This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ralbot (talk | contribs) at 08:12, 15 May 2007 (Signpost delivery using AWB). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 08:12, 15 May 2007 by Ralbot (talk | contribs) (Signpost delivery using AWB)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
|
|
| 1-2-3- 4-5-6-7-8-9 -10-11-12-13 -14-15 |
I give myself the authority to remove bogus warning templates from my page Bakaman Bakatalk 04:19, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
My edits removed from BJP page
Honourable Sir, You have removed the of my contribution to the BJP page which I had added whilst putting a commentary on the talk page.Could your esteemed self please let me the reason of this sudden editing away of my edits without assigning any reason.
Kind Regards, Sir, I am new to this stuff maybe you can let me know if this is a standard practice on Misplaced Pages to edit away others contributions without stating why.I will remain indebted to you.
Terminador 01:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
HARASSMENT
You wrote this to me: Misplaced Pages is not an advertising service. Promotional articles about yourself, your friends, your company or products, or articles created as part of a marketing or promotional campaign, will be deleted in accordance with our deletion policies. For more information, see Misplaced Pages:Spam.
I put up information for donations on a site about a woman's rights and violence relief site. Godalmighty. That is not a friend or a product.
As a man from that region, perhaps you are threatened by women's rights groups. Get over it. If you continue to harass this woman's site, I'll complain.JP
Again, STOP HARASSING ME, and stop harassing the site on woman's rights. It is the new millennium. DO deal with it, honey.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by JP (talk • contribs).
Castes
Well mate, I'm not sure I agree. If that category were to be added to the Caste page, I would object. Globally, caste is probably not derived from Hinduism. However, I would argue that castes in the Indian subcontinent were developed in a society that was overwhelmingly Hindu. But if you want to make another article, you should talk to admin Utcursch. Maybe he can offer some good advice. Cheers. Agoras 03:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Category:Jat people
I don't think anybody will support the deletion -- it will be argued that this is just like other categories ( Category:Assamese people, Category:Bengali people etc.), since Jat people are also an ethnic group. utcursch | talk 04:17, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Ngo Dinh Diem
Hello, Bakasuprman.
We need to discuss your edits. Dr. Mark Moyar (cited in the article) has recently published a history of Vietnam War that makes a convincing case that Diem did not persecute the Buddhists. For example, Dr. Moyar documents that Diem had more Buddhists in his cabinet (8) than any other denomination, that the Buddhist protests only began in May 1963 because of Diem's decision to enforce a long-standing ordinance against all religious denominations, and these protests were perpetuated in part by Communist infiltrators and exaggerated by the media. You may not buy all of this, but I think we need to present both points of view.--VnTruth 19:18, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Madame Nhu's big mouth caused a lot of mischief. I'll be in touch.--VnTruth 20:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Good evening, B.
I've revised the Buddhist paragraph to make it clear that the assertions contained therein represent one, albeit majority, POV. Let me know if you have any problems with the edits. I'll probably insert a couple of paragraphs stating the revisionist POV (and describing it as such) in the near future. --VnTruth 21:43, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Indrajit Gupta
I have expanded Indrajit Gupta and submitted it for DYK. Regards. -- P.K.Niyogi 06:05, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Crveni Krst (Belgrade)
|
Did you know? was updated. On 29 March, 2007, a fact from the article Crveni Krst (Belgrade), which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
--howcheng {chat} 06:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Traver
Hey, Thank man. Traver Rebello 18:02, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
i'm not leaving
but i'm exactly happy with what's going on.--D-Boy 20:34, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject India Newsletter: Volume II, Issue 2 - March 2007
|
|
|
G. S. Shivarudrappa
|
|
Did you know? was updated. On 30 March, 2007, a fact from the article G. S. Shivarudrappa, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
--howcheng {chat} 17:35, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Wiki Raja
I have indef-blocked Wiki Raja as a block evading sockpuppet of User:Indrancroos. I came to this decision taking a look at the evidence listed at the RfCU page and discussing the issue with User:Dmcdevit. - Aksi_great (talk) 17:48, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Hindutva propganda
Smells of WP:UNDUE ... its aboot the time it is AfD'd... Amey Aryan DaBrood 18:45, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
it would help if you can come on Gtalk... Amey Aryan DaBrood 18:48, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Sarathambal
|
|
Did you know? was updated. On 30 March, 2007, a fact from the article Sarathambal, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
--howcheng {chat} 23:55, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Axxn 07:04, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Well, about Indonesia.... the figures given by PHDI ia anyway inflated..... I visited their site.... Not a word in English.... So difficult to get any information..... Like Vietnam.... I have no idea how many hindus are there.............
