Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cambial Yellowing (talk | contribs) at 19:19, 3 March 2021 (heading). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

• WP:AN/3
• WP:AN3
• WP:AN/EW
• WP:ANEW
• WP:AN/3RR

This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

• See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report.
• If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page.

You must notify any user you have reported.

You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Additional notes

• When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
• The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
• Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
• Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.

Definition of edit warring

Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)

Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.

User:HistoryofIran reported by User:Soldier of Ahura Mazda (Result: Filer blocked)

Page: Cyrus the Great (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: HistoryofIran (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Cyrus_the_Great&type=revision&diff=1009473160&oldid=1009471453 https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Cyrus_the_Great&type=revision&diff=1009466978&oldid=1009465923 https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Cyrus_the_Great&type=revision&diff=1009483553&oldid=1009483475

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments: the user "HistoryofIran" had been vandalizing the "Cyrus the Great" 's wikipedia page where i have made revisions to the "death" section of that page, by writing false narratives and insulting comments about the aforementioned article !!! i would like a reversion of all his attempts, so that my revisions can be applied to the page (which are the correct account of the history in that section). thank you !

You edit-warred after being warned and after this report was posted. Please also note that vandalism has a specific meaning on wikipedia, and the other editors' edits do not meet that definition. A 2-week partial block is a light response. Any further disruption is likely to be dealt with more severely. DrKay (talk) 21:56, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

• The reporting user above is edit warring, please see my report and the target article. Wretchskull (talk) 21:42, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

A quick look at Soldier of Ahura Mazda's edits show an editor that has 7 reverts on Cyrus the Great and has resorted to accusations of vandalism on HistoryofIran's talk page. It is clear that "Soldier of Ahura Mazda" is not here to build an encyclopedia. --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:44, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

• Result: The filer User:Soldier of Ahura Mazda has been blocked two weeks by others for violation of 3RR. See the block log. EdJohnston (talk) 20:57, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

User:Errantius reported by User:DrKay (Result: Warned)

Page: Commonwealth of Nations (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Errantius (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. part undoing
2. undoing
3. undoing
4. undoing

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:
Reply:

• 1. is removal of one word inserted by Sunil060902; not relevant to this dispute.
• 2. is not a revert; it is restoration of material in a new status believed to be more appropriate (i.e. from text to reference), as was explained ("restored Chinde mention, I think with proper status").
• 3. and 4. are reverts, although explained.
• Subsequently a "citation needed" tag has been inserted, to follow up on my earlier comments.
• Thus there have been only two reverts.
• The "attempt to resolve dispute" addresses an assumption that I have repeatedly denied making. I may try to respond, but will not be making any further revert. Errantius (talk) 11:44, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

They are all reverts. That is shown by the diffs. Removal of an insertion is a revert. Restoration of removed text is a revert. DrKay (talk) 15:45, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

• Result: User:Errantius is warned for edit warring. They may be blocked the next time they revert at Commonwealth of Nations unless they have obtained a prior consensus in their favor on the article talk page. EdJohnston (talk) 03:43, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

User:Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d reported by User:Binksternet (Result: Warned)

Page: Conservative Political Action Conference (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. Feb 27 at 22:19 UTC: Removing Nazi rune stage shape section.
2. Feb 27 at 23:00 UTC: Removing Nazi rune stage shape section.
3. Feb 27 at 23:21 UTC: Removing Nazi rune stage shape section.
4. Feb 28 at 21:47 UTC: Removing background information about Nazi rune.

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: This discussion was initiated on the user talk page.

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d started the talk page discussion.

Comments:
Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d has been applying the brakes to this article to keep it from reflecting negative press from recent events, but the sources are good, and the stories can be developed within Misplaced Pages's neutrality policy. Binksternet (talk) 23:19, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

• Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d came to my user talk page here to discuss the issue. I replied that I could see the close proximity to a 3RR violation. Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d saw my warning and replied. Binksternet (talk) 23:22, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

