This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SineBot (talk | contribs) at 12:49, 15 December 2007 (Signing comment by Lethargicandstupid - ""). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:49, 15 December 2007 by SineBot (talk | contribs) (Signing comment by Lethargicandstupid - "")(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | Taoism (inactive) | |||
| ||||
"Cracked"
A Code Cracked by C.J.Lofting There is no "solution" to the King Wen Sequence here.
That page confuses me, so it could be a hoax. To "crack" has many meanings, just like "hack". In this case, it means trying to figure out something, even if it doesn't seem to be a riddle, even if it doesn't seem to need solving or decyphering. He mentions the traditional sequence is "1,43,14,34,9,5,26,11", which "seemingly" has nothing to do with binary, but then goes into how the numbering is logical - which is really long that I can't explain or shorten... Well, here is two quotes:
"From this process I have been able to determine that the traditional sequence reflects ALCHEMY with a distinct semantic emphasis on PURE - MIXED"
"Since the moon is also seasonal (as in four to eight phases are used to identify the cycle) so its cycle will map into the I Ching (note that the 384 lines = number of days in a lunar year (13 months))" {sjöar}
"Why"
"There are no instances in which five lines change" this is worth further explanation. Would some kind mathematician expand this please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lethargicandstupid (talk • contribs) 12:47, 15 December 2007 (UTC)