Re:Dab
Hi - I've told user:WIN and now you to not make things personal and emotional. Even though his tone was threatening, Dab was not doing anything wrong when he warned you about the opening of an arbitration case. Dab has his behavior problems, but that is no excuse - if you honestly feel he is causing problems, then pursue proper dispute resolution yourself. The issue of Hindutva propaganda will be decided by the AfD debate consensus. Rama's arrow 16:35, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Shahbag
I have just put the article to peer review. Would you care to take a look? Aditya Kabir 20:08, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Two things
Firstly, Ragib has requested assistance in one of your favourite areas of writing here at the Hindu Noticeboard.
And secondly...
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
| A Barnstar for the terrific effort you put into creating DYKs! Gizza 11:57, 2 April 2007 (UTC) |
(Your "Awards" page was looking a little shallow :p)
Watch it
Your normal tendency to stretch the truth or make broad, sweeping statements based on no information whatever was on display again here. . I don't edit when logged out. That implies an inability to justify my edits, which I never display, unlike others. Hornplease 19:59, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your support
. ←Humus sapiens 23:39, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Summary of Devadasi arguments
Just as a disclaimer, I have to say that I know close to nothing about the caste structure in India, or really that much about Devadasis. I became involved because there was a whitewashed version being forced in by a Hkelkar sockpuppet awhile back. Furthermore, the two users have very difficult to understand arguments, but here goes:
- Mudaliar showed up one day and added a poorly structured rant about Kaikolars (apparently a caste) yielding devadasis. He originally sourced this with 'google searches' and used a lot of bold text. Now he is more organized but I still don't see his arguments as making sense. He cites a few sources that discuss some Kaikolars in South India giving girls to be devadasis by tradition. He also attaches this to the Chola empire, saying that they helped the Chola empire gain prominence. While it seems his sources are good, I cannot check them (obscured by registration) and have the feeling that he is gravely misinterpreting them. To get to the point, Mudaliar is taking sources discussing some devadasi traditions in parts of South India and purporting this to mean that Kaikolars are the 'source' of devadasis for all India. He further asserts that Kaikolars are the same as some other caste (Segunthar or Isai-Vellar, something like that). For one, I'm rather certain that devadasis don't all originate only with the Kaikolar, and his sources didn't seem to be supporting that, so I moved the information into a more specific section. I mean, if they exist all over India, it is implausible that they are 'made' in Kaikolar-land and then shipped all over the subcontinent!
- Venki123 seems to take particular offense to one of the caste 'equations' that Mudaliar makes, saying that he is misportraying one of those castes as the same as Kaikolar. He further asserts that Mudaliar is doing this to take the devadasi-shame off of one of the castes that Mudaliars are apparently part of. Specifically, he claims that Mudaliar is trying to "slander" the Segunthar caste. Sorry it is very vague; try taking a look at their rants and maybe you will understand better than I.
Anyway, all I have done so far is move those Kaikolar 'facts' to a specific section. I also called for an expansion to cover more Indian states because Mudaliar said his Kaikolar thing should be universal to the article if no other states are covered. I felt expansion was needed to prevent Mudaliar from carrying his 'universal' misinterpretation back to the more general level. Fortunately, Venki123 obliged and added info about other regions/groups. It isn't sourced correctly but at least it is there.
