This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Strider12 (talk | contribs) at 23:10, 27 December 2007 (→Sandbox). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

PLEASE DO NOT VANDALIZE THIS PAGE

Feel free to add a section at the bottom of this page (use the + tab at the top of the page, for any comments.

If you wish permission to edit the draft of "Post-abortion syndrome" below please request my permission at the bottom of the page. I do not want any of the POV pushers who are into purging verifiable information to alter this draft. This draft is only for those who truly wish to collaborate on an objective article.

I apologize for a bunch of the nonsense that is still in this version. I have mostly concentrated to date on inserting missing material rather than cleaning up some of the nonsensical inferences which appear to have been inserted by high school students or Planned Parenthood interns.

.

Post-Abortion Syndrome -- An Unpurged Work in Progress

Post-abortion syndrome (PAS), is a highly controversial term first proposed by psychologist Vincent Rue to describe a variant of post-traumatic stress disorder (PAS) where the stressor was a traumatic abortion. The term "post-abortion syndrome", however, has been popularized by opponents of abortion in such a way that it is more generally understood to refer to any negative emotional or psychological reactions to abortion, not just traumatic symptoms.

The American Psychological Association and the American Psychiatric Association do not recognize PAS as a valid diagnosis and it is not included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-IV-TR or ICD-10 list of psychiatric conditions. It has been argued that the concept of abortion causing traumatic reactions is a "myth" created by opponents of abortion for political purposes.

"Post-abortion stress syndrome" (PASS) and "abortion trauma syndrome." are additional terms sometimes used to discuss emotional problems purportedly associated with abortion. For the sake of reference, these terms are also used by those who deny that there any unique emotional problems are in fact caused by abortion.

As PAS, PASS, and "abortion trauma syndrome" are commonly understood to refer to any negative emotional reactions to abortion this article addresses the issue of abortion and mental health in all respects. In doing so, it examines both history and controversy surrounding questions related to abortion and mental health and the peer reviewed studies related to abortion and mental health.

Brief History of the Abortion Mental Health Controversy

American Psychological Association - 1969

In 1969, American Psychological Association Council member Henry P. David proposed the the APA should adopt a postion favoring legalization of abortion as a civil right. The petition was

WHEREAS, termination of unwanted pregnancies is clearly a mental health and child welfare issue, and a legitimate concern of APA; be it resolved, that termination of pregnancy be considered a civil right of the pregnant woman, to be handled as other medical and surgical procedures in consultation with her physician...

At the same time, the APA established the Task Force on Psychology, Family Planning and Population Policy to "(a) to prepare "a review of the current state of psychological research related to family planning and population policy and (b) to make recommendations for encouraging greater research and professional service participation by psychologists in this emerging area of social concern." The Task Force was made up of APA members with an interest in family planning and population control and was instrumental in the establishing in 1974 the APA Division 34 on Population and Environmental Psychology (APA Division 34) The members of this division subsequently contributed information to Surgeon General Koop and published an important review of the literature on abortion and mental health in 1990 (discussed below).

Vincent Rue

In 1981 psychologist and trauma specialist Vincent Rue testified before Congress that he had treated women who had experienced traumatic reactions to abortion resulting in the same type of post-traumatic stress disorder he had treated in VietnNam Vets, with the exception that the stressor in this case was abortion rather than battlefield violence. He proposed the name "Post-Abortion Syndrome" (PAS) and the term was soon picked up and used by abortion opponents to refer to any negative emotional reactions associated with abortion, not just PTSD as Rue had intended it.

Soon after giving this testimony, Rue was threatened with legal action by the general counsel the American Psychiatric Association if any notes he published making reference to the PTSD diagnosis for abortion did not include a specific disclaimer stating that the APA denies that there is "any clinical evidence for the basis of the diagnosis of ‘post-abortion syndrome."

