This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Michael Hardy (talk | contribs) at 12:04, 20 September 2009 (moved Talk:Knowledge Mobilization to Talk:Knowledge mobilization). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:04, 20 September 2009 by Michael Hardy (talk | contribs) (moved Talk:Knowledge Mobilization to Talk:Knowledge mobilization)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Colleagues, Thanks for reading and contributing to this KM wiki. I have just made some small edits and additions and I have started this talk page. I am interested in seeing who is visiting and using this page. If you wish please leave your name, organizaiton and contact information (if desired) so we can learn who is part of our growing KM family.
David Phipps, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, dphipps@yorku.ca Davidphipps (talk) 18:20, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello from the KIS Project at the University of Saskatchewan! We are actually in the middle of trying to establish our own wiki for collaborative policy framework development on issues related to agriculture. I came upon this article/talk page by searching for "knowledge mobilization". I'm pleased to see that Mr. David Phipps has put up an entry. Great job!
Kathy Lang, University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada kis.project@usask.ca http://www.kis.usask.ca —Preceding unsigned comment added by Klang KIS (talk • contribs) 21:29, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Is this page on something called 'Knowledge Mobilization' a spoof? The vacuity of the statements on this page defies belief. Reinhard Wentz / London 27.05.08 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.106.8.133 (talk) 16:01, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Merge discussion
- Propose merge. The article states that Knowledge mobilization is a synonym for knowledge transfer, therefore it should be merged into that article. I don't think that this article contributes a whole lot, except that the synonym exists and is preferred by a major research organisation in Canada. Itsmejudith (talk) 11:02, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
no they should not be merged as they represent different concepts - transfer implies uni-directional sharing of knowledge (ie informing decision making) while mobilization implies using knowledge to take action (ie influencing decision making) Cohibacanuck (talk) 05:36, 12 April 2009 (UTC)