Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hutch48 (talk | contribs) at 00:10, 6 January 2010 (←Created page with 'I wonder as to the purpose of preparing to trash an article that is less than 12 hours old when its contents are simply a technical matter. I started the page, adde...'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

I wonder as to the purpose of preparing to trash an article that is less than 12 hours old when its contents are simply a technical matter. I started the page, added the minimum description of the new assembler and made REFERENCE to the authors own site which contains the technical data supporting the minimum level description. Then I bothered to look up the technical data that comes with the assembler to do the versioning history.

The notion that an encyclopaedia can only be constructed on seconds hand opinion is flawed in technical terms, there is no reason to assume that there is a body of second hand opinion that knows enough about the subject to say anything useful.

Almost exclusively the PROOF rather than nonsense notions of citation to external data that has no garantee of reliability is written in assembler code. Now this generates yet another problem in that the formatting capacity in Misplaced Pages is designed around formatted text which makes posting code example PROOF difficult to do properly as the results look appalling on the release page.

I made the effort to try and suppoort Misplaced Pages in an area where it is seriously lacking and the result is someone slapped a pile of FUCKING GRAFFITI all over the page when it was less than a day old. A page of this type takes a reasonable amount of work to get it all up and going and having to shovel through a mountain of sh*t is the best reason I can think of to not bother.

My approach is simple, if someone here deletes it, you can write the FUCKING THING yourself.

Hutch48 (talk) 00:10, 6 January 2010 (UTC)