WEBA

Insert material here

Surgeon General Koop's Letter

In 1987 President Reagan directed U.S. Surgeon General, C. Everett Koop to issue a report on the health effects of abortion on women. Koop subsequently began review of over 250 studies pertaining to the physical and psychological impact of abortion. In a letter to President Reagan in January of 1989 Koop stated that he could not issue a conclusive report because the available "scientific studies do not provide conclusive data about the health effects of abortion on women." To address the inadequate research in the field, he recommended a $100 million dollar prospective study would be required to conclusively examine the mental health effects of abortion. In the letter Koop also stated the view that "In the minds of some , it was a foregone conclusion that the negative health effects of abortion on women were so overwhelming that the evidence would force the reversal of Roe vs. Wade." He also noted that while the psychological effects of abortion had not been adequately studied "...doctors had long ago concluded that the physical results of abortion are not major health factors and required little additional study."

In subsequent testimony before a congressional committee regarding his review of the literature, Koop stated that while the scientific studies available at that time were not methodologically sound enough to draw unimpeachable conclusions, "There is no doubt about the fact that some people have severe psychological effects after abortion, but anecdotes do not make good scientific material." In yet a subsequent Congressional hearing, when Koop was pressed to address the question of whether his view of the inadequate studies he had reviewed indicated that abortion posed a public mental health threat, Koop stated that in his opinion it was "miniscule from a public-health perspective."

1987-1990 APA Task Force Review

When Koop was assigned to review information on abortion, he invited input from any individuals and organizations with material to present. The American Psychological Association Division on Population and Environmental Psychology prepared and presented to Koop their own summary of the literature and recommendations for his report. After Koop refused to issue and conclusive findings, division members published a synthesis of their own findings in which they concluded that "The weight of the evidence does not pose a psychological hazard for most women."

The task force concluded that "research with diverse samples, different measures of response, and different times of assessment have come to similar conclusions. The time of greatest distress is likely to be before the abortion. Severe negative reactions after abortions are rare and can best be understood in the framework of coping with normal life stress."

In 2007 APA established a new task force to review studies on abortion published since 1989. The new task force report is expected to be published in 2008.

Julius Fogel

In 1989 Dr. Julius Fogel, who is both a psychiatrist and an obstetrician who had performed over 20,000 abortions, affirmed that in his expert opinion abortion is psychologically traumatic:

Every woman--whatever her age, background or sexuality--has a trauma at destroying a pregnancy. A level of humanness is touched. This is a part of her own life. When she destroys a pregnancy, she is destroying herself. There is no way it can be innocuous. One is dealing with the life force. It is totally beside the point whether or not you think a life is there. You cannot deny that something is being created and that this creation is physically happening.... Often the trauma may sink into the unconscious and never surface in the woman's lifetime. But it is not as harmless and casual an event as many in the proabortion crowd insist. A psychological price is paid. It may be alienation; it may be a pushing away from human warmth, perhaps a hardening of the maternal instinct. Something happens on the deeper levels of a woman's consciousness when she destroys a pregnancy. I know that as a psychiatrist.

Nada Stotland

In a 1992 commentary published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), psychiatrist Nada Stotland of the University of Chicago (who is currently vice president of the American Psychiatric Association) argued "There is no evidence of an abortion-trauma syndrome.” To support her thesis, she cited research showing that only 11% of patients had significant short term emotional problems related to their abortions. Her term "abortion trauma syndrome" was different than that of Rue.

In a subsequent 1998 paper, Stotland describes her surprise at treating a patient experienced a severe delayed reaction to a prior abortion following a a subsequent miscarriage. She reports discovering first-hand "the psychological complexities of induced abortion" and concludes that the failure to address these issues "leaves the person vulnerable to reminders and reenactments, to difficulties that may surface in life and in subsequent psychotherapy." Despite a woman's political or moral views of abortion, she writes, "abortion is experienced by that woman as both the mastery of a difficult life situation and as the loss of a potential life. There is the danger that the political, sociological context can overshadow a woman's authentic, multilayered emotional experience."

