This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 74.61.41.118 (talk) at 07:03, 12 July 2007 (←Created page with 'How do you quote something. <i>"Encyclopedia Dramatica has a pagerank of about 10,000 by now on Alexa and is still growing in popularity. Is there a reason it isn'...'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 07:03, 12 July 2007 by 74.61.41.118 (talk) (←Created page with 'How do you quote something. <i>"Encyclopedia Dramatica has a pagerank of about 10,000 by now on Alexa and is still growing in popularity. Is there a reason it isn'...')(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)How do you quote something.
"Encyclopedia Dramatica has a pagerank of about 10,000 by now on Alexa and is still growing in popularity. Is there a reason it isn't listed here? 74.61.41.118 05:35, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Lack of reliable sources on it. Wickethewok 05:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- WP:RS talks about the need for sources to support claims made in an article, especially claims which are surprising or significant. WP:V says that the subject of an article can be used as a source for the article itself as long as it satisfies a list of guidelines. What exactly is the contention here, that Encyclopedia Dramatica is not a wiki? That it is not notable? This talk page mentions how Alexa ranking is not always accurate, nor relevant; what about page views, then? Comparing Uncyclopedia's special statistics to... oh @#$%... ED's links are blocked. See: http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Special:Statistics Encyclopedia Dramatica's, it seems likely that ED with over 5x the article views of Uncyclopedia, yet with only 20-30% of the number of articles, has a lot of actual users while Uncyclopedia is a highly edited wiki that no one actually reads."
...copied from Talk:List_of_wikis. Can anyone explain why ED does not have an article? 74.61.41.118 07:03, 12 July 2007 (UTC)