Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Whaleto (talk | contribs) at 16:05, 18 December 2005 (→[]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Medical controversies

Turn into a real list of current, serious controversies or delete - as it stands, it's useless. QEDquid 15:20, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete but allow a new page to be created with same name. Alternately, Rewrite article to be a list of actual medical controversies (for example, include mention of the Angel of death) Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 17:18, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Okay, I meant the guy that killed a lot of terminally ill people and was charged with murder. That guy. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 17:19, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
    • Presumably you were referring to Jack Kevorkian, a.k.a. Doctor Death. •DanMS 01:38, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep The article is a stub, but with potential. Expand it! --JWSchmidt 17:37, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• keep: A hub for sorting through the breadth of such articles is needed. Ombudsman 19:00, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete or rewrite into article format. A list cannot do the subject justice. Durova 20:37, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Comment. Needs to be rewritten to be useful and has the potential to be a magnet for original research. Capitalistroadster 21:10, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - The controversies listed aren't even real, just pseudoscience cruft. This is just a vehicle for POV-pushing. --Cyde Weys _talk 21:35, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. While the article as it stands is not worth much, this topic has the potential to become an interesting and informative list as the focal point, or a kind of directory for many other topics, such as MMR vaccine, homeopathy, and even acupuncture. This article should probably be a List of... type article, simply pointing to all of the associated articles, where the associated topics are more thoroughly discussed. No more than a brief description of each topic would be required on this page. •DanMS 23:18, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: impossible to maintan relevant and unbiased content over time. If such articles are intented as honey pot for warriors I am all for it, otherwise get rid of it. Pavel Vozenilek 00:54, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: "controversies" is not useful for categorization. Billbrock 05:04, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. This is about external attacks on the current medical paradigm, not the numerous controversies within medical science. It is already becoming a list of pseudocontroversies. JFW | T@lk 12:34, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. A real Pandora's box, so great to take the lid off. Scary for the physicians. john 16:05, 18 December 2005 (UTC)