Journal of Social Issues Review

In 1992, the Journal of Social Issues dedicated an entire issue to research relating to the psychological effects of elective abortion. In an overview of the contributors papers the editor, Dr. Gregory Wilmoth, concluded: "There is now virtually no disagreement among researchers that some women experience negative psychological reactions postabortion. Instead the disagreement concerns the following: (1) The prevalence of women who have these experiences . . . , (2) The severity of these negative reactions . . . , (3) The definition of what severity of negative reactions constitutes a public health or mental health problem . . . , (4) The classification of severe reactions . . . "

NLSY Studies

Insert material here.

Philip Ney

Insert material here.

Nancy Russo

Nancy Russo is a significant figure in the APA subgroup involved pro-choice advocacy. In a letter in the APA's newsletter responding to the subgroups one sided promotion of pro-choice activism, Russo wrote:

In 1969, APA's Council of Representatives resolved that abortion be considered a "civil right of the pregnant woman." More recently, pro-life misrepresentation of research findings led the council to resolve that APA disseminate scientific information on reproductive issues to policy-makers and the public. Our work is a direct response to that mandate.

Gallagher naïvely assumes findings with implications for women's lives can be "apolitical." Science always reflects the values of scientists--the difference here is that we state our values up front and do not pretend scientific methods make findings value-free....
Finally, the Phillip Morris analogy is inapt. We have no interest, economic or otherwise, in portraying abortion as a risk-free event. A pro-choice position means that we believe abortion is the woman's choice, that women should be given accurate information and informed consent in making their reproductive choices, and that they be supported in their decisions. The charge that this activity, which is congruent with APA policy and conducted in conformance with scientific standards, "undermines the integrity" of APA is without basis.

Russo expressed similar sentiments to a columnist with the Washington Times in dismissing the significance of the Fergusson study: "To pro-choice advocates, mental health effects are not relevant to the legal context of arguments to restrict access to abortion."

Similarly, she told a science reporter from the Toledo Blade newspaper saying "As far as I'm concerned, whether or not an abortion creates psychological difficulties is not relevant...it means you give proper informed consent and you deal with it". In 2005, Russo and Denious described the promotion of post-abortion syndrome as part of a campaign to develop a rationale for suing physicians who provide abortions and thus deterring the provision of legal abortion services. The authors wrote that: "There is no scientific basis for constructing (sic?) abortion as a severe physical or mental health threat," describing as "most worrisome... the publication of deeply flawed studies that contain miscoded data and meaningless findings (e.g., Reardon & Cougle, 2002) which are then used as 'evidence' that abortion is harmful to women."

Reardon and Cougle have denied that their studies are flawed, miscoded, or meaningless and have accused Russo of slanting the findings of her own studies to promote a pro-abortion agenda by recoding the data to exclude women who were pressured into unwanted abortions while also adding women who had subsequent abortion into the control group, omitting mention of a 60% concealment rate, failing to describe a large body of studies, including others done by Russo, which have confirmed a persistent association between abortion and depression, and for exaggeration of the importance of satistically insignificant results.

Brenda Major

Insert review of major studies here.

Priscilla Coleman

Insert review of major studies here.

David M. Fergusson and the APA's Response

In 2006, a team of researchers at the University of Otago Christchurch School of Medicine in New Zealand, published results relating to abortion reactions from a longitudinal study tracking approximately 500 women from birth to 25 years of age. Information was obtained on: a) the history of pregnancy/abortion for female participants over the interval from 15-25 years; b) measures of DSM-IV mental disorders and suicidal behaviour over the intervals 15-18, 18-21 and 21-25 years; and c) childhood, family and related confounding factors. The study concluded that compared to other women in the group those who had an abortion were subsequently more likely to have "mental health problems including depression, anxiety, suicidal behaviours and substance use disorders. This association persisted after adjustment for confounding factors." The authors wrote, "The findings suggest that abortion in young women may be associated with increased risks of mental health problems," and "on the basis of the current study, it is our view that the issue of whether or not abortion has harmful effects on mental health remains to be fully resolved."

The team was led by Professor David Fergusson, a self-described "pro-choice atheist," complained the to press that they had run into political bias at journals which did not want to publish their results, saying they "went to four journals, which is very unusual for us, we normally get accepted the first time."

