This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GamerPro64 (talk | contribs) at 14:17, 29 May 2010 (→Already Gone (Kelly Clarkson song): Still a dead link). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:17, 29 May 2010 by GamerPro64 (talk | contribs) (→Already Gone (Kelly Clarkson song): Still a dead link)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Already Gone (Kelly Clarkson song)
Already Gone (Kelly Clarkson song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Matthewedwards : Chat 22:52, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
I am nominating this for featured article because...
I've worked on the article for many months, since around July or August of last year. The subject is a song by Kelly Clarkson, the first winner of American Idol, but don't let that put you off! It's a very nice song (honest -- you can even play a clip to hear for yourself), and it has a bit of a "you stole this" story behind it. I'm confident the article meets all four FA criteria. Thanks for reviewing, Matthewedwards : Chat 22:52, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - There's no dabs and there are three dead links in the article. GamerPro64 (talk) 23:13, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
- That's a pain. It looks like Rolling Stone recently revamped their site. Is http://uk.real.com/music/artist/Kelly_Clarkson/articles/395169/-related-articles-page-1/ okay as a replacement for one?
- http://www.rollingstone.com/home/search?cat=All&searchText=%22the+video+itself+is+boring+stuff%22&x=0&y=0 shows a replacement page for the other, except the link isn't working right now. I'll see if it fixes itself over the coming days.
- I fixed the third one.
- Thanks for bringing these to my attention :) Matthewedwards : Chat 01:10, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
- For the the first link, I don't know if its a reliable source. For the second link, one can hope that it will be corrected or something. GamerPro64 (talk) 01:48, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
- OK, well if someone else can tell me, that'd be great. It is from RealNetworks, but I don't know what our rules are when they're re-using a review. They have at least credited it to Rolling Stone, though. Matthewedwards : Chat 03:29, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oh - and I've just found out that RealNetworks own the rollingstone.com website, so it shouldn't be a problem. Matthewedwards : Chat 03:35, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
- Rollingstone.com works now, so I've updated that url. Must have been a temporary glitch. I've also replaced the other one with the real.com url. No more dead links. Happy happy, joy joy!! Matthewedwards : Chat 03:49, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, no. There's still a dead link in the article. GamerPro64 (talk) 14:17, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
- OK, well if someone else can tell me, that'd be great. It is from RealNetworks, but I don't know what our rules are when they're re-using a review. They have at least credited it to Rolling Stone, though. Matthewedwards : Chat 03:29, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
- For the the first link, I don't know if its a reliable source. For the second link, one can hope that it will be corrected or something. GamerPro64 (talk) 01:48, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
Resolved comments from Tbhotch 05:14, 29 May 2010 (UTC) |
---|
*Comment
I reviewed the article, some problems are:
Number -> number. Tbhotch 02:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
Some problems on the article, after all this is a good work. Tbhotch 00:30, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
|
- Support Problems fixed. Tbhotch 05:05, 29 May 2010 (UTC)