Please, try to figure out the deal there. The two are battling over this caste defamation issue across a number of pages and don't appear to stop anytime soon. I'll give Venki123 some credit for actually trying mediation, though he listed an absurd number of parties and so I don't think it will go through. As you know I asked someone on the ANI to review their edits and block them for awhile. It seems to be forgotten by the admins, but hopefully someone will get around to it. Then, you can move in and sort things out. Hopefully then won't sock the page during this time. But come on, of course they will. Anyway, I am sorry about the lack of clarity here but I'm really in over my head at this point. Thanks for taking up the challenge! The Behnam 01:48, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
DYK
|
On 3 April, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Indrajit Gupta, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
--ALoan (Talk) 17:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
enlightenment
wikipedians define a troll, and everyone gets the enlightenment 
. --Bhadani (talk) 19:17, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- I thought that you should also get some light. --Bhadani (talk) 19:19, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- Another zealot has come to light, it seems, sigh - I am sure you do not sigh much like many others as excessive sighing is dangerous symptoms: ]. --Bhadani (talk) 19:32, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 2nd, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 14 | 2 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Majorly's RfB
Hey Bakasuprman, thanks for your kind support in my RfB. Sadly, it didn't pass, but I appreciate the support, and I do intend to run again eventually. Happy editing! Majorly (o rly?) 03:31, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
User:Kathanar
I think it would be better to go for formal dispute resolution. utcursch | talk 04:50, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Hindutva propaganda
What is your opinion on this, it's a phenomenon ripping Misplaced Pages apart from the seams, with fanatical supporters of Swami Vivekananda and his RSS revising history to make people believe lies. Think of all the children that enter Misplaced Pages and see this revisionist history and will need deprogramming in the future. I commend our maintsream admins. I support the neutrality and common non-OR sense of our admins. By the way, did you know that Swami Vivekananda himself used to write propaganda and publish it in Voice of India. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.178.139.138 (talk) 23:54, 3 April 2007 (UTC).
- It's called sarcasm baka........your response to these comments suggest you are the anti-Hindu troll. Add that to your list of names if you want....—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.178.139.138 (talk) 23:54, 3 April 2007 (UTC).
Reversion
Dear Bakasuprman, you reverted a non-vandalism edit by another user who had provided an edit summary here. It is considered very bad form to use a tool to revert the good faith edit of another user, especially when that user provides an edit summary justifying/explaining their edit. If you are going to revert another editor, please do it manually and use an edit summary explaining why you are reverting. Reverting with an edit tool is solely for undoing obvious vandalism.—Perceval 05:47, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- It was not vandalism. You clearly disagree with the other editor, but using a revert tool to undo their good faith edit (even if it was wrong-headed) is poor form. Next time, revert manually and leave an explanation in the edit summary.—Perceval 22:37, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
People from Kashmir
There already exists a Category:People from Jammu and Kashmir and yet another category of Kashmiri people and now you have created another category by name of People of Kashmir.It is unnecessary I feel.;Shyamsunder 12:37, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Stop
Stop violating Wiki policy on Words to avoid.] I already mentioned this to you before, so i dont understand why you keep on doing this. I will revert your edits, and if you continue to do this i will file a complaint against you. IP198 14:22, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
But seriously...
Isn't it a bit broad to include under 'anti-____(religion)' links under the 'see also' section? I removed antisemitism originally since it doesn't really have anything to do with the anti-Hindu prejudices. I have now added the other links since it seems we are simply linking to other religious prejudices, but I'm hoping you will consider changing that approach and removing all three of them. I think we should stick to stuff that actually has to do with the anti-Hindu prejudice. Tell me what you think. Also, you still feel up to devadasi? The Behnam 23:50, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Also, why was this edit characterized as minor with no edit summary? Seems like a 'major' amount of content. The Behnam 23:51, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Please also consider that those three are already linked in the "Discrimination" template on the right. Realizing that I'm going to remove them all, since there is no point repeating them. The Behnam 23:53, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Yup I've taken care of the redundancy. Thanks for looking into that devadasi thing, as it is way over my head. And those two users' stupid war is probably going to ArbCom now. It is ridiculous. Anyway, what exactly is going on at the anti-Hinduism page? Just for starters it may help to cut down on non-RS sources, especially for multiply ref'd statements, such as this source . The Behnam 00:06, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, that is a good start. Generally, I don't think that people will find as many reasons to undo tons of stuff if the stuff itself is sourced well. Hence we keep 'Hindu American Foundation' kind of stuff, and get rid of... whatever that thing was. The 'denigrations' page. The Behnam 00:13, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
LOL
Apparently you are also a Muslim man who "jumped all over" the Mukhtar Mai page. At least I see no other user to be the third man , so I think it is implied. Better add that to your list of accusations! The Behnam 00:23, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- See . --Ragib 00:48, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
FYI regarding two AfDs
Namaste. FYI, I nominated Pooja_Kumar_-_Bharatanatyam_dancer for speedy deletion on the basis of spam and non-notability, and only now have noticed that you had made an edit on Pooja Kumar (model) which is also up for deletion. I just wanted to be sure that you were aware that both pages were AfD at the moment in case you wanted to be involved. Best wishes, Buddhipriya 03:03, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with your assessment on the notability. Apparently what happened is that after I tagged the dancer page for speedy deletion, User:Mahayogini, who has been making a lot of unsourced changes to content on various pages, tagged the model page for deletion. You may want to take a look at her edit path. I have placed enough warnings on her talk page already and hesitate to place more. Buddhipriya 03:23, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Alamgir Kabir (filmmaker)
|
|
Did you know? was updated. On 9 April, 2007, a fact from the article Alamgir Kabir (filmmaker), which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
--howcheng {chat} 16:06, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Regarding Devadasi
I just added information about how some Kaikolars were dedicated as Devadasis in South India. I have given more than 10 valid academic references. Venki123 (talk · contribs) is not allowing me to add this information and constantly edit-wars with me on this issue. He further manipulates the "Kaikolar" name at his own discretion. The articles are all research articles and books that quote numerous references to Kaikolar Devadasis and clearly say that the caste name is Kaikolar and they identify with the "Terinja-Kaikolar-Padai" (literally "known kaikolar soldiers" or personal bodyguards in Tamil) in the Chola empire. You can check out the evidence at the or Devadasi:Talk Mudaliar 02:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Its just objective. I made an edit to Devadasi backed by valid references. I have just been labelled and swore at with a variety of names after this. I thought the spirit of wikipedia was to make constructive edits. I don't believe my edit "kaikolar Devadasis in South India and Chola Empire" (small compared to other info in Devadasi) is defamatory. You mean to say that my edit is more defamatory than this:?Mudaliar 02:39, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks wrt Setalvad
Guy seems to want to keep on putting his POV. His edit history shows 'interesting' changes made to several topics. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mikeslackenerny (talk • contribs) 03:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC).