The team particularly objected to the 2005 position paper by the American Psychological Association which "concluded that ‘well designed studies of psychological responses following abortion have consistently shown that risk of psychological harm is low...the percentage of women who experience clinically relevant distress is small and appears to be no greater than in general samples of women of reproductive age'" According to the researchers, "This relatively strong conclusion about the absence of harm from abortion was based on a relatively small number of studies which had one or more of the following limitations: a) absence of comprehensive assessment of mental disorders; b) lack of comparison groups; and c) limited statistical controls. Furthermore, the statement appears to disregard the findings of a number of studies that had claimed to show negative effects for abortion."

In response to Fergusson's criticisms of the APA, the APA's spokesperson on abortion and a member of the 1989 task force, Dr. Nancy Russo, told a Washington Times reporter that the APA's official position on abortion developed from the viewpoint that abortion is a civil right and that "To pro-choice advocates, mental health effects are not relevant to the legal context of arguments to restrict access to abortion." She further stated her opinion that "pre-existing mental health problems, relationship quality, and whether the pregnancy was wanted or unwanted are key factors determining postabortion mental distress, not the abortion itself," She rejected the significance of Fergusson's study stating: "There has yet to be a well designed study that finds that abortion itself contributes to increased risk for mental health problems," and noted that feelings of guilt and shame after abortion may result from social disapproval and efforts to cast abortion as a moral failing, rather than from the procedure itself. Fergusson resopnded that better research was needed, but that "...the abortion debate and its implications drive out the science."

Subsequent to the New Zealand team's criticisms of its position papers, the APA convened a new task force to publish a new report in 2008 regarding abortion and mental health.

Academic research

THIS SECTION might be more useful if organized around symptoms rather than country in which the study was conducted....but the following is from other contributors on the day I created this file. Leaving as is for now.

A number of studies have examined the relationship between abortion and negative psychological symptoms. While most studies have found an statistical association between abortion and depression, a causal connection has not been proven.

Neutral and positive effects of abortion

Some studies have indicated that women who have undergone abortion have experienced positive or no change to their mental health and well-being. A 1989 study of teenagers who sought pregnancy tests found that counting from the beginning of pregnancy until two years later, the level of stress and anxiety of those who had an abortion did not differ from that of those who had not been pregnant or who had carried their pregnancy to term. Another study in 1992 found that having one abortion was positively associated with higher global self-esteem, particularly feelings of self-worth, capableness, and not feeling one is a failure. It also noted that adverse emotional reactions to the abortion are influenced by pre-existing psychological conditions and other negative factors and, furthermore, that women's well-being was separately and positively related to employment, income, and education, but negatively related to total number of children.

Denmark

A study conducted at University of Copenhagen has shown legal abortion is associated with few adverse effects on sexual function among women in Denmark. The study was conducted among 941 women who chose elective abortion. Among the many statistics of note, the authors wrote, "Diminished libido was experienced by 15.3% at 8 weeks follow-up, and 6.0% experienced diminished orgasm ability (self-rated changes). Libido was unchanged in 72.4% of the women, 69.7% had no change in orgasm ability and 3.3% had never experienced orgasm." The study concluded that "Overall, 51.0% of the women recommenced coitus within 2 weeks after TOP (Termination of Pregnancy). This figure was significantly higher among women aged 18–24 years (60.6%) than among women in higher age groups (41.7–47.8%)."

Finland

A Finnish study has shown a correlation between miscarriage (or spontaneous abortion) with depression and suicide, as well as between medically induced abortion with depression and suicide among women in Finland. The study found that among 8,980 women, "In total, 30 suicides were committed after women gave birth (42% ), 29 after an abortion (40%), and 14 after a miscarriage (19%), of which two were after an extrauterine pregnancy." The study was unable to establish a causal link between abortion and suicide because it was not clear if abortion causes depression and suicide, or if women who are depressed and suicidal are more likely to elect to have an abortion. The article concludes that an "explanation for the higher suicide rate after an abortion could be low social class, low social support, and previous life events or that abortion is chosen by women who are at higher risk for suicide because of other reasons."

