This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) at 14:00, 10 January 2025 (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Ron Paul/Archive 11) (bot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:00, 10 January 2025 by Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Ron Paul/Archive 11) (bot)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Skip to table of contents |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ron Paul article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Ron Paul. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Ron Paul at the Reference desk. |
Ron Paul was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily Paul was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 04 October 2011 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Ron Paul. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
American Sovereignty Restoration Act was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 03 July 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Ron Paul. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Use of the words fiscal policy to describe opinions on the federal reserve instead of monetary policy
Hi all,
First timer here. Maybe nitpicking but in macro-economic courses that I took (Econ and math major) I was taught that the federal reserve's interest rate manipulation, open-market operations etc. were examples of monetary policy, not fiscal policy. I understand fiscal policy to be more the tool of congress i.e. changing taxes or spending money to stimulate the economy. I believe articles on fiscal vs monetary policy should support this.
This is in one of the first paragraphs in the introduction section, which I guess I can't edit. Language would be much more precise if it were to be changed imho. 2601:586:5280:EEB0:303D:85BB:6EF8:B46E (talk) 05:32, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
- You are correct. I edited this sentence accordingly. –CWenger (^ • @) 14:34, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
- No, I didn't put my comments about unsourced materials here! They appeared separately in original. Leslynjd (talk) 01:44, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
== Unsourced claims about number of delegates at the 2008 Republican National Conventions and the results of the subsequent elections. Without sources, "popularity" is an opinion, not a fact. == I apologize for putting this in the text rather than as a footnote. I haven't edited since Edward Snowden. That article received so much partisan argument as well as deletion of sourced facts that I gave up. I've forgotten how to exactly insert footnotes in text about "Needs source."
Unsourced claims about number of delegates at the 2008 Republican National Conventions and the results of the subsequent elections. Without sources, national "popularity" is an opinion, not a fact. Leslynjd (talk) 01:33, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Unsourced claims about delegates at the RNC 2008, 2012, and results of national elections.
Unsourced claims about number of delegates at the 2008 Republican National Conventions and the results of the subsequent elections. Without sources, "popularity" is an opinion, not a fact. == I apologize for noting this in the text of the article, rather than as a footnote.this in the text rather than as a footnote. I haven't edited since Edward Snowden. That article received so much partisan argument as well as deletion of sourced facts that I gave up. I've forgotten how to exactly insert footnotes in text about "Needs source." Leslynjd (talk) 01:48, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Categories:- Delisted good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- High-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Pennsylvania articles
- Mid-importance Pennsylvania articles
- C-Class U.S. Congress articles
- High-importance U.S. Congress articles
- WikiProject U.S. Congress persons
- C-Class United States articles
- High-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of High-importance
- C-Class United States presidential elections articles
- Mid-importance United States presidential elections articles
- WikiProject United States presidential elections articles
- C-Class Texas articles
- High-importance Texas articles
- WikiProject Texas articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class Anti-war articles
- Mid-importance Anti-war articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- C-Class American politics articles
- Low-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- C-Class Libertarianism articles
- High-importance Libertarianism articles
- WikiProject Libertarianism articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class Skepticism articles
- Low-importance Skepticism articles
- WikiProject Skepticism articles
- C-Class Alternative views articles
- Low-importance Alternative views articles
- WikiProject Alternative views articles
- C-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Low-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- C-Class Economics articles
- Low-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- C-Class International relations articles
- Low-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles
- C-Class Pittsburgh articles
- Low-importance Pittsburgh articles
- WikiProject Pittsburgh articles
- C-Class Conservatism articles
- Mid-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles
- Misplaced Pages pages referenced by the press