This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 16:36, 18 July 2021 (Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 16:36, 18 July 2021 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Well put!
"I believe that controversial topics should be treated from every point of view, instead of looking for an unattainable consensus."
I agree completely, and I will have the remember this quote for the future since it IS so well put. However, I can't agree with you comment on changing cat. "Pseudoscience" to something else. :) -- Sjschen 14:21, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
Reich
Hi, I left a note on the talk page explaining why I reverted the intro, although I had lots of other reasons e.g. unexplained deletion of details. An edit that extensive made by an anon without explanation and no sourcing will almost always be reverted. SlimVirgin 22:17, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
Re: Falsifiability and Validity
Sorry for the long delay in responding to your comment on my Talk page. I just responded - also on my Talk page, for continuity. FrankZappo 22:26, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks for the input! However, from my sources, it seems like Americans with last names like "LaBarge", "Berge", "Barge", etc. come from the last name "de la Berge" which would mean "of the riverbank" (right? you tell me!) You can see my new and improved chart at User:The-dissonance-reports/Names The-dissonance-reports 03:37, 18 April 2006 (UTC)