• In revert one & three, I simply removed content sourced to a clear unreliable source (i.e, WP:FORBESCON). And in revert two, there was no citation whatsoever (the edits reverted in revert 2 and 3 were added by a newly created SPA). As the filer mentioned, I was the one who started the talk page discussion and I have been trying to gain consensus, along with another user, for excluding the material from the article. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 23:24, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
• And the filer is correct. I went to their talk page because I didn't want to edit war. In my last revert, I didn't remove the entire section again--I removed only a few sentences tangentially related to the topic. I saw no consensus for including those few sentences so, per WP:NOCON, I removed it for the time being and I justified that removal on the talk page. I thought that would be a decent compromise between outright deletion and full retention of the content. The user who originally inserted those sentences decided to revert my revert and falsely accuse me of "vandalism" in the edit summary . Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 23:32, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
• For the record, I was not the only one who had removed the edits. At least four other users had removed the edit: , , , . And on the talk page I currently do not see a clear consensus to include the material. I do apologize for the excessive reverts on my part. And if I was asked, I would have happily self-reverted my last revert. For some reason, I thought I was exempted from 3RR when reverting unsourced or unreliably sourced edits (though that may only apply to BLPs?). Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 00:01, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
• On another note, the filer had been edit-warring on Odal (rune) trying to repeatedly insert the exact same text as on the CPAC page: , , , . Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 07:55, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

• Result: User:Dr.Swag Lord, Ph.d is warned for edit warring on Conservative Political Action Conference. You may be blocked if you revert again without receiving a prior consensus in your favor on the article talk page. The steps of WP:DR are open to you. EdJohnston (talk) 14:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

User:IAMNamibia061 reported by User:Ashleyyoursmile (Result: Partial blocked 48 hours)

Page: Monica Geingos (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: IAMNamibia061 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. Consecutive edits made from 07:39, 1 March 2021 (UTC) to 07:40, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
   1. 07:39, 1 March 2021 (UTC) ""
   2. 07:40, 1 March 2021 (UTC) "/* Personal life & career */"
2. Consecutive edits made from 07:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC) to 07:28, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
   1. 07:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC) "/* Personal life & career */"
   2. 07:28, 1 March 2021 (UTC) ""
3. 07:16, 1 March 2021 (UTC) "/* Personal life & career */"
4. 07:13, 1 March 2021 (UTC) "/* Personal life & career */"
5. Consecutive edits made from 07:05, 1 March 2021 (UTC) to 07:08, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
   1. 07:05, 1 March 2021 (UTC) ""
   2. 07:08, 1 March 2021 (UTC) "/* Personal life & career */"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 07:10, 1 March 2021 (UTC) "Welcome to Misplaced Pages!"
2. 07:14, 1 March 2021 (UTC) "Note: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material (RW 16)"
3. 07:32, 1 March 2021 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Monica Geingos."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

This user has been repeatedly adding unsourced content to the BLP, despite being reverted by Greyjoy and me. The edits appear to be somewhat leaning towards COI, so I have issued a notice on their talk page. However, they have violated 3RR. Ashleyyoursmile! 07:44, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

About a week ago there was a similar issue with the same user edit warring to add copyrighted material to this article. Greyjoy 07:46, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 48 hours 331dot (talk) 10:48, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

User:HistoryofIran reported by User:Soldier of Ahura Mazda (Result: no violation)

Page: Talk:Cyrus the Great (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: HistoryofIran (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk%3ACyrus_the_Great&type=revision&diff=1009616554&oldid=1009613493 https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk%3ACyrus_the_Great&type=revision&diff=1009612247&oldid=1009611918

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments: the User: "HistoryofIran" is changing my own comment on the "Talk:CyrustheGreat" wikipedia page, and is cherry picking my words to make a case against me and is erasing my comment, please stop his access to the page and stop him from edditing my post. he has reverted my post 2 times and other user "wretchskull" and another person kept changing it as well. please revert my comment back to the original and stop these users from putting words in my mouth, they are literally talking for themselves and me at the same time. i am being attacked and i cannot defend myself. please block their access to the page and revert my comment to the original. thank you

In other words, I haven't violated the edit warring rule. Note that this user now has lost access to edit the talk page, which he mainly filled with rants and personal attacks/aspersions, hence why I removed it. --HistoryofIran (talk) 13:42, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

