This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CaliforniaAliBaba (talk | contribs) at 16:13, 17 August 2009 (→Elşad Xose: WP:NOTINTERESTING). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:13, 17 August 2009 by CaliforniaAliBaba (talk | contribs) (→Elşad Xose: WP:NOTINTERESTING)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Elşad Xose
- Elşad Xose (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable Lida Vorig (talk) 05:48, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable, at least not in the English WP. McMarcoP (talk) 08:15, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- There is no such thing as "not notable in English". Non-English sources are perfectly acceptable under WP policy. Please see WP:NOTENGLISH. cab (talk) 15:12, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- Comment. I know what you mean, maybe I phrased my comment wrong. I meant - this page is of no interest for a non-Azerbaijani. Unless I am proved wrong, of course. McMarcoP (talk) 15:45, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- Er, WP:NOTINTERESTING? =) cab (talk) 16:13, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- Comment. I know what you mean, maybe I phrased my comment wrong. I meant - this page is of no interest for a non-Azerbaijani. Unless I am proved wrong, of course. McMarcoP (talk) 15:45, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- There is no such thing as "not notable in English". Non-English sources are perfectly acceptable under WP policy. Please see WP:NOTENGLISH. cab (talk) 15:12, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 15:11, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- Keep, notability has already been demonstrated prior to this nomination through the citation of multiple non-trivial newspaper articles about the subject. cab (talk) 15:11, 17 August 2009 (UTC)