This is an old revision of this page, as edited by YellowMonkey (talk | contribs) at 02:05, 30 January 2008 (→Clem Hill: click click). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:05, 30 January 2008 by YellowMonkey (talk | contribs) (→Clem Hill: click click)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)User:Daniel/Icons User:Daniel/Header User talk:Daniel/Header
Archives
This page was last archived on Monday, January 28. The most recent comments can be found in Archive 58. For a complete list of archives, please see here. If you wish to leave me a new message, please click here. Cheers, Daniel (talk) 05:28, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Clem Hill
Hi Daniel. I though I would take you up on your offer here. If you have the time and the inclination could you take a look at the article on one of South Australia's greatest cricketing sons. A copy-edit would be great but any advice etc. would be much appreciated. Cheers, Mattinbgn\ 02:23, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Most certainly - I'll print it out and read over it, and get back to you hopefully on Wednesday. Daniel (talk) 05:27, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Click click photos? Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:05, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Template:Clerk-Note-S
A tag has been placed on Template:Clerk-Note-S requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 00:32, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oh lulz... :) /me watches Daniel go in a rage because someone dared templating him ;) — DarkFalls 00:45, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hmmmm, do we need to head off to ArbCom for this?! Ryan Postlethwaite 00:50, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- That'll be no good since Daniel will be an arbitrator... *secretly noms Daniel for arbitration* — DarkFalls 01:32, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- Even if the community was misguided enough to support me, I like having some semblance of a life :) Daniel (talk) 05:28, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- This is the ultimate O RLY moment. Dihydrogen Monoxide (party) 07:53, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- Even if the community was misguided enough to support me, I like having some semblance of a life :) Daniel (talk) 05:28, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- That'll be no good since Daniel will be an arbitrator... *secretly noms Daniel for arbitration* — DarkFalls 01:32, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hmmmm, do we need to head off to ArbCom for this?! Ryan Postlethwaite 00:50, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
OK but...
I have. I don't think you should have protected at all, because the content was changing with each edit. Protection has failed to resolve lengthy disputes relating to this article before. I am also concerned that deletion of material, against consensus and verging on vandalism, has been endorsed by protection. Grant | Talk 09:57, 29 January 2008 (UTC)