This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 16:20, 27 December 2024 (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Economics/Archive 10) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:20, 27 December 2024 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Economics/Archive 10) (bot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Economics and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | WikiProject Economics was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 19 December 2011. |
Hélène Rey
I've added some initial discussion of the contributions of Prof. Hélène Rey here: . There's a lot more that can be added, if anyone's familiar with her work and contributions.
To what extent does gross private domestic investment determine the rate of growth?
The article on gross private domestic investment says it "is an important component of GDP because it provides an indicator of the future productive capacity of the economy." To what extent does GPDI actually determine the rate of growth?
Please answer at Talk:Economic growth#To what extent does gross private domestic investment determine the rate of growth? thanks. EllenCT (talk)
Davos question listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Davos question. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.
Draft:Richard Duncan (economist)
Hey folks! I just created this article and it was moved to the draft-space before I added the references :-/ Could anyone review it and help out with moving it to the article-space? Thanks Fede.Campana (talk)
That's the link for easy access: Draft:Richard Duncan (economist) Fede.Campana (talk)
Proposed deletion of Energy quality
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Energy_quality_(2nd_nomination)
Stephen Salant notable?
came across Stephen Salant article, appears written by a StephenSalant in 2010, appears he is most likely not notable by the guidelines going by the "Average Professor Test", but I have no background in economics, maybe someone can take a look if anything he is connected to makes the article worth keeping BenErroneous (talk) 05:54, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- He's professor emeritus at UMich (above average) with an h-index (33) that's fine but not remarkable for an economist.
- IMO you could reasonably argue to either keep or delete his page. But probably it shouldn't be kept in its current form (correctly flagged autobiographical)—should be rewritten so it doesn't look quite so much like his CV. Themrbeaumont (talk) 10:48, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
 Hello, |
Draft:Economic imperialism
Hi, I've created a draft at Draft:Economic imperialism as this seems to be a big omission in wikipedia's coverage, and was wondering whether anyone would be interested in collaborating to write and structure it, including defining scope and gathering sources. Economic imperialism currently links to Theory of imperialism. Alexanderkowal (talk) 11:25, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:BRICS#Requested move 23 June 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:BRICS#Requested move 23 June 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. RodRabelo7 (talk) 00:35, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
"Rallying"
FYI, the name and primary topic of Rallying is under discussion at a move request. See talk:Rallying -- 64.229.90.32 (talk) 05:22, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Economics of biodiversity
Hi all, I have been making some changes to the page Economics of biodiversity since it had not been updated for a while and was lacking in references. I was wondering if someone with an economics background would be interested in helping to improve the article to reflect the debate on economic valuation of biodiversity. Manxshearwater (talk) 15:53, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for John Maynard Keynes
John Maynard Keynes has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:18, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
Create a category for professional societies of economists?
There are about 10 societies of economists in Category:Business and finance professional associations. That's not quite where they belong, e.g. for societies that are made up mainly of academics not addressing business or finance. We could create a new category for "Economics-related professional associations". It would go into Category:Professional associations by profession, parallel to the business/finance one, and to a natural set of peers in the fields of psychology, architecture, and geography. I would like a more concise name like "Economist societies" or "Societies of economists" but it seemed to make sense to follow the naming system established by parallel groups. Any thoughts? The next step, I think, is to check with category specialists at Misplaced Pages talk:Categories for discussion, and if there are no objections there, to just create it. -- econterms (talk) 17:22, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Flag of convenience
Flag of convenience has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:55, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Wikidata and social sciences
Hi, I am trying to contribute on Wikidata around social sciences themes. I started to list relevant properties here : Wikidata:WikiProject Wikidata for research/Data models/Social science results Feel free to suggest others, for example properties that may help generate infoboxes.
Jeanne Noiraud (talk) 20:43, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Economic policy of the Joe Biden administration#Requested move 10 November 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Economic policy of the Joe Biden administration#Requested move 10 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 00:04, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
The Center on Race, Poverty and the Environment
Perhaps someone from this WikiProject could take a look at The Center on Race, Poverty and the Environment and assess it (particularly with respect to WP:NORG and WP:NOBLE). The article was created directly in the main space by a student participating in a WP:WEP affiliated university course; so, it never really underwent any type of formal assessment (e.g. WP:AFC) and it doesn't seem to have yet been reviewed by WP:NPP. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:04, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Premiumization
I just created a stub for Premiumization. A strategy observed in pretty much all consumer products over the past 15 years or so. Thriley (talk) 18:44, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for American automobile industry in the 1950s
American automobile industry in the 1950s has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:26, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Eurasian Economic Union
Eurasian Economic Union has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:25, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: