Misplaced Pages

User talk:QuackGuru

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CorticoSpinal (talk | contribs) at 02:19, 13 February 2008 (Credibility: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 02:19, 13 February 2008 by CorticoSpinal (talk | contribs) (Credibility: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome!

Hello QuackGuru! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Cool Cosmos 20:28, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous
...

http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Chiropractic#copyright_violation Copyright violation. Is anyone reading this? QuackGuru (talk) 01:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Credibility

You have been exposed, GQ. You have blatantly deceived all the editors on the chiropractic and other CAM pages you edit by suggesting that you did not write, insert and try to maintain your original research. Your practice styles section is a direct text dump from many sites. You even admitted to authoring it yourself on your chirotalk forum.

Your profound ties to quackwatch, chirobase and stephen barrett leave little room for you contribute in an honest and constructive manner on the chiropractic page. Many experienced editors have questioned your ability to work towards a consensus, and your continuous attempts to cite quackwatch and stephen barrett as scholarly equivalent research is disingenius to say the least. Please refrain from wikistalking me and suggest that you move to a more productive and cooperative style. Thanks. EBDCM (talk) 02:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

User talk:QuackGuru Add topic