Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by EyeSerene (talk | contribs) at 17:04, 8 August 2007 (→Review: sp). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Useful text

Welcome message

{{subst:w-graphical|Any questions, leave me a note on my ] page and I'll try to help out ;)}}

GA review text

Taken on

I have taken on ] for review under the ], as 
nominated on the ] page by ]. You'll be pleased to 
hear that the article meets none of the ], so I will shortly be 
conducting an in-depth review and will post the results below.
Where an article is not an outright pass, but requires relatively minor additional work to be 
brought up to GA standard, I will normally place it on hold - meaning that editors have around a 
week to address any issues raised. As a precaution to prevent failure by default should this 
occur, if editors are likely to be unavailable over the next ten days or so, feel free to leave 
a message on my ] page so we can arrange a more convenient time for 
review. Regards, ~~~~

Quick fail

I am sorry to inform you that I have ] ] as a 
]. Under the ], a quick-fail 
applies where an article <REASONS>.
If you believe that I have applied the quick-fail criteria inappropriately, or have any other 
concerns about the conduct of this review, you can list ] on the [[WP:GA/R|Good 
article review]] page for discussion by other GA reviewers. Alternatively you may wish to address 
the issues raised above and then renominate the article on the ] 
page. Please also feel free to ] if you have any questions. 
Regards, ~~~~

Quick pass

I am pleased to tell you that ] can be passed in its current form as a 
'''good article''' under the ]. I have listed in on the 
] page under <HEADINGS> and updated any templates on this talk page. For 
the record, the following editors have been identified from the article history as contributing 
significantly (with five or more major edits in the last 50) to this version of the article: 
<small>]</small>. For further improvement in the future, <SUGGESTIONS>.
Congratulations, and well done! ~~~~

Review

I have now reviewed this article under the six ], and have
commented in detail on each criterion below:
1 ''']''' ''PASSFAIL''
1.1 '''Prose'''
*<COMMENT>
1.2 '''Manual of Style'''
*<COMMENT>
2 ''']''' ''PASSFAIL''
*<COMMENT>
3 ''']''' ''PASSFAIL''
*<COMMENT>
4 ''']''' ''PASSFAIL''
*<COMMENT>
5 '''Stability''' ''PASSFAIL''
*<COMMENT>
6 ''']''' ''PASSFAIL''
*<COMMENT>
As a result of the above concerns I have placed the article '''on hold'''. This gives editors up 
to a week to address the issues raised (although in some circumstances the hold period can be 
briefly extended). To help with tracking, editors may like to <s>strike through</s> each comment 
as it is dealt with, or use the template <nowiki>{{done}}</nowiki> after each comment.
Feel free to ] if you have any questions or are ready for a 
re-review. In any case I'll check back here in seven days (<DATE>). All the best, ~~~~

GA pass after hold

Congratulations on an excellent copyedit on the suggestions provided. I have now passed 
] as a Good Article, and listed it as such on the ] page under 
''<HEADINGS>''. For the record, <USER(S)> contributed significantly to this GA pass (with five 
or more major edits in the last 50).
For futher improvement in the future, <SUGGESTIONS>.

GA fail after hold

The '''hold''' period has now expired, and I have reluctantly failed this article because the 
points raised above have not been fully addressed. If you believe that I have applied the fail 
criteria inappropriately, or have any other concerns about the conduct of this review, you can 
list ] on the ] page for discussion by other GA 
reviewers. Alternatively you may wish to address the issues raised above and then renominate the 
article on the ] page. Please also feel free to [[User 
talk:EyeSerene|contact me]] if you have any questions. Regards, ~~~~

Pass message for editor

Congratulations on an excellent copyedit on the suggestions provided. I now have no hesitation 
in passing ] as a Good Article, and have updated the templates on the article talk 
page. You may wish to copy the following template: 
'''<nowiki>{{User Good Article|<ARTICLE>}}</nowiki>''' and paste it to somewhere 
suitable (such as your user page).
It will produce the follwing userbox {{User Good Article|<ARTICLE>}} <br><br><br>and add you to 
the category "Good Article contributors". Well done! ~~~~

Test area