i am sure "historyofiran" is much better equipped to know how the rules work and that is exactly how he is using them to hsi advantage in order to silence me, the reason that i lost the my privilege to talk in the talk section of the aforementioned wikipedia page is because of an ongoing dispute between me and him and "wretchskull" who as you see above, keeps accusing me of personal attacks while my comments are are anything but and are visible for all to see, i have asked @historyofiran to come and talk to me and discuss this until we reach a resolution, but instead he did anything but, and started accusing me of harassment and attacking him and kept dodging me instead of starting a conversation to settle this dispute, which i believe is how it works when 2 people have 2 different versions of an article in mind! and the fact that he changed my comments and cherrypicked the parts he likes in order to make me look bad should give you all the proof you need to know that he is trying to manipulate evidence. also if you check the talk section of my account, you can see that the administrator @331dot saw that @historyofiran is changing the page and and when i brought up the issue with him, it resulted in @331dot, giving @historyofiran a warning, which stopped him from changing that page and stop manipulating evidence. and now another person that is in on this "wretchskull" has changed this exact admin complaint once again and removed my comment to tamper the evidence in @historyofiran's favor, to manipulate the evidence and stop my words from reaching the administrators. please see through his malicious intent. all i ask is an impartial verdict on this. thank you. here is the diff: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard%2FEdit_warring&type=revision&diff=1009623468&oldid=1009623060 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soldier of Ahura Mazda (talk • contribs) 14:24, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

More aspersions and attacks ^^. --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:31, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

I would not characterize what I said to HistoryofIran as a warning, but a suggestion. 331dot (talk) 14:41, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

I've made the block sitewide as they aren't letting up. 331dot (talk) 14:44, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

• No violation Doug Weller talk 19:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

User:Honestandreal1 reported by User:Possibly (Result: Blocked)

Page: Jim Gardiner (Chicago politician) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Honestandreal1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 00:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC) "/* Political career */"
2. 00:09, 2 March 2021 (UTC) "/* Political career */"
3. 00:05, 2 March 2021 (UTC) "/* Political career */"
4. 23:16, 1 March 2021 (UTC) "/* Political career */"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 00:09, 2 March 2021 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring."
2. 00:17, 2 March 2021 (UTC) "/* March 2021 */ r"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

One of a number of accounts that were blocked or "likely" in this SPI. Possibly (talk) 00:22, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 48 hours Account and last IP blocked. Acroterion (talk) 01:42, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

User:JLavigne508 reported by User:Kansas Bear (Result: Warned)

Page: Biette de Cassinel (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: JLavigne508 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: and

Comments:
This is a continuation of user:JLavigne508 using sources from 1884(last I checked) to prove that Biette de Cassinel was a mistress of Charles V of France. When I found a source by the historian Lucien Merlet(1852), I was inundated with JLavigne508's calculations on how Merlet is an unreliable source. FYI, Merlet's article appears in the journal Bibliothèque de l'École des Chartes and Merlet's article is cited in numerous articles and books.

When I issued the 3rr notification, user:JLavigne508 removed it calling it Removed trolling vandalism.

FYI their response to my notifying them of this report was removed trolling vandalism.

When JLavigne508's attempt to "prove" Merlet was unreliable failed they started with personal attacks(ie reported for vandalism, You are about to be flagged a vandal, personalized comments(your behavior and editing history in here do not reflect well upon yourself.), and logging out to remove the information they will not tolerate. They removed a university source stating "Please respect and do not leave false and unfounded comments about referencing." I have told said editor to take their concerns for reliability of source(s) to the reliable sources board.

AND, JLavigne508 has canvassed two other editors:

• Aciram, trolling my edits in that and a few other pages, just trolls my edits there like a weirdo.
• maproom, another series of trolling edits to cancel mine and added some more questionable personal comments as well. --Kansas Bear (talk) 01:37, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

• Result: User:JLavigne508 is warned for edit warring at Biette de Cassinel. They may be blocked if they revert the article again without first getting a consensus in their favor on the article talk page. EdJohnston (talk) 15:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

User:Kansas Bear Reported by User:JLavigne508 (Result: Filer warned)

Concerning a certain article I had expanded and grown from a stub several years ago, the user Kansas Bear had left some relatively recent Jean de Montagu article edits and major alterations by other users unchanged as they were until 25 February 2021(see page edit history) when I simply added a link (see same history), and very bizarrely proceeded to completely change the entire article and several related articles, and has since then been very creepily and constantly been shadowing and trolling all edits I have put on this and several related pages (and apparently also very bizarrely following all of my activity on this website), all of which are in editing history timeline for this and several related pages, using combative and adversarial language from the very first edit:

Jean de Montagu -17:53, 25 February 2021‎ Kansas Bear talk contribs‎ 5,021 bytes +219‎ restored referenced information, removed by an IP(imagine that) undothank

and later,

Biette de Cassinel - curprev 01:52, 1 March 2021‎ Kansas Bear talk contribs‎ 2,212 bytes +67‎ if you can use source(s) citing a 16th century French writer(Gilles Corrozet), I can use a 19th century historian! undothank

Furthermore, they subsequently:

-Have left Biette de Cassinel article incomprehensible numerous times after I had tried to make it at least somewhat presentable for seemingly no reason other than adversarial editing, same behavior in Jean de Montagu article (almost not readable in intro., body of articles.)

