This is an old revision of this page, as edited by LessHeard vanU (talk | contribs) at 20:34, 24 September 2009 (→ANI notice: please retract the legal threat, lest this account be blocked from editing futher). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:34, 24 September 2009 by LessHeard vanU (talk | contribs) (→ANI notice: please retract the legal threat, lest this account be blocked from editing futher)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)September 2009
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Template:Roadies, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- Rsrikanth05 (talk) 15:07, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
I do not know how to reply to your message, but if it reaches you, well, I know what I am doing. I work at MTV. Can pass on my official ID to you to have a conversation with me. Thanks.Superduperblah (talk) 15:41, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Basket of Puppies 19:54, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
I do not know how to reply to your message, but if it reaches you, well, I know what I am doing. I work at MTV. Can pass on my official ID to you to have a conversation with me. Thanks
- I very strongly suggest that you read the following link; Misplaced Pages:No legal threats. Editing Misplaced Pages and advising others who edit the encyclopedia that you are pursuing legal remedies against them is not permitted. You are free to do either, but not both. Should you fail to promptly retract the threat of legal action then this account will be blocked from editing until you do - which would be a pity because the article in question clearly needs some good neutral encyclopedic editing. I recommend you consider your next edit very carefully indeed. LessHeard vanU (talk) 20:34, 24 September 2009 (UTC)