Norway

A study in Norway compared the mental distress of women who experienced a spontaneous abortion (miscarriage) and those who had a voluntary abortion. Women who had had a miscarriage exhibited significantly quicker improvement on Impact of Event Scale (IES) scores for avoidance, grief, loss, guilt and anger throughout the observation period. Women who experienced induced abortion had significantly greater IES scores for avoidance and for the feelings of guilt, shame and relief than the miscarriage group after two and five years. Compared with the general population, women who had undergone induced abortion had significantly higher Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) anxiety scores at all four interviews, while women who had had a miscarriage had significantly higher anxiety scores only at ten days. The conclusion of the study showed that women who had experienced a miscarriage experienced more mental distress after 10 days and six months than those who had induced abortions. Furthermore, "The responses of women in the miscarriage group were similar to those expected after a traumatic and sad life event. However, the women in the induced abortion group had more atypical responses. This may be because the mental health of the aborting women was somewhat poorer than that of the miscarrying women before the pregnancy termination event. The more complex nature of the induced abortion event, which includes economic and relationship issues, may also account for differences in the course of psychological responses between the two groups." The study recommended that women be informed about common psychological responses to pregnancy termination and that they be offered talks with health personnel..

South Africa

A study of 155 women seeking voluntary induced abortion sought to investigate whether different forms of pain control had a different effect on pain and psychological distress after the abortion. The researchers examined levels of pain, cortisol levels, and psychological distress in women undergoing surgical termination of pregnancy under local anaesthesia versus intravenous sedation. The authors found that cortisol levels are elevated in women who chose a local anesthetic and that while the choice of anesthetic "does not appear to impact on longer-term psychiatric outcomes or functional status" psychologiclal distress was prevelent among both groups of women. Specifically, they found that 11.4% of women met the criteria for a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) prior to their abortions and that the overal rate of PTSD among the sample rose to 18.2% three months after their abortions, a rise of 61%. However, rates of depression and anxiety were lower after abortion than immediately before. In discussing their findings, the authors write that "Presently the weight of evidence suggests that abortion does not cause lasting negative consequences," but that from their findings regarding mid-term PTSD reactions "t would follow that screening women pre-termination for PTSD and disability and post-termination for high levels of dissociation is important in order to help identify women at risk of PTSD and to provide follow-up care."

Spain

Spanish Social Work researchers claim that some psychopathological characteristics are frequently observed in women who have voluntarily aborted. These include "dreams and nightmares related with the abortion," and "feelings of guilt". Using a cohort of 10 women, Gomez, Lavin C., & Zapata examined ways to categorize PAS under the assumption that it exists and is related to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Abortion is illegal in Spain.

Reactions Associated With Abortion

Although many studies have found a significant statistical association between abortion negative emotional reactions, no irrefutable causal link has been proven to show that abortion itself causes the reactions which are statistically associated with it. In other words, negative reactions may be incidental to abortion, not caused by abortion. It may be that women who are predisposed to have these emotional problems are also more predisposed to have abortions. In any event, the following emotional and mental health problems are statistically associated with abortion.

• Guilt
• Anxiety
• Depression
• Sleep disorders
• Anniversary reactions
• Elevated risk of suicide
• Bi-polar disorder

Peer reviwed studies have shown that some women are more likely than others to report emotional or mental health problems after an abortion. The statistically associated risk factors include:

• Low self-efficacy for coping with the abortion
• Low self-esteem
• External locus of control
• Difficulty with the decision to have an abortion
• When there is emotional investment in the pregnancy
• Perceptions of one's partner, family members, or friends as non-supportive
• Timing during adolescence, being unmarried, or poor
• A poor or insecure attachment relationship with one's mother or a childhood history of separation from one's mother for a year or more before age 16
• Involvement in violent relationships
• Traditional sex-role orientations
• Conservative views of abortion and/or religious affiliation
• When a pregnancy is initially intended
• Abortion during the second trimester
• When the woman is in an unstable partner relationship
• Being forced into abortion by one's partner, others, or by life circumstances

