Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/The Roadents

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Imnotacoolguy (talk | contribs) at 05:52, 24 October 2008 (→The Roadents). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Delete Article/Stub reads like an advertisment. As do most of this users Articles... Imnotacoolguy (talk) 22:58, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Comment: None of my articles are advertisements and it doesn't matter if it's a stub! Schuym1 (talk) 23:51, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
- Why do you think my articles are advertisements? Most of my articles are about films and books that I haven't seen or read! Schuym1 (talk) 23:55, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Keep. Non-trivial web presence indicates the show's got a following. The stub doesn't read like an advertisement to me, and mild irritation with a fellow editor's writing style - on a stub, no less! - is not a criterion for deletion. Let's not get itchy trigger fingers here. Fumoses (talk) 00:02, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Keep Not at all an advert. Perfectly acceptable stub and externals show notability. Schmidt, 00:34, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Comment: I found another source. Schuym1 (talk) 00:38, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- I found another one. Schuym1 (talk) 00:45, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
  - And another one. Schuym1 (talk) 00:53, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
  - If you want to view the LA Times link, do a google search for it. Schuym1 (talk) 01:21, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
    - I added two comments from LA Times and Tilzy TV to the critical acclaim section. Schuym1 (talk) 01:26, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
    - The link to the LATimes article is broken. Could not find an LA Times article when searching with Google. Looks like this link was to a Blog anyway. What makes that a reliable source? ::::