Misplaced Pages

:Requested moves/Technical requests - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requested moves

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Teflon Peter Christ (talk | contribs) at 22:55, 24 October 2014 (Requests to revert undiscussed moves). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 22:55, 24 October 2014 by Teflon Peter Christ (talk | contribs) (Requests to revert undiscussed moves)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Shortcuts

The discussion process is used for potentially controversial moves. If any of the following apply to a desired move, treat it as potentially controversial:

  • There is an existing article (not just a redirect) at the target title
  • There has been any past debate about the best title for the page
  • Someone could reasonably disagree with the move.

If a desired move is uncontroversial and technical in nature (e.g. spelling and capitalization), please feel free to move the page yourself. If the page has recently been moved without discussion, you may revert the move and initiate a discussion on its talk page. In either case, if you are unable to complete/revert the move, request it below.

{{subst:RMassist|<!--old page name, without brackets-->|<!--requested name, without brackets-->|<!--reason for move-->}}
This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Do not edit the article's talk page.
  • Alternatively, if the only obstacle to a technical move is another page in the way, you can request the other page be deleted. This applies for example if the other page is a redirect to the current title of the article to be moved, a redirect with no incoming links, or an unnecessary disambiguation page with a minor edit history. If it has a single history line, see WP:Move over redirect instead. To request the other page be deleted, add the following code to the top of the page that is in the way:
{{db-move|<!--page to be moved here-->|<!--reason for move-->}}
This will list the undesired page for deletion under criterion for speedy deletion G6. If the page is a redirect, place the code above the redirection. For a list of articles being considered for uncontroversial speedy deletion, see Category:Candidates for uncontroversial speedy deletion.

Uncontroversial technical requests

Contested technical requests

Requests to revert undiscussed moves

Requests to restore capitalization which was removed before :: best discuss this lot here
This point is also being discussed at User talk:DagosNavy#Name changes of various articles.
One cannot tell by just looking at article names. It is the content that describes specific/unique events being involved, not events in general. Hmains (talk) 03:04, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
How would you say we should handle an article about a specific, unique event, when that event is extensively covered in reliable sources, and all or most of the authors of those reliable sources seem to be comfortable writing about that event without referring to the event using a proper name? The authors of the reliable sources did not use a proper name in their writing. Should we give it a proper name? Hugh (talk) 05:42, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Editor was asked to slow down & discuss on 17 October 2014 at Talk:Chicago race riot of 1919. Hugh (talk) 17:57, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
True but the discussion there is not complete as user DagoNavy chose to remove comments he did not like. Hmains (talk) 03:16, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Many of the pages listed below are about riots. If you check Category:Riots and its subcats, you will see a lot of lower case, especially the word 'riot'. I didn't check for recent moves of any of these. EdJohnston (talk) 18:37, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
The Category:Riots itself is about types of riots so such articles and their content are correctly lower case. Proper names are those of specific/particular/unique persons, places or things (including events) so they are in the riots by country, etc., subcategories. Many of these are capitalized; some have never been capitalized (not everyone knows English rules); some are not capitalized due to user DagoNavy having started on lower casing spree in August 2014. This list I provided here is only back to Oct 1; there are many, many more that user DagoNavy did his thing on. Hmains (talk) 02:58, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the link. Informative, but it's not guideline. Hugh (talk) 03:40, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
And Guideline WP:NCCAPS links to Proper name as the go to place to determine what is a proper name. It is not up to WP editors to determine what is a proper name. It is common English. Hmains (talk) 03:49, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Agreed, "It is not up to WP editors to determine what is a proper name." Now, "common English": what is that besides what one might find in reliable sources? Hugh (talk) 14:41, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Lower-cased w/o discussion 15 October 2014‎ by
(Cross-posting from
To EdJohnston: yes they would upper cased in the article text as they are proper names and are thus capitalized everywhere. The article texts are currently lower case because user DagoNavy changed them to be so. Hmains (talk) 02:58, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
"...they are proper names and are thus capitalized everywhere." I checked the refs for Chicago race riot of 1919 and it is not capitalized everywhere. Hugh (talk) 03:40, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Comment 1st time in this forum here. My humble read of WP:NCCAPS is we should not be giving names to things, and that the way to justify using a proper noun in WP is to find the proper noun in the preponderance of RS. Checking this would be a lot of work for all these events. I looked at RS for one, Chicago Race Riot of 1919. This one could maybe go either way, but should probably be best treated as not a proper noun. Hugh (talk) 03:03, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
The first sentences in WP:NCCAPS are the only of relevance and they say always capitalize the words in a proper name. Hmains (talk) 03:20, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Right, always capitalize proper names. Now, how do we decide what has a proper name? Do reliable sources have a role? An event can be specific and not have a proper name. Hugh (talk) 03:40, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Typo in move request template? Should be Lager beer riot -> Lager Beer Riot. Hugh (talk) 17:20, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Yes, thanks for the correction. Hmains (talk) 02:58, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Corrected as requested. Hmains (talk) 19:42, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Typo in move request template? Should be Airport Homes race riots -> Airport Homes Race Riots. Hugh (talk) 17:13, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Yes, thank you for the correction. All this is not a nice task. Hmains (talk) 02:58, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
I pointed out the typos but I did not make the corrections because I am reluctant to edit your posts. I feel consensus may line up against these move requests but in the mean time you might consider correcting the templates for clarity. Hugh (talk) 16:56, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
I am correcting this one as requested Hmains (talk) 19:29, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requested moves/Technical requests Add topic