Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Paul Erik (talk | contribs) at 06:36, 6 July 2008 (→AfD setups: another). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to my talk page. Please respect Misplaced Pages:Talk page guidelines. Thank you.

Welcome...

Hello, JBsupreme, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
• How to edit a page
• Help
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Bash Kash (talk) 20:17, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

deprod of Song Baek Kyoung

Deprodding of Song Baek Kyoung

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Song Baek Kyoung, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion. Thanks! TJRC (talk) 22:11, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Rick ross (rapper)

On the Rick Ross (rapper) page you changed the links at the bottom back after i had edited them?. The so called official rick ross trilla website is not anything related to rick ross any more its been used for advertising for a while now.--Front2back (talk) 18:33, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

You are correct and I have fixed that link. JBsupreme (talk) 20:41, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

noble dru & phashara pages

please advise on the corrections that should be made to prevent the pages from being marked for deletion. Kirkout (talk) 16:40, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

GZA

It'll expire later today. If the idiots start up again, I'll put it to semi. DS (talk) 17:45, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.(Planecrash111 (talk) 00:59, 28 June 2008 (UTC))

Once again I warn you for deleting content on Jeff Gordon without stating a reason why in the edit summary. The edit was very constructive and it was very disruptive of you to do this again. This time let the warning stay.(Planecrash111 (talk) 00:59, 28 June 2008 (UTC))

No content was deleted except for the results table that Planecrash111 needlessly deleted himself. It looks like your edit was just fixing a format error that an anonymous editor caused. This is not the first time Planecrash111 has given out warnings to people for no reason, so don't take any notice. Bretonbanquet (talk) 01:27, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

In addition to that, Planecrash111 is known to use sockpuppets for vandalism, and then correct the errors himself and hand out warnings. Then he claims his "brother did it". To be honest, I'm surprised he isn't blocked indefinitely at this stage. So yeah, all messages from this troll are taken with many, many grains of salt. JBsupreme (talk) 19:19, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Groundlings

Saw your wholesale slaughter of Groundlings alumni :-) Your explanation went over my uninformed head. "Obviated by cats"? Can you explain? For what it's worth, I thought the list of alumni was quite useful. Monkeyzpop (talk) 08:16, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Sorry for the shorthand, cats meaning categories. By the way would you be able to help source this article? JBsupreme (talk) 08:17, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

I figured that's what cats meant, but I don't know how it affects the situation here. How does the article having categories mean it shouldn't list alumni? As to sourcing the article, I could be some help but no help. By that I mean I know a fair amount about the group but only because I know people involved. That would be OR. I don't off-hand know of good published sources. Could dig some, I suppose. Thanks.Monkeyzpop (talk) 10:11, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

100 Miles & Running

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to 100 Miles & Running, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --AW (talk) 14:55, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

If you would like a response to this please try leaving a non generic template on my talk page. The mix tape is not notable, whereas the N.W.A. single clearly is, which is why it was redirected. I have placed a prod on the article since you've reverted my edit. JBsupreme (talk) 14:56, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD setups

Hi JBsupreme. Hope you don't mind, but I've gone ahead a fixed a couple of your AfD pages. When you set up an AfD, please be sure to follow all the steps at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion#How to list pages for deletion. Thanks! Paul Erik 04:09, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Paul Erik! I'll review the info. JBsupreme (talk) 06:11, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi JB. I fixed two more of your AfD setups. Please be sure to follow all the steps; otherwise, your deletion discussions are not showing up in the appropriate categories. Thanks. Paul Erik 18:23, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

When you have time can you please review Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Yung Ro I think I see what was missing now. JBsupreme (talk) 18:36, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

That one looks good! Cheers, Paul Erik 18:41, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Do you mind if I ask: What trouble are you having with the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion#How to list pages for deletion? I fixed another one for you. Paul Erik 06:36, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Edit summaries are strongly encouraged for all edits, but they are required when adding an AFD or PROD tag to an article. Edits such as this and this come off as a bit sneaky without an edit summary. Please use them as often as possible, but especially when nominating articles for deletion. Kafziel 17:10, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

dude, seriously. JBsupreme (talk) 05:55, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Um, assuming that's your way of asking where it says that...

• At WP:PROD, step 2 of how to nominate an article: "Use an informative edit summary clearly indicating that the article has been nominated for deletion."
• at WP:AFD, step 1 of how to list an article for deletion: "Please include in the edit summary the phrase AfD: Nominated for deletion; see ]."
• And there's always this, too.

I hope that clears it up, if it was unclear to begin with. If I misunderstood what you meant with the above, feel free to elaborate. Kafziel 06:17, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

While we're at it...

This is by no means a minor edit, and should not have been marked as such. A minor edit is a version that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Like the above, it makes your edits seem a bit sneaky. If you feel the need to try to hide your edits, maybe that should make you think twice about the changes you're making. Kafziel 06:25, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Stop stalking my edits or you will be reported. JBsupreme (talk) 06:34, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm not stalking you. I'm an admin, and I'm trying to help. Believe me, this is me being nice. Kafziel 06:44, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Donna Summer

An editor Mhathaway removed material not referenced then put in very negative unreferenced material which I removed. He or She had an agenda .72.225.239.152 (talk) 06:06, 5 July 2008 (UTC)