References

1. Vincent Rue, "Abortion and Family Relations," testimony before the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the US Senate Judiciary Committee, U.S. Senate, 97th Congress, Washington, DC (1981).
2. Prior to 1994, the DSM III-R listed abortion as a "psychosocial stressor." Specifically, in Chapter Two, page 20 of that edition, a psychosocial stressor was described to include a "physical illness or injury: e.g., illness, accident, surgery, abortion." Abortion in this context is pregnancy loss before 20 weeks that can be spontaneous or therapeutically induced.
3. ^ Stotland NL. The myth of the abortion trauma syndrome. JAMA. 1992 Oct 21;268(15):2078-9. PMID 1404747.
4. ^ Cooper, Cynthia L. Abortion Under Attack Ms. Magazine
5. http://afterabortion.com/pass_details.html What is PASS?] www.afterabortion.com, an abortion neutral online peer support network, which is not to be confused with nor related to the Elliot Institute's www.afterabortion.org]
6. ^ David, H. "Retrospectives" From APA Task Force to Division 34" Population & Environmental Psychology Bulletin 1999, 25(3):2-3.
7. Abortion and American Psychology Warren Throckmorton, PhD
8. Vincent Rue, "Abortion and Family Relations," testimony before the Subcommittee on the Constitution of the US Senate Judiciary Committee, U.S. Senate, 97th Congress, Washington, DC (1981).
9. See Appendix A,"The Politics of Trauma", in Theresa Burke's Forbidden Grief: The Unspoken Pain of Abortion. (Acorn Books)
10. ^ A copy of the Koop letter to President Reagan ishere.
11. New York Times: Koop Says Abortion Report Couldn't Survive Challenge
12. ^ Adler NE, David HP, Major BN, Roth SH, Russo NF, Wyatt GE. "Psychological responses after abortion." Science, April 1990, 248: 41-44.
13. ^ Abortion and American Psychology Warren Throckmorton, PhD
14. Coleman McCarthy "The Real Anguish of Abortions," The Washington Post, Feb. 5, 1989.
15. Stotland NL.The myth of the abortion trauma syndrome JAMA. 1992 Oct 21;268(15):2078-9.
16. Ibid, citing B. Lask, "Short-term psychiatric sequelae to therapeutic termination of pregnancy," Br J Psychiatry. 1975; 126:173-177 (1975).
17. NL Stotland. Abortion: Social Context, Psychodynamic Implications" Am J Psychiatry, 155(7):964-967, 1998.
18. Wilmoth G. Abortion, Public Health Policy, and Informed Consent Legislation. J Social Issues, 48(3):1-17 (1992).
20. Warren Trockmorton, Washington TImes, "Abortion and mental health" January 21, 2005. reprinted here
21. JENNI LAIDMAN After decades of research, evaluating abortion's effect still difficult Toledo Blade January 22, 2004
22. Russo, Denious. Journal of Social Issues. 2005
23. Study Fails to Address Our Previous Findings and Subject to Misleading Interpretations Reardon, BMJ, Rapid Responses 2005
24. ^ Fergusson, D.M., Horwood, L.J., & Ridden, E.M. (2006. Abortion in young women and subsequent mental health. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(1), 16-24.
25. Ruth Hill, “Abortion Researcher Confounded by Study” New Zealand Herald 1/5/06, See also: Abortion increases mental health risk: study an ABC interview with Fergusson.
26. ^ Warren Throckmorton. "Abortion and mental health."] Washington Times. January 21, 2005.
27. American Psychological Association. "APA research review finds no evidence of 'post-abortion syndrome' but research studies on psychological effects of abortion inconclusive." Press release, January 18, 1989.
28. Zabin, L.S., Hirsch, M.B., Emerson, M.R. (1989). When urban adolescents choose abortion: effects on education, psychological status and subsequent pregnancy. Family Planning Perspectives, 21 (6), 248-55. Retrieved September 8, 2006.
29. Russo, N. F., & Zierk, K.L. (1992). Abortion, childbearing, and women. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 23(4), 269-280. Retrieved September 8, 2006.
30. Sexual behavior during the first eight weeks after legal termination of pregnancy
31. Suicides after pregnancy in Finland, 1987-94: register linkage study
32. ^ The course of mental health after miscarriage and induced abortion: a longitudinal, five-year follow-up study - Norway
33. ^ Suliman S, Ericksen T, Labuschgne P, de Wit R, Stein DJ, Seedat S (2007). "Comparison of pain, cortisol levels, and psychological distress in women undergoing surgical termination of pregnancy under local anaesthesia versus intravenous sedation". BMC Psychiatry. 7: 24. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-7-24. PMID 17565666.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
34. ^ Gomez, Lavin C., & Zapata, Garcia R. (2005). – "Diagnostic categorization of post-abortion syndrome". Actas Esp Psiquiatr, 33 (4), 267-72. Retrieved Setepmber 8, 2006
35. ^ Sexual behavior during the first eight weeks after legal termination of pregnancy
36. ^ Legal abortion: a painful necessity - Sweden
37. Abortion and guilt, France
38. ^ Psychological effects of abortion Portugal
39. Predictors of anxiety and depression following pregnancy termination: a longitudinal five-year follow-up study, Norway
40. DC Reardon and PK Coleman, Treatment Rates for Sleep Disorders and Sleep Disturbances Following Abortion and Childbirth: A Prospective Record Based-Study Sleep 29(1):105-106, 2006.
41. Anniversary reactions and due date responses following abortion.
