This is an old revision of this page, as edited by WhatamIdoing (talk | contribs) at 21:14, 3 October 2009 (→Road....: c). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:14, 3 October 2009 by WhatamIdoing (talk | contribs) (→Road....: c)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome!
Hello, Vanisheduser5965, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Jokestress (talk) 22:53, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
ENDA
Sorry DarlieB. Trans folks have been left at the curb nearly every step by nearly every LGBT group at one point or another. The ENDA was just a mess to begin with and a last ditch effort, IMHO, to get anything on the books. Why they though it would work is really beyond me but Frank is quite the genius at getting things done so I credit him for trying. I suggest working on the ENDA article itself if that's where your interest lies or pick other articles especially about people and subject you really enjoy. It will be a little bit more pleasant for you and you can get more familiar with how Misplaced Pages works while researching subjects that aren't as stressful. -- Banjeboi 16:03, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Talk:The Man Who Would Be Queen
There is a template on the top of the page in question advising all parties to confine their discussion to the material of the article. Your commentary has rather frequently been in violation of those talk page guidelines, and I believe your comments would be much better received if you were to actually follow the rules of talk pages, as per WP:TPG. I look forward to seeing your future comments more in keeping with the existing guidelines. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 13:59, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
- I appreciate your concern over my ability to contribute to TMWWBQ. In normal circumstances I would agree and continue but I'm afraid this article being edited by Dr Bailey's co-workers and supporters degrades it beyond being worth working on . It's no more than a sham set up to try and clear the good doctor of charges that have left his career in a shambles. My editing is against that sacred purpose and as such no matter what I did to improve the article and it will be removed . It is filled with false facts ( probably put back in by now ) , lies and blatant exclusions and manipulation of truth . When I came on there were no less than five full references to Dreger under different names trying to hid that she said it , misidentifying gay magazines as LGBT, Bailey sources writing reviews of the same book that they appear in ! Unqualified reviewers who were Baileys collaborators . This article will never be honest or properly constructed. It should be about the book, not an apologists version of how Dr Bailey and his sainthood . Entire sections babbling on about Dregers "theories on the injustice to Bailey " and nothing on the book, or even to explain the IRB or what it meant to Dr Baileys approach to the research. After two years of trying to be neutral I totally lost neutrality so what's the point ? These aren't editors, they are Baileys sycophants and employees. Let them try to rewrite the truth, it will only delay the truth coming . Misplaced Pages is just a bunch of people enforcing their sourced point of view , it has nothing to do with fact. Thanks though. DarlieB (talk) 23:44, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Road....
Do you have proof that is actually him? Anyone can create an account claiming to be anyone. Also proof you have anything to do with FG? CTJF83 chat 16:30, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I posted my IMDB credits for having worked on this episode. DarlieB (talk) 18:28, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Road to the Multiverse. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Grsz 20:47, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- I have provided reference to the reversions and proof I am indeed who I say I am. Have me blocked and I will simply appeal. I have no problem proving I am the animator on this film.DarlieB (talk) 21:06, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- DarlieB, I think that what CTJF83 means is "How does this link prove that Misplaced Pages's User:DarlieB is Darlie Brewster, the animator?" For all CTFJ83 knows, that link has been there for months, and the presence of his name in the URL is purely coincidental, or that you've created tinybun as part of an elaborate internet-wide hoax in which you pretend to be the animator, or perhaps proof that you've somehow hacked into the "real" DarlieB's website. I don't think these are particularly reasonable interpretations, but those are several possible beliefs.
- The usual solution for real name/real identity debates is to send e-mail from an official/employer account to info-en@wikimedia.org, since most employees have their real name in their corporate e-mail addresses. The WP:OTRS folks can then post a message here (or wherever asked) to confirm your identity (without disclosing your e-mail address). I don't know whether that will work for you, since independent artists tend not to have corporate addresses, but perhaps it will.
- However, even establishing your true identity isn't going to solve the problem: Misplaced Pages is based on what's written in reliable sources, not on the on-wiki recollections of the people involved. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:14, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- What does that prove? That you can find a rough draft edit online? CTJF83 chat 20:51, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- Oh really ? Where did I get it from I wonder? Notice the time machine is in Stewies hand and not in his back pocket , that there is no dialogue , just the cycles . Show me where this is online and how come it's named after you genius ? Lol! DarlieB (talk) 21:06, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- I don't care who you are, that doesn't mean you just get to put whatever you want in and claim it's true because you drew it. If you wish to contribute here, please read WP:RS and WP:OR. Grsz 21:10, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
- Oh really ? Where did I get it from I wonder? Notice the time machine is in Stewies hand and not in his back pocket , that there is no dialogue , just the cycles . Show me where this is online and how come it's named after you genius ? Lol! DarlieB (talk) 21:06, 3 October 2009 (UTC)