Signpost updated for April 9th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 15 | 9 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
Special note to spamlist users: Apologies for the formatting issues in previous issues. This only recently became a problem due to a change in HTML Tidy; however, I am to blame on this issue. Sorry, and all messages from this one forward should be fine (I hope!) -Ral315
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:47, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Satyanand stokes and vidya stokes
Hello Bakasuprman you are right, Their relationship- they both are human beings. Just kidding. I never said that they have any relationship. Did I? Thanks Sushant gupta 11:41, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Vidya Stokes is the daughter in law (married to his youngest son Lal Chand Stokes) of Satyananda. — Lost 14:31, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot Lost for enhancing my knowledge regarding these two, Hey Bakasuprman, my work was based on only Vidya Stokes. I never edited anything about Satyanand Stokes. But yes I added a link to Satyanand Stokes in the Template:History HP. Are you interested in editing regarding Himachal Pradesh topics. Tell me as soon as possible. Good Day. Sushant gupta 11:41, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
warning
In regards to this comment, Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. Rama's arrow (just a sexy boy) 14:52, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages is meant for human beings, not monkeys. "Eye for an eye" is NOT an excuse - the warning stands. Rama's arrow (just a sexy boy) 17:18, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Book about Devamrita Swami
Hey. You'll find you're actually referring to Bhakti Tirtha Swami, and book "Black Lotus". Thanks for the heads up though. Chopper Dave 22:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Re:Iskcon incident
Incase you missed it, Dave has provided these links (below) on Suhotra Prabhu. The news story called him Suhotra Maharaj out of respect. Ys, Gouranga(UK) 15:16, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- That'll be Suhotra Prabhu probably Chopper Dave 21:50, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Merging American-Born Confused Desi
Hello Bakaman,
I've nominated American-Born Confused Desi to be merged with South Asian American. I've given my reasons here. I saw your comments on the page, and I thought you might be interested in joining the discussion. --vi5in 17:44, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
So said the Master
- experienced wikipedian circumventing the civility
- "Invertebrate organisms thus are comprised of a collection of sub-brains, each of which controls a separate part of the animal with fairly complete autonomy and no real centralized control. Sensors and their ganglia tend to cluster nearer the head, making not a true brain as we understand the term but rather a large bundle of distinct fibers." . --Bhadani (talk) 17:35, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- BTW you may be aware of Central Institute of Psychiatry located in my home town Ranchi. They care for the patients very well. In case, you want to refer someone, please feel free to message me through wikipedia mail. Regards. --Bhadani (talk) 17:42, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- "Invertebrate organisms thus are comprised of a collection of sub-brains, each of which controls a separate part of the animal with fairly complete autonomy and no real centralized control. Sensors and their ganglia tend to cluster nearer the head, making not a true brain as we understand the term but rather a large bundle of distinct fibers." . --Bhadani (talk) 17:35, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Category:Hindu physicians
I have nominated Category:Hindu physicians for deletion. In general, the intersection between religion and profession does not seem meaningful in this particular case. If you wish to comment, you may do so at WP:CFD. Dr. Submillimeter 15:45, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Re:IslamismSA
Yes, it would be ok. Rama's arrow (just a sexy boy) 01:09, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Attempt to delete category of Jewish athletes
Well, they are trying to delete a category of Jewish athletes again. This time, figure skaters. See http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_April_14#Category:Jewish_figure_skaters . I pointed out to the originator of the attempt that we had addressed this general issue already with Jewish fencers, where the attempt failed (due in part to your help). Still, they insist on trying to delete this category. Any help by your weighing in on the issue would be appreciated. Thanks again. --Epeefleche 00:24, 16 April 2007 (UTC)--Epeefleche 20:12, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Merge for American Born Confused Desi
Hello Bakaman,
I have added a paragraph to the "Identity" section in South Asian American, which explains the term "ABCD". I was wondering if you could take a look at it. Thanks --vi5in 16:30, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Indian collaboration of the week news
As mentioned in Wikiproject India newsletter of March 2007, the weekly collaboration of the Indian wikiproject has fallen from its once high feats. This message is to request the users to visit the collaboration page and help rejuvenate it.
The present collaboration of the week is Religion in India. Please go through the talk page of the article to see the proposed changes in the article. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 05:21, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 16th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 16 | 16 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:39, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Peer review
The follwing article is being tagged to be peer reviewed. Your input will be much appreciatedRaveenS Thanks, Baka
Raj2004 10:05, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
The endless war at Anti-Hinduism
I am concerned about the edit war going on there. The wording that you restored adds unspecified broadness that is probably a POV projected from a source; to establish "certain" people is much better than "many" in this situation. Perhaps of more concern is that you and others have restored sections that use 'dead' references, such as . I cannot tell whether those sources are receiving due weight or are being neutrally described because they no longer exist. You look silly restoring dead links so re-edit to remove these sources and any ideas drawn from them. Thanks. The Behnam 22:51, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
- Do I need to remove the dead information myself?
