This is an old revision of this page, as edited by NotAGenious (talk | contribs) at 18:08, 15 January 2025 (new). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:08, 15 January 2025 by NotAGenious (talk | contribs) (new)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) 2025 United States Supreme Court case| Royal Canin U. S. A. v. Wullschleger | |
|---|---|
 Supreme Court of the United States | |
| Argued October 7, 2024 Decided January 15, 2025 | |
| Full case name | ROYAL CANIN U. S. A., INC., et al. v. WULLSCHLEGER et al. |
| Docket no. | 23-677 |
| Citations | 604 U.S. January 15 (more) |
| Argument | Oral argument |
| Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
| Questions presented | |
| Concerning the ability of a plaintiff, in an action properly removed to federal court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a) on the basis of federal-question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, to compel a remand to state court by amending the complaint to omit federal questions:
1. Whether such a post-removal amendment of the complaint defeats federal-question subjectmatter jurisdiction. 2. Whether such a post-removal amendment of the complaint precludes a district court from exercising supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s remaining state-law claims pursuantto 28 U.S.C. § 1367. | |
| Holding | |
| Eight circuit affirmed. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Kagan, joined by unanimous |
Royal Canin U. S. A. v. Wullschleger, 604 U.S. ___ (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court affirmed the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, ordering that a "deletion of all federal claims deprived the District Court of federal-question jurisdiction" and as such, the suit became one for a state court. Justice Elena Kagan delivered the opinion of the unanimous court.
See also
References
- "Royal Canin U. S. A. v. Wullschleger, 604 U.S. ___ (2025)". Justia Law. Retrieved 2025-01-15.
- "Royal Canin U.S.A., Inc. v. Wullschleger". SCOTUSblog. Retrieved 2025-01-15.
- "BREAKING: High Court Says Dropping Federal Claims Ends Federal Jurisdiction - Law360". www.law360.com. Retrieved 2025-01-15.
External links
- Text of Royal Canin U. S. A., Inc. v. Wullschleger is available from: Cornell Justia Oyez (oral argument audio) Supreme Court (slip opinion)
- SCOTUS oral argument audio
- SCOTUS oral argument transcript
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |