Misplaced Pages

Talk:Battle of Chawinda

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cinderella157 (talk | contribs) at 03:27, 30 August 2024 (Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 June 2024: c). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 03:27, 30 August 2024 by Cinderella157 (talk | contribs) (Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 June 2024: c)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Chawinda article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 12 months 
This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconIndia: History High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
Note icon
This article was last assessed in May 2012.
WikiProject iconPakistan Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Pakistani history.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Asian / Indian / South Asia
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
B checklist
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation: criterion met
  2. Coverage and accuracy: criterion met
  3. Structure: criterion not met
  4. Grammar and style: criterion met
  5. Supporting materials: criterion not met
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Asian military history task force
Taskforce icon
Indian military history task force
Taskforce icon
South Asian military history task force


RFC on the Result - Pakistani Victory/Indian defeat

RfC started by a ban evading sock, closing it per WP:DENY. Aman Kumar Goel 20:33, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


As already mentioned, an RFC concluded that it was a Pakistani Victory. The decision was further reviewed and consensus was once again in favor of the RFC - Pakistani Victory.

The participants of this short talk page discussion concluded the battle was inconclusive.

Should the result of the Battle of Chawinda be "Pakistani Victory" or "Indian defeat"? Joooshhh (talk) 19:29, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

  • Pakistani Victory It's cut and dry - as the reliable sources state - the Indians failed to attack, the Pakistanis successful defended themselves. Joooshhh (talk) 19:58, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
  • Close RfC This seems ridiculous to make an RfC after a block evading IP created one a few weeks prior and now an account with 17 edits on a page that is ECP? This does not seem like the correct protocol. – The Grid (talk) 22:12, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 December 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add the following sections

==Other 1971 battles in the vicinity==
== See also ==

Thank you. 119.74.238.54 (talk) 03:53, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made.  Spintendo  04:32, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 June 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add the following item in the "See also" section:

 Partly done, put it in the further reading section instead. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 02:26, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Kingsmasher678, the navbox and sidebar already have these battles. Consequently, the addition of these to either further reading or see also is redundant. The added links are also mentioned in the article text. Cinderella157 (talk) 03:27, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
Talk:Battle of Chawinda Add topic