This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hrafn (talk | contribs) at 02:58, 29 January 2008 (templates). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:58, 29 January 2008 by Hrafn (talk | contribs) (templates)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | The topic of this article may not meet Misplaced Pages's notability guideline for books. Please help to demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention. If notability cannot be shown, the article is likely to be merged, redirected, or deleted. Find sources: "The Sense of Being Stared At" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (January 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
 | This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "The Sense of Being Stared At" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (January 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
The Sense of Being Stared At is 2003 book by Rupert Sheldrake.
Synopsis
Sheldrake is a UK scientist whose theory of Morphogenic fields is considered to be a pseudoscience by many recognized scientists in specific disciplines. The book is primarily an exposition of this theory with a presentation of the experimental examination of the specific titular phenomenon as support.
The neologism "seventh sense" is introduced to contrast to the normal connotation of "sixth sense" a "sixth sense" which is grounded is some speculative scientific semi-hypothesis, in this case, morphogenic fields. Chapters 8 and 11 summarize the phenonmenon in question and the experimental results found by the author respectively.
The Phenomenon Itself (Ch. 8)
Begins with stories of persons who claimed that the phenomenon saved their lives. Authors surveys and those of others give ranges of 70 to ninety percent of respondents claiming personal experience of it. Various literary examples are cited.
Sensing the Direction From Which the Gaze is Coming
Author cites 97% incidence of directionality in his case study database and recounts various anecdotal testimony for same.
Making People Turn Around
Similar to previous, 83% incidence of report of effectiveness in producing a reaction in the person stared at.
Sensitivity of Different Parts of the Body
Anecdotal reports of specificity of the phenomenon to a focus on a particular part of the body of the person stared at.
The Details of Peoples Experiences
A summary of various details of the phenomenon such as type of person stared at, nature of the interest on the part of the person who stares, etc. presented in Appendix B.
Objections
Three standard counter arguments:
- Dismissal of the phenomenon as superstition.
- Subtle but ordinary clues (not requiring operation of any more than 5 senses).
- Combination of blind chance and selectivity.
The Experimental Results (Ch. 11 )
Prior Studies
The first studies by E. B. Tichener and J. Edgar Coover gave negative results, i.e. confirmed one or more of the counter arguments.
Authors Research
The essential design of the authors experiments contrast chance reporting in the case where no one is actually staring vs. the staring case, in a manner similar to other telepathy experiments as refined based on his own experimental designs and those of others.
Pattern of Results
The difference between the control case and the live one generally are a statistically significant 10% by the authors work, those of others, and even under a reanalysis of the Prior Studies to the design framework.
Outline
- Part I: Telepathy
- Part II: The Power of Attention
- Part III: Remote Viewing and Foreshadowings of the Future
- Part Iv: How Does the Seventh Sense Work?
Notes
- Sheldrake, Rupert (2003). The Sense of Being Stared At. Crown. ISBN 0-609-60807-X.
- Coover, J.E. (1913). "The feeling of being stared at". American Journal of Psychology (24): 570–5.