-Concerning Biette de Cassinel page: Repeatedly removed cited sourced material, repeatedly placed marriage before birth date, repeatedly leaves double citations, repeatedly added incorrect information (wrong links to wrong people, etc.,,), repeatedly degraded introduction to article, repeatedly removed known family members.

Has used foul language:

Jean de Montagu (talk)=

"Explain on talk page how Jean "born ca.1363" was an advisor to Charles V who reigned 8 April 1364 – 16 September 1380!!!

Lucien Merlet is not a reliable source? LMAO."

and also,

"   Kansas Bear, I see that your most recent edit to the article has the edit summary "restored referenced information ...", when in fact you removed two references and added none. That's not vandalism, but it does look dishonest. Maproom (talk) 07:04, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

       Well excuse me all to hell. I made a mistake there. Your explanation for this edit? Considering I have show Lucien Merlet to be an academic historian?"

I was hoping to avoid bringing other people in here (as this individual has apparently very bizarrely been following) to testify to the foul language and outright unseemly behavior and questionable editing practices going back months now, as I have otherwise always had positive, constructive interactions on here and no problems with anyone else on this website, but frankly I was shocked at the numerous sordid and negative interactions on this individual's talk page with so many other users when I had to leave a notification concerning this report there, and have seen nothing else like that on this website. The edit history on the Biette de Cassinel page will show that this user came here only after I finally threatened to report them for the repeated offenses on that page (see editing history for Biette de Cassinel), although I should have reported this behavior much earlier. These articles that I have mostly created and grown, and are trying to help maintain, have been repeatedly damaged by this individual (I fully support thoughtful, helpful, and constructive contributions from all different viewpoints, but not reactionary, angry, and incomprehensible conflict edits) time and time again making what are supposed to be Encyclopedia articles in here not even presentable to the public (see prior article versions after edits by this individual), and they also need to stop following my activity immediately.

Thank you, --JLavigne508 (talk) 02:17, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

• Result: The filer, User:JLavigne508 has been warned for edit warring per another complaint. EdJohnston (talk) 15:28, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

] reported by User:Kitts BPD (Result: Malformed)

Page: West Coast of the United States (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Mechanical Keyboarder (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

• Declined – malformed report. Please use the "Click here to create a new report" link at the top of this page, which gives a template report, and provide complete diffs. Lourdes 08:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

User:御犽真夜魂 reported by User:A2569875 (Result: Blocked)

Page: Perfect magic cube (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Magic hypercube (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Equilateral dimension (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Diagonal magic cube (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Score Four (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) 3D tic-tac-toe (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Wythoff's game (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Strong Law of Small Numbers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 御犽真夜魂 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 08:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC) ""
2. 08:11, 2 March 2021 (UTC) ""
3. 06:40, 2 March 2021 (UTC) ""
4. 06:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 3RR warning on users talk page.--Salix alba (talk): 09:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Likely to be indeffed as a block-evading sockpuppet; see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Xayahrainie43. —David Eppstein (talk) 08:31, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Now blocked for a period of 24 hours. --Salix alba (talk): 09:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

User:ValantisFuturista reported by User:Apoorva Iyer (Result: Blocks)

Page: John Catsimatidis (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: ValantisFuturista (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=John_Catsimatidis&diff=1009013814&oldid=1008942960

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:John_Catsimatidis#Ethnicity_and_Birthplace/Prior_Nationality_in_Lead

Comments: We have tried multiple times to engage with this user on both the Talk page as well as his page to no avail. He continues to revert without not only adequate explanation, but also without engaging with any of the other users whatsoever. I myself made a mistake earlier (a few days ago) By reverting the editor one too many times. Once I realized my mistake, however, I stopped reverting and started reaching out to the user as well as started the talk page. But it seems that has been to no avail, as the user has reverted again, ignoring the talk page discussion as well as ignoring our pleas for discussion on his talk page. Apoorva Iyer (talk) 12:49, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

• I've tried to explain our policies and guidelines regarding ethnicity in BLPs, both on the editor's talk page and on the associated article page, with no response other than tiresome reverting. They tried it as an IP, created an account and tried to force it through that way, and have now gone back to their IP to continue to restore the disputed BLP info. If there will be sanctions on the account, the same should be applied to the /64 range in the recent article history.-- Jezebel's Ponyo 16:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Blocked -- 72 hours to the registered account, one week to the /64 range, per Ponyo's observation. Reverting the article both logged-in and logged-out, apparently. EdJohnston (talk) 22:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

User:Adam Lietuva reported by User:Sabbatino (Result:Blocked indef)

Page: Balts (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Adam Lietuva (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. The page's history speaks for itself

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

• There is a WP:SPI about the editor, but it has been ignored for some reason. Evidence there clearly shows that it is a sockpuppet. I also have tried discussing the matter with the editor, but he chose not to defend his actions (simply citing non-neutral personal opinion) and then just blanked his talk page discussion (including all the warnings and notices) without me being able to respond. WP:3RRNO allows to make as many reverts as needed when dealing with sockpuppets. – Sabbatino (talk) 16:36, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
• Blocked indefinitely, the whole contribution is edit-warring Ymblanter (talk) 21:41, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

User:Jesaispas123445 reported by User:M.Bitton (Result: sock indeffed)

Page: Krim Belkacem (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Jesaispas123445 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 17:51, 2 March 2021 (UTC) "According to french wikipedia, there is no edit warring, do you know something about Algerian War, do you know how/who trigger this War"
2. Consecutive edits made from 17:37, 2 March 2021 (UTC) to 17:37, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
   1. 17:37, 2 March 2021 (UTC) "All informations are from french wikipedia and it's better, there is a subject about it in this article."
   2. 17:37, 2 March 2021 (UTC) ""
3. 17:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC) "All informations about him are from french wikipedia"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 17:24, 2 March 2021 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Krim Belkacem."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

This editor is most likely a block evading sock of an indefed disruptive editor: see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Noname JR for more details. M.Bitton (talk) 17:52, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, all informations are from french wikipedia and there already is a subject in this article, dated 2008, about naming which shows relation with french sources and it's better because few people (among english speakers) know something about this article. Jesaispas123445 (talk) 18:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

As far as I can tell, yes they're edit warring but the info they're providing in the lead is purely what is already in the article with copious references. Not sure why they're being reverted. Canterbury Tail talk 18:32, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

@Canterbury Tail: They have been reverted by two editors (including myself) because their edit is not an improvement, and just like their previous socks, all they are interested in is the removal of the Arabic name. M.Bitton (talk) 18:37, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

 Note: They are also edit warring on Couscous: 4 reverts (1234) so far. M.Bitton (talk) 18:42, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

On the couscous article they seem to be editing to point out it is a Berber dish, which is fully supported by the references and content of the article. Incidentally looking through the history you would continually revert editors who removed Berber until only a couple of months ago. Ignoring the edit warring their edits appear to be correct for the lead based on the rest of the article and references, and you yourself are editing now against the article and references. I also think now there's some WP:OWN issues going on on that article (I know it's not the one you've reported them for and perhaps this should be taken up elsewhere.) Canterbury Tail talk 18:42, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

@Canterbury Tail: None of the sources describe it as "Berber" since its origin is unknown, but regardless, the real issue here is the continuous edit warring and the socking. If you think that's ok, the so be it, let them do whatever they want (I certainly won't stop them). M.Bitton (talk) 18:47, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

No I cannot support the edit warring, it should have gone to the talk page. Canterbury Tail talk 18:49, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Anyway my comments are irrelevant to the edit warring going on on another page. Ignore them. Canterbury Tail talk 18:56, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

• @Canterbury Tail: Also note WP:3RRNO no. 3. Although waiting until the SPI is closed and the sock blocked might be a better option to minimise disruption. Cheers RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 22:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, what are sources for Krim Belkacem biography ? For couscous, there are sources from Lucie Bolens or Charles Perry or site web "GEO", find a source to contradict it unstead of debating or remove these sources, moreover North African people are mainly Berber arabized and Massinissa was a Berber man Jesaispas123445 (talk) 00:03, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

