This account is currently blocked. (Show block details) The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:
- 14:22, 29 September 2006 Gamaliel talk contribs blocked Joehazelton talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (long-term breaches of civility and policy, sockpuppeting, legal threats, stated intention to disregard all WP policy)
4 August 2006
- 02:3702:37, 4 August 2006 diff hist +1 m Peter Roskam sp
- 02:3502:35, 4 August 2006 diff hist +595 Peter Roskam elaboration on the Suburban life debate article
- 01:5401:54, 4 August 2006 diff hist +245 User:Jahiegel fun stuff
- 01:3001:30, 4 August 2006 diff hist +1 m Peter Roskam sp
- 01:1601:16, 4 August 2006 diff hist +504 Peter Roskam revert... your explination is weak with out merit...
- 01:1401:14, 4 August 2006 diff hist +482 Talk:Peter Roskam respond to Suburban Life report.
- 00:5500:55, 4 August 2006 diff hist +504 Peter Roskam Explaination weak and application of policy inconsistant (reverted)
- 00:4600:46, 4 August 2006 diff hist +5 m User:Jahiegel corrections
- 00:4100:41, 4 August 2006 diff hist +2,201 User:Jahiegel my response
3 August 2006
- 15:5515:55, 3 August 2006 diff hist +505 Peter Roskam Important debate infromation.
- 15:2715:27, 3 August 2006 diff hist +829 Talk:Peter Roskam Gothean Please share your mysterious standards of why the
- 02:2302:23, 3 August 2006 diff hist +388 Talk:Peter Roskam Whys Suburban life article not acceptable even thou it is subject to the same standards and review as the Trib
- 02:1102:11, 3 August 2006 diff hist −2,200 Talk:Peter Roskam removed due heat of passion
- 00:5700:57, 3 August 2006 diff hist +2,201 Talk:Peter Roskam Ban me now
2 August 2006
- 19:3519:35, 2 August 2006 diff hist −145 Peter Roskam Rmoved link based on Gothena standard
- 19:3319:33, 2 August 2006 diff hist +652 Talk:Peter Roskam Respones to Goethena bias...
- 19:1919:19, 2 August 2006 diff hist −720 Peter Roskam Editorial blogger has no place here by the stands Goethen set .....
- 16:0416:04, 2 August 2006 diff hist −56 m Peter Roskam correction based on what the article actually said
- 02:5902:59, 2 August 2006 diff hist +669 Peter Roskam Adding relevant and important informaton regarding roskams debates.
- 01:3701:37, 2 August 2006 diff hist +26 m Talk:Peter Roskam sp
- 01:1801:18, 2 August 2006 diff hist +750 Talk:Peter Roskam Removal of Minutia
- 00:4900:49, 2 August 2006 diff hist −720 Peter Roskam What is this editorialized bull donkey baloney. Has no place. Bias and lacks NPOV...
1 August 2006
- 05:2205:22, 1 August 2006 diff hist +1,206 User:LoveMonkey No edit summary
- 04:5504:55, 1 August 2006 diff hist +1,203 Talk:Peter Roskam I consider this inclusion of of one small quip with the most negative spin to be VERY BIAS
31 July 2006
- 20:0620:06, 31 July 2006 diff hist +113 User talk:LoveMonkey ask a question
- 19:5719:57, 31 July 2006 diff hist +1,187 Talk:Peter Roskam Resonding to Goethean
- 19:1119:11, 31 July 2006 diff hist +130 Peter Roskam removing out of context quip... does not fully describe the issue betwee the two churchs. This small quip is included for effect not NPOV information.
- 18:5818:58, 31 July 2006 diff hist +93 m User:LoveMonkey sp
- 18:4618:46, 31 July 2006 diff hist +152 User:LoveMonkey responding
- 18:2518:25, 31 July 2006 diff hist +131 Peter Roskam Reverting what the Name calling vandel Goethean has done, Geethean edit war marches on
- 18:1618:16, 31 July 2006 diff hist +221 User talk:LoveMonkey responding
28 July 2006
- 22:3022:30, 28 July 2006 diff hist +115 m Talk:Peter Roskam No edit summary
- 22:2422:24, 28 July 2006 diff hist +132 Peter Roskam Goethen's edit war continues...(see talk)
- 22:2022:20, 28 July 2006 diff hist +661 Talk:Peter Roskam Resonding to Goethean apperent liberal point of view and advocacy
- 22:0222:02, 28 July 2006 diff hist +132 Peter Roskam its Grothean's third revet... see wiki policy
- 21:4921:49, 28 July 2006 diff hist +133 Peter Roskam revert (see talk)
- 21:0821:08, 28 July 2006 diff hist +362 Talk:Peter Roskam answer Goethean charge that Chistianity Today acceptable publication
- 20:5320:53, 28 July 2006 diff hist +3 m Talk:Peter Roskam clean up grammer
- 20:4920:49, 28 July 2006 diff hist +132 Peter Roskam Reinstated relevent information (see talk for reason)
- 20:4420:44, 28 July 2006 diff hist +573 Talk:Peter Roskam Goethens compromises is unacceptable ..which means more edit warfare on his part
- 17:5617:56, 28 July 2006 diff hist +705 Talk:Peter Roskam Suggesting a compromise to a stubborn editor
- 17:3717:37, 28 July 2006 diff hist +70 Peter Roskam Added less bias, mainstream source about the religious issues of the Anglican Mission in America church..
- 16:5716:57, 28 July 2006 diff hist +2,033 Talk:Peter Roskam Issue of words defintion in a political or reglious context
27 July 2006
- 23:2723:27, 27 July 2006 diff hist +122 m User talk:The Thadman →Advocacy request
- 21:4721:47, 27 July 2006 diff hist −202 Peter Roskam In the Anglican Journal where does it state Peter Roskams political position. Where is his direct quote in that publication??? Reader can real about the religious schism on the Anglican page.
- 21:3321:33, 27 July 2006 diff hist −39 m Peter Roskam replaced "Grist" for "an issue".. .an issue is more neutral
- 16:0416:04, 27 July 2006 diff hist −168 Peter Roskam Let them find it Anglican Mission in American page - adding this on this page is not relavent and only to create red herrings
- 15:5215:52, 27 July 2006 diff hist +1,208 Talk:Peter Roskam showing reason for my removal of the Anglican mission linkage to Roskam
- 15:0615:06, 27 July 2006 diff hist −8 m Talk:Peter Roskam sp
- 14:3714:37, 27 July 2006 diff hist −169 Peter Roskam What does doctrinal infighting and label calling between two religious sects have to do with Roskam. Also, this information belong on Anglican page not here. Reverting vandalism see talk
 |