- Never mind, they started working again. The Behnam 04:52, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Rashtrakuta
Thanks for your support.Dineshkannambadi 23:26, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
H. Sudarshan
Hi, I saw your edit on this article where you have categorised it to Hindu revivalists. I dont see any link of Sudarshan with Hindu revivalism. I hope you are not confusing H. Sudarshan with K. S. Sudarshan. Please clarify -- Amarrg 15:48, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Misplaced Pages better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 16:01, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Goa Inquisition
Please see the talk page as to why I have removed the section Massacre of Muslims. --Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 04:33, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Disputed Article
In the article Great power you recently edited and added a sentence which is disputed and baseless in terms of research and sparks up a debate "defeated Pakistan in all 3 wars" on who won or who lost discuss your arguements here. This is against the five pillars of Misplaced Pages and NPOV policy. Please read the Misplaced Pages:Five pillars and Misplaced Pages:NPOV before editing any further. Faraz 01:12, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- Is that a threat? if you add that part in the article again, I will contact the head of military related articles in terms of dispute and I'm pretty sure he will take actions against your edits as they are clear violations of Misplaced Pages policy. Faraz 01:30, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- No, it is not an accepted fact. Get your facts right according to the Misplaced Pages articles on 1947, 1965 and 1999 wars were stalemate none were won by any opponent. Faraz 01:36, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- I have contacted a member of the Arbitration Committee. lets wait and see what happens. Faraz 02:18, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I am not that knowledgeable in India's past wars with Pakistan and it's quest for great power status, I just have a basic overview and have heard in the past about the Pakistani media's tendency to exaggerate. I do not want to get involved in an edit war with Faraz here, who believes his point of view very strongly. Traing 08:47, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
blocked
You have been blocked for meatpuppetry and sockpuppetry - please see this ANI report. Rama's arrow (just a sexy boy) 02:16, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Responses
 Y
|
Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):
Request handled by: Nishkid64 (talk) 23:58, 23 April 2007 (UTC) |
- Here are my responses to Rama's Arrow's crusade to defame me. I will not be editing here for a long time while I sort out who double-crossed me and attacked me, and who are the real wikipedians.
- I never attacked bhadani, nor have I maligned him in any way, considering him as a wikipedian I respect
- I have not "Taken orders" from Hkelkar, I am most capable of understanding my own worldview. There are many users with similar POV's as well
- Hkelkar, contrary to popular belief, has not kept me in the loop about his sockpuppetry and has not listened the many times we have told him to stop. I do not ask him to revert, edit, or exist on wikipedia, he does so on his own and against the wishes of many of us who actually hope new users on Hinduism topics are just that, new users.
- I do not post to forums ranting and recruiting acolytes on Hindutva whine boards. Hindu Unity is full of retards who have seizures when they see an Indian woman being kissed by a foreigner. It does not bother me in the least bit who does what. In fact, posting there would be counterproductive since it is people like HU that make Hindutva look like a group of fanatics
- I have not violated 3RR ever nor do I need to. Misplaced Pages will be here tomorrow, a fact Hkelkar never understood. The fiasco at Great Power is a prime example of this.
- Rumplestiltskin was not known by me to be hkelkar's sockpuppet, and I was rather disappointed hkelkar would resort to these tricks. After that, I am certain I have not advocated for "Hkelkar" under any guise.
- Aksi's appeal to WP:Wikilawyering is a joke. Sarvagnya drives the point home. Nobody can deny that I have my own POV. Hkelkar does not order me around. It is quite obvious I have eccentric tastes in editing and am not accountable to anyone. I have made edits in line with Hkelkar's POV even when he was on wiki. Am I supposed to have an epiphany and stop?