PS: for example, Krim Belkacem is not mentionned in this source so why is in this article ????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jesaispas123445 (talk • contribs) 00:43, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Blocked indefinitely for being a WP:SOCK... (by Drmies). RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 04:43, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

User:76.167.185.31 reported by User:Gial Ackbar (Result: )

Page: My Little Pony: Equestria Girls (web series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 76.167.185.31 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

The IP makes unexplained changes that imply that the series would be continued, despite having ended last year. Refuses to comunicate. The page had been semi-prteced after edit-waring of the same IP for a week prevoiusly, see , but it startet again after the block expired. Either a longer block is required or the IP should be blocked for a longer time. Gial Ackbar (talk) 18:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

User:88.64.187.76 reported by User:Thewolfchild (Result: 72 hours)

Page: MV Astoria (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 88.64.187.76 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

6. - (this edit added after the user was advised of this report. This edit reverts an uninvolved editor who basically restored the page to my last edit. fyi)

• Note: This user also at 3RR simultaneously on Air Class Líneas Aéreas in as many hours
• (see )

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Diff of 3RRNB notification: (user has since blanked the page)

Comments:
Straightforward 4RR(+)vio plus additonal disruptive behavior, eg: in my edit summaries I request that he add sources (RS) and also link OR and BRD. His latest summary was "you know nothing from the company, Curitiba delivered a ex.Rio please read Aeroin and inform yourself as it should and stop stalking me with yours shits". This is reminiscent of another very recent edit dispute this user was involved in, (using a different IP) where he accused another editor of "stalking". Warnings on the IP user's talk page from other users indicate other possible disputes. - wolf 19:22, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 72 hours Ritchie333 21:48, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

User:Mellk reported by User:Bacondrum (Result: )

Page: Liberal Democratic Party of Russia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Mellk (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:
First two diffs provided is from 19 February, third diff is from 23 February, fourth diff is from today, 2 March. The user I reverted, Caretaker John, was confirmed by CU to be a sockpuppet and was blocked (see investigation and the user's talk page). Reverting edits by a banned user is also an exemption to edit warring, as stated by point 3 in WP:3RRNO. Bacondrum, however, stated that I made a "false claim" of sockpuppetry, when obviously this is not true. The user also previously falsely accused me of violating 3RR, saying I already "crossed the 3RR redline" when they left a warning when that was also not true and this was acknowledged at ANI here. Mellk (talk) 20:56, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

it’s never been explained who was a sock puppet, and a number of other editors have contested Mellk’s reversions, so unless they are all socks then this is no excuse. Mellk needs to stop edit warring, claiming one editor involved is a sock does not excuse edit warring, discussion rather than edit warring is the solution. (Mellk still has not made it clear who the sock is)

I undid all of the sockpuppet's edits, who made many other additions to the article that were never touched or mentioned prior. What you are referring to was added by Caretaker John in the first place and last restored by him after a different user reverted this addition. I also clarified on your talk page who was a sockpuppet by linking to Caretaker John's talk page, but your response was instead to still pretend to not know who I was talking about. And again, your diffs of my edits range over a period of almost two weeks, while you made three reverts within 24h (1, 2, 3). It seems to me that it is you who was edit warring. Mellk (talk) 08:09, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

• Administrative Comment Bacondrum, Mallk reverted a sock puppet (and more socks) bent on pushing the term fascist onto the infobox of the article. You and some editors are depending on unverified sources to push the same – some even vouching on the talk page for Encyclopaedia Britannica as the quintessential reliable source. You do know that Drmies has blocked one more sock in the meanwhile attempting the same drivel. At the same time, you don't generally seem to be a bad editor. What's going wrong here and what am I missing here? Lourdes 14:34, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
• I know Bacondrum as a decent editor, and Mellk was indeed reverting someone who was obviously a sock; I don't know if they know that. That's all I have to say on this matter. Drmies (talk) 15:16, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

User:146.198.108.170 reported by User:Cambial Yellowing (Result: )

Page: United Kingdom Internal Market Act 2020 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 146.198.108.170 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: and as IP will not have been pinged also linked to the discussion on ip's talk page.

Comments:

There has been extensive discussion and moderation over this issue which has gone dormant due to a lack of editor engagement. 146.198.108.170 did not take part in this discussion. IP has reverted to their own version over any variant of that suggested by moderator CaptainEek. Cambial foliage❧ 19:19, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

• Misplaced Pages noticeboards
• Misplaced Pages edit warring