Misplaced Pages

Talk:2017 Turku attack

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rævhuld (talk | contribs) at 14:53, 18 August 2017 (No cites in the summary: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 14:53, 18 August 2017 by Rævhuld (talk | contribs) (No cites in the summary: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

No cites in the summary

Hey guys, please don't put cites in the summary. Some articles have them, but it is Misplaced Pages standard for good articles to not have cites in the summary. Just write in the article with cites and summarize if important in the summary. KR--Rævhuld (talk) 14:53, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Category:
Talk:2017 Turku attack Add topic