42. Gissler M. et al.Suicides after pregnancy in Finland, 1987-94: register linkage study. BMJ. 1996 Dec 7;313(7070):1431-4.
43. Reardon DC, Cougle JR, Rue VM, Shuping MW, Coleman PK, Ney PG.Psychiatric admissions of low income women following abortion and childbirth. Can Med Assoc J. CMAJ 2003; 168(10):1253-7.
44. Major, B., Cozzarelli, C., Sciacchitano, A.M., Cooper, M.L., Testa, M., & Mueller, P.M. (1990). Perceived social support, self-efficacy, and adjustment to abortion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 186-197.
45. Cozzarelli, C., Karrasch, A., Sumer, N., & Major, B. (1994). The meaning and impact of partner's accompaniment on women's adjustment to abortion. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 2028-2056.
46. Cozzarelli, C. (1993). Personality and self-efficacy as predictors of coping with abortion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1224-1236.
47. Bracken, M.B. (1978). A causal model of psychosomatic reactions to vacuum aspiration abortion. Social Psychiatry, 13, 135-145.
48. Osofsky, J.D., & Osofsky, H.J. (1972). The psychological reaction of patients to legalized abortion. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 42, 48-60.
49. Lyndon, J., Dunkel-Schetter, C., Cohan, C.L., & Pierce, T. (1996). Pregnancy decision making as a significant life event: A commitment approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 141-151.
50. Remennick, L.I., & Segal, R. (2001). Sociocultural context and women's experiences of abortion: Israeli women and Russian immigrants compared. Culture, Health, and Sexuality, 3, 49-66.
51. Major et al. (1990).
52. Major, B., & Cozzarelli, C. (1992). Psychological predictors of adjustment to abortion. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 121-142.
53. Adler, N.E. (1975). Emotional responses of women following therapeutic abortion: How great a problem? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 6, 240-259.
54. Bracken, M.B., Hachamovitch, M., & Grossman, G. (1974). The decision to abort and psychological sequelae. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 158, 155-161.
55. Campbell, N., Franco, K., & Jurs, S. (1988). Abortion in adolescence. Adolescence, 23, 813-823.
56. Cozzarelli, C., Sumer, N., & Major, B. (1998). Mental models of attachment and coping with abortion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 453-467.
57. Kitamura, T., Toda, M.A., Shima, S., & Sugawara, M. (1998). Single and repeated elective abortions in Japan: A psychosocial study. Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 19, 126-134.
58. Payne, E., Kravitz, A., Notman, M., & Anderson, J. (1976). Outcome following therapeutic abortion. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33, 725-733.
59. Allanson, S., & Astbury, J. (2001). Attachment style and broken attachments: Violence, pregnancy, and abortion. Australian Journal of Psychology, 53, 146-151.
60. Russo, N., & Denious, J.E. (2001). Violence in the lives of women having abortions: Implications for policy and practice. Professional Psychology Research and Practice, 32, 142-150.
61. Gold, D., Berger, C., & Andres, D. (1979). The abortion choice: Psychological determinants and consequences. Concordia University, Department of Psychology, Montreal.
62. Bogen, I. (1974). Attitudes of women who have had abortions. Journal of Sex Research, 10, 97-109.
63. Osofsky & Osofsky (1972)
64. Soderberg, H., Janzon, L., & Slosberg, N.-O. (1998). Emotional distress following induced abortion: A study of its incidence and determinants among adoptees in Malmo, Sweden. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 79, 173-178.
65. Ashton, J. (1980). The psychosocial outcome of induced abortion. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 87, 1115-1122.
66. Friedman, C., Greenspan, R., & Mittleman, F. (1974). The decision-making process and the outcome of therapeutic abortion. American Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 1332-1337.
67. Lazarus, A. (1985). Psychiatric sequelae of legalized first trimester abortion. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 4, 141-150.
68. Major, B., Mueller, P., & Hildebrandt, K. (1985). Attributions, expectations, and coping with abortion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 585-599.
69. Miller, W.B. (1992). An empirical study of the psychological antecedents and consequenes of induced abortion. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 67-93.
70. Anthanasiou, R., Oppel, W., Michelson, L., Unger, T., & Yager, M. (1973). Psychiatric sequelae to term birth and induced early and late abortion: A longitudinal study. Family Planning Perspectives, 5, 227-231.
71. Llewellyn, S.P., & Pytches, R. (1988). An investigation of anxiety following termination of pregnancy. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 51, 468-471.
72. Soderberg, H., Andersson, C., Janzon, L., & Slosberg, N.-O. (1997). Continued pregnancy among abortion applicants. A study of women having a change of mind. Act Obstetrica Gynecologica Scandinavia, 76, 942-947.
73. Söderberg H, Janzon L, Sjöberg NO. Emotional distress following induced abortion: a study of its incidence and determinants among abortees in Malmö, Sweden. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998 Aug;79(2):173-8.
74. Friedman, et. al (1974)

