hi, sorry, did not want to get on your nerves, but those websites are not WP:RS in general and also subject to WP:LINKROT, so books by good publishers are better. Your statement was, however, correct. But per WP:V correct means very little and sources rule. I added an RS source anyway, and made it 4 pagars per WP:LEDE. History2007 (talk) 00:39, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- My sources seem reliable to me. Can you explain what's wrong with them? Yours, which I just found on google books, is about the literary and philosophical treatment of resurrection. Not the definition or actual possibility of resurrection. Strangesad (talk) 00:44, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- All the book needs to say is that there are views which say it is impossible. So we actually agree on what there is to say, the question is attribution. www.uniformlaws.org is not RS for sure, given n publisher. NHS.UK is a medical site and using it is WP:OR given no mention of resurrection, etc. And they are all LINKROT items that may change tomorrow. The book I used was about Resurection. You can ask for further views on WP:RSN if you like. That is the easiest way. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 00:51, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
For your information
Discussion of your practices Jeppiz (talk) 10:51, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
Edit warring
You are currently involved in heavy edit warring at Resurrection of Jesus. Five different users have all spoken out against your proposed introduction, nobody has spoken for it. Despite this consensus, you continue to edit war and revert to your suggestion version for the fifth time. Please stopJeppiz (talk) 16:01, 21 February 2013 (UTC)