- The evidence Rama has is an assertion. I have called his bluff. My part in the emails was encouraging the other users to get their head out of the toilet and work on India related pages, Hinduism related pages, and to build bridges with other users. Not scheming and proxying.
- Potential Personal attack and incivility problems are dealt with an RFC, WP:MEDCABAL. Then comes Arbcom, after an RFC or medcabal. Not with an unjustified 6 month vigilante block based on an ambiguous construct, false assumptions, faulty casual relation, faulty analogical reasoning and evidence that does not corroborate to his invalid assertions. That and the fact that he wished to attack me in an opprobrious manner.
- I will not be active in the near future.Bakaman 22:54, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Rahul Gandhi
No, there are no new incidents that I am aware of. Only some statements from Congress on the same issue. But there is no point elaborating too much on this one issue in the article. --Knverma 20:11, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Unblocked conditionally
I have conditionally unblocked you. Please see . Thanks. ←Humus sapiens 23:23, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 23rd, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 17 | 23 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:25, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
RfAR
A request for arbitration has been filed involving you. You may be unblocked to enable participation in the process. Rama's arrow (just a sexy boy) 21:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ok. Scheme is obviously used in relation to the allegations of "scheming" with hkelkar. The scheme was the system, i.e. the email list I was a part of.Bakaman 23:18, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Alain Daniélou
We had a little edit conflict on the Alain Daniélou page where you kept removing the ”LGBT people from France” category, which I kept re-inserting. Now you’ve removed the reference to his boyfriend on the page (resulting in a grammatically incorrect sentence!) and removed the category again. Come on. I take it you don’t approve of Daniélou’s sexuality, and he converted to your religion, but again, come on! With all the hundreds of millions of Hindus, there must be thousands doing stuff that you don’t approve of ... please stop trying to cover up inconvenient facts about this particular convert. Bossk-Office 18:25, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Provide a reliable source for his preferences and we'll call it good. Bakaman 00:10, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
He wrote about it in his autobiography ... I don’t see a way to add a footnote to an article category, so I’m just putting the reference on his talk page for now. It’s not something I made up to vandalise the article. Bossk-Office 23:51, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar 2
Hello,
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar 2. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar 2/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Hkelkar 2/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Newyorkbrad 02:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- Please also note the arbitrators' comments here regarding scheduling matters. Newyorkbrad 02:43, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 30th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 18 | 30 April 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:07, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Suggestion
If I were you I would double-check from someone on ArbCom whether you can resume normal editing; you may have been unblocked just for the case, and to edit the RfArb page. Hornplease 00:11, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
NOTICE
Hey en fant terrible! Listen! Don't put on the tag of converted Hindu on Aashish Khan's page. Instead go for the press release and see what exactly Mr Khan said. Mr Khan emphasised that their origins were Hinduism. That DOES NOT MEAN that he is a converted Hindu. Stop doing nonsensical works. And stop using slangs. Lastly, oil your own machine. Sarodiya 22:04, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Swami Ramdev
Hi Baka;
What's the arbitration procedure on Wiki - looks like Hornplease has no argument other than "look up rules" while he continue to delete and insert edits that include using incorrect English. Thanks
Wikipost
Wikipost 22:29, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 7th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 19 | 7 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:51, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Just to Inform you
You and the number of articles you have successfully submitted to DYK has been noted here because you have been discovered as one of the twenty-five highest DYK article contributors. If you feel compelled to continue to update your number of DYKs on this list, and therefore the list itself, then it would be very helpful and help make sure that the list is as up-to-date as possible. If you, indeed, do not wish to be present on this list, then please notify me, the creator. Regards, —A • D 11:37, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 14th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 20 | 14 May 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:12, 15 May 2007 (UTC)