MISC

User page and other things

Sorry for disrupting your version of article again. Please take your time to read Misplaced Pages:User page#What may I not have on my user page?, which discourages "material that can be construed as attacking other editors, including the recording of perceived flaws" on user pages. There is one exception, however, which is dispute resolution, which is always welcome. Quite frankly, I am not too pleased to be quoted as an example of "editors openly advocating the purging of material from peer reviewed journals simply because abortion proponents have accused the authors of bias" or your referring to editors as "high school students or Planned Parenthood interns."

I have not quoted you as an example of anything other than what you wrote, which was to encourage 131.216.41.16 to purge verifable material. If you regret that, why not declare the past efforts to exclude material an error and start supporting the inclusion of all peer reviewed material so we can COLLABORATE in creating an article that is as complete as possible?

Also keep in mind that this is not your place to indefinitely archive your preferred version. I place emphasis on "indefinitely" because you are always welcome to experiment or make changes for future. However, if you keep it there for too long, it may be subject to deletion. миражinred 00:32, 27 December 2007 (UTC) AKA: Saranghae honey, mirageinred

I believe I am free to work with others on this page. As it is a work in progress, it is not an archive. Thanks for stalking me.--Strider12 (talk) 15:03, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

You have said earlier "mirageinred and 131.216.41.16 have openly talked on this page about 'purging.'" And it seems like you are using this space to store your "work in progress" or your preferred version. Again, please show some civility. Thanks. миражinred 21:57, 27 December 2007 (UTC)