This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) at 13:26, 11 February 2009 (Archiving 1 thread(s) (older than 7d) to User talk:Daedalus969/Archive 10.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:26, 11 February 2009 by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 1 thread(s) (older than 7d) to User talk:Daedalus969/Archive 10.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) PDT)Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an anonymous editor, I will reply here.
|
Archives | ||||||||
|
||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Talkback
Hello, Daedalus969. You have new messages at Livitup's talk page.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
tb
Hello, Daedalus969. You have new messages at roux's talk page. |
You can remove this notice at any time by removing this template. |
Thanks for dealing with the vandalism at Troy Davis case
Just wanted to say thanks. Have a great Christmas. Josh Atkins has smiled at you!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Your speedy deletion nomination of Mob Wars
Just a couple of pointers about WP:CSD eligibility and tagging.
- A7 only applies if the article does not assert notability and in the words of the policy "does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source". In this instance notability was asserted and more than that was supported by reliable sources.
- Any editor (other than the creator of the article) may remove a speedy deletion tag as Mr Vernon did and the appropriate response to that would have been to WP:PROD or WP:AFD. Just undoing his edit was inappropriate and out of policy.
- The article was ineligible for speedy tagging in the first place as a speedy on the same grounds had already declined a few months ago. Again the appropriate action would have been to PROD of AFD. You should always check the article history before nominating for speedy regardless of its age.
Speedy deletion is both an extremely vital but also potentially extremely damaging element of Misplaced Pages and any nomination must be carefully considered and researched before placing a tag. If in doubt don't do it. Consider a WP:PROD or WP:AFD instead - unless an article is a copyvio or an attack page having it hang around for another five days is not going to harm anyone and if such caution prevents an editor being disillusioned and leaving the project or if it prevents a valid article being deleted then all the better. Kind regards, Nancy 09:51, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages Signpost, February 8, 2009
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 5, Issue 6 | 8 February 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 21:42, 9 February 2009 (UTC)