User talk:Nutriveg - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Frankie0607 (talk | contribs) at 14:35, 20 April 2009 (Message re. Prostate cancer (HG)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 14:35, 20 April 2009 by Frankie0607 (talk | contribs) (Message re. Prostate cancer (HG))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome to Misplaced Pages!

Hello Nutriveg, and Welcome to Misplaced Pages!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! MMXX 20:13, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Misplaced Pages How to edit a page
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page
How you can help
Contributing to Misplaced Pages Community Portal Follow Misplaced Pages etiquette Practice civility

Your recent edits

You removed tons of information (which is possibly vandalism), and your edit summary was not clear. Please enter in a better edit summary. Thank you. Vernon (Versus22) (talk) 16:58, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Bot external report site offline.Undid revision 257929121 by ClueBot is not good enough for an edit summary. You did not say you moved it until after my revert. Vernon (Versus22) (talk) 17:01, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Information was moved from an article to another. Reasoning was explicit in those articles contents . Numbers of lines on a single article is not everything, watch out before making false accusations based on shallow guesses.Nutriveg (talk) 17:10, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

But you said that after my edit. Your edit summary before my revert was not clear. Because of that, I thought it was vandalism (by a very large removal of content). After all it says: "If you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary.", which did not happen by the time of my revert. I will continue to watch my edits, and hopefully you can enter in a better edit summary. Vernon (Versus22) (talk) 17:24, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Again, please do not remove large sections of articles without an edit summary and/or note on the talk page. Providing such will ensure that your edits are not perceived as accidents or vandalism. Also, when creating any article, including spin offs, it is important to follow the Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style. In this case Misplaced Pages:Layout and Misplaced Pages:Footnotes are of particular importance. I've fixed the most obvious migration errors, but I suggest that you familiarize yourself with the above pages. --DO11.10 (talk) 21:44, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Zineb

I see you added the latest banning orders fron EU. Looking at the refs you supplied it does not mention Zineb but does mention maneb and mancozeb, which seems strange to me as the active ingredient is generally agreed to be the dithiocarbamate ligand, which is present in all three. Am I missing something here or have the legislators? --Axiosaurus (talk) 10:38, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Zineb is not listed in list of the examined substances, I think they missed it.--Nutriveg (talk) 11:52, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. Perhaps Zineb was banned previously- if it hasn't been it should be examined - must try to find anything about it. I must get round to adding something on dithiocarbamate health issues- compounds containing them have been used in large quantities worldwide.--Axiosaurus (talk) 12:02, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Mentorship suggestion

I've been informed of your WP:WQA thread, and I have added some points there. I'll only repeat here that I think you have made some very good contributions and citation additions, but have some concerns for other poorer edits. If you would like to discuss this further then I'm happy to do so - would feedback on your edits (without obligation) be helpful/welcomed ? If not, perhaps consider this of another editor whom you respect (or see Misplaced Pages:Mentorship#Voluntary mentorship). Yours David Ruben 04:20, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

No. If some of my edits are poor is because of I don't have enough time to do better ones, go improve them instead.--Nutriveg (talk) 20:32, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Alzheimer

I have given the reasons for the elimination in the talk page. I hope you join the disccussion. Bests.--Garrondo (talk) 15:24, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

April 2009

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit you made to the page Prostate cancer has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Frankie0607 14:35, 20 April 2009 (UTC)