Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Icsunonove (talk | contribs) at 06:59, 19 January 2009 (→Icsunonove). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives

Meet The Press /Archive/2009/January

This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Forsena

I really can't believe what kind of garbage I found here about me . You did not mention that the user you are mentioning Angelo De La Paz (I still say he is a POV editor because he was and he will always be, just take a look at his edits) insulted me many times (called me a Serbian vandal and a nationalist fanatic) before I even knew anything about him. Of course when I answered you used that as an argument to ban me. What you didn't mention was that the user insulted me first, created POV edits (which he later reverted). One more thing, if you warned me I would have listened to your warning but I DO NOT CARE for the warnings of an Albanian extremist who insults me and then warns me for reverting his POV edits. Your block really shocked me and proved to me that Serbophobia is spread on Misplaced Pages too. --Forsena (talk) 19:31, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Please see ]. Gerardw (talk) 22:27, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Removal of message

It was removed because telling people to go elsewhere isn't a solution, like I briefed in the edit summary. Also it could be considered spamming.--Otterathome (talk) 23:07, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

That was quick! Thanks so much. Any suggestions for DYK? We could try for that just for George. :) Julia Rossi (talk) 02:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

No matter, I'll tackle it – so that's how recent changes goes (I learned something new). You have my respect, :) Julia Rossi (talk) 03:14, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

3rr

I noticed this - the edits in question were nearly a day ago, and the other editor has retired. How then, is Noclador 'currently engaged in an edit war'? — neuro 03:46, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

3 reverts in a 24 hour period, listed below. Gerardw (talk) 03:57, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

That was not my point. My point was that the editor was in no way 'currently engaged in an edit war'. — neuro 12:31, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Steinerner Steg

Hi Gerardw, you're a bit mistaken. I did a single revert within the last 24 hours and the article hasn't changed for over 13 hours. Also the user that caused all this commotion (user:Icsunonove) and edited against all other editors involved is currently at the centre of this inccident report: Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Icsunonove and IP 192.45.72.26 and additionally two Wikiquette alerts Misplaced Pages:Wikiquette_alerts#user:Icsunonove Misplaced Pages:Wikiquette_alerts#user:Icsunonove II. Therefore I removed your notice on my talkpage. --noclador (talk) 03:48, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

1

2

3 Gerardw (talk) 03:54, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

that was 2 days ago, not "You currently appear to be engaged..." There was no 3RR vio. there will be no 3RR vio. so, unnecessary warning and btw. the book is wrong and that is verifiable. --noclador (talk) 04:57, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Icsunonove

I went to the noticeboard and re-read his accusations again from top to bottom. It is clear to me what is going on now. I'd appreciate it if you look at my responses in bold. I was making valid corrections to wikilinks, and he used this to accuse me of 'italianization' and all-out slander me. Nice... :) Icsunonove (talk) 00:56, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

If you're asking my advice, I'd go back to AN/I and lose the bold. Then strikethrough the Mussolini reference and the like. No third party editor or admin really wants to sort through a lot of mudslinging. Focus on specific, verifiable actions in as neutral a tone as possible. The best advice for the more outlandish statements, such as "You have 3 Wikiquette alerts," is to ignore them. Calm is best, if hard sometimes. Gerardw (talk) 02:06, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Yes, though that part was a bit comical of him telling everyone I had so many alerts -- all that he was posting. Anyway, I will make the changes you suggest. I also want to remove these references of him trying to search where i live and work. That is obviously out of context in this discussion, smells of stalking (!!), and I've already said 192.x.x.x is the IP I use. Thanks for the advice; I REALLY do appreciate it after being treated this way by this individual. Icsunonove (talk) 04:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

• I've done as you suggested. I've also removed him trying to state where I live and work (which he has wrong so far, but beside the point). That is obviously out of place in the discussion, and if he continues that I would like you do please handle that as an Admin. Also, if he continues to try and expose information on users here, I'd like to know how to formerly report him for that for a perm. ban. Obviously if users try to stalk others in real life, that is a major issue for Misplaced Pages. Icsunonove (talk) 04:22, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

For the record about this abstruse concoction of stalking: I copied two lines from two sources- namely: Icsunonove user page and Icsunonove IP page. --noclador (talk) 06:29, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Oh no you most certainly did not. :-) You added more than that, you were trying to identify corporations and cities in california as well. I said I use that IP, and I also made valid and proper edits from that IP. You still try to re-add what may be personal information. That amounts to stalking, and is very serious on Misplaced Pages. That you are in such fear of me trying to eradicate South Tyrol by FIXING bloody wikilinks, dude, those are personal insecurities you must seriously evaluate. I have made it one of my goals on here to make sure we preserve all the history, languages, and names of Italian provinces. I am indeed sorry you can't realize that, but then again, how poorly you misread this overall situation might point to a general trend. Hey Gerardw, sorry for thinking you were an Admin, your advice was very Admin'ish. :) Icsunonove (talk) 06:59, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Krayeske

GerardW

Obviously, everyone thinks what happened to them is important. While the entry about me in Governor M. Jodi Rell's wiki page was unsourced, plenty on the internet exists to verify what occurred. http://www.the40yearplan.com/Ken_Krayeske_InauguRell_Arrest_Story_Repository.php If you don't trust my resository, go here: http://www.ctnewsjunkie.com/mt/mt-ctnj.cgi?IncludeBlogs=1&search=ken+krayeske or for the original story: http://www.ctnewsjunkie.com/courts/reporter_arrested_for_politica.php or ctlocalpolitics, which is a prominent political bulletin board in Connecticut. http://ctlocalpolitics.net/?s=ken+krayeske+arrest or even the New York Times. http://query.nytimes.com/search/sitesearch?query=ken+krayeske&srchst=cse

Additionally, what exactly is your bar for determining what is important? Is the state police jailing a non-violent political opponent of the governor on trumped up charges important? Whether in a developing nation or the United States of America, I tend to think that it is valid to note that an executive law enforcement agency overseen by a sitting governor was involved in harassing and intimidating a political opponent. Is important the front page of a newspaper? Multiple days on major local television news? In reading the Misplaced Pages references on notability, it seems to me that this incident meets the bar for notability.

I think it is valid and wise to include this. I think it does a disservice to the readers of Misplaced Pages to eliminate references to the consequences of the Governor's rule. To that end, I will reinclude it.

Thanks, Ken Krayeske Ken _at_ the40yearplan.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.186.141.212 (talk) 18:33, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Discussion belongs here. Suggest you review WP:COI. Gerardw (talk) 18:48, 18 January 2009 (UTC)