This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rajsingam (talk | contribs) at 09:38, 19 January 2007 (m). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 09:38, 19 January 2007 by Rajsingam (talk | contribs) (m)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages.This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 1 day are automatically archived to User talk:Oden/Archive 3. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
|
1, 2, 3 |
Retirement
I'm sorry to see you go. Misplaced Pages is diminished by your absence. --Yamla 22:06, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey
Hey, don't worry about it, Sunday for me was a very bad, tense day in my life. I reacted in an uncivil manner and took my tensions out on something dumb. I actually felt stupid for lashing out later, and a bit humiliated, but now I'm past it, and all the problems in my life, and so, since everything has passed I feel better and had all that not been happening, so I should apologize to you instead because I shouldn't have let my personal problems affect my feelings towards others. Thank you for your concerns however. -- SmthManly / / 22:35, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Stop
It seems that you're considering leaving; I hope you don't, as we always need every willing contributor we can get. But this isn't why I'm here. I am, as you know, no opponent of image tagging when it is done properly. This being the case, I hope you will pay attention when I say that your approach to image tagging and to conflicts on Misplaced Pages in general needs to change. Policies are not weapons to use against those you dislike. If you have been in conflict with someone, your response should be to deal with the content of the dispute and otherwise treat them as you would any other editor. Digging through their contributions for against-policy images, or posting minor complaints to the administrators' noticeboard is not the way to go. In particular, responding to a disagreement by digging through the other party's contributions for images to tag is (aside from being the absolute least productive way to go about the job of tagging, given the anger and dispute it is sure to engender) inappropriate and harms the legitimate enforcement of the policy. (I was initially skeptical of claims that you were acting in this way, since these ten to be flung around casually in any image-tagging situation, but have now seen enough evidence to be convinced.) In the future, please do not respond in this way to conflicts. --Robth 00:34, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Anton Balasingham
Hi,
The above personality did a lot for a lasting solution in the island though he suffered from diabetes, Motor Neurone Disease, a degenerative disease of the nervous system, and possibly medicine-induced bile duct cancer.
Now putting his Bio "Terrorist Tag", I feel unreasonable and removing it, please take necessary action on this.
I have discussed my points at Talk:Anton Balasingham.Rajsingam 09:38, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Jimbo Wales Oden RaveenS Bakasuprman SiobhanHansa Wackymacs Seraphimblade Freedom skies Rumpelstiltskin223 Dangerous-Boy Ccscott Dennisthe2 DoDoBirds Mariano Anto Bruno Mascarenhas Tarinth