Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 69.145.215.206 (talk) at 03:19, 27 February 2006 (account unjustly blocked - please resolve). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

User talk:Essjay/Sandbox2
User:Essjay/Header
User talk:Essjay/Top User:Essjay/Directory

Big Spring, Texas

Wow. Quite an RFC, eh? Happyjoe appears to be using anonymizing proxies to hit the page from IPs all over the world; do you think semiprotection is in order? Thanks for your help. OhNoitsJamie 07:14, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Great minds think alike; I just sprotected it. If you catch any other socks, tag them as {{sockpuppet|Ohnoitsjayme}} so everything will match. Hopefully, now that he can't edit the RfC, he'll go away, but if not, we have plenty of people around to block him. Essjay 07:17, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

I have discovered that my account "Happyjoe" is blocked from editing due to some sort of misunderstanding over the Big Spring, TX article. Please remove this block so that I may complete necessary editing on other articles. Thank you for your timely assistance in resolving this problem... Happyjoe 69.145.215.206 03:19, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Proxies

Ah yes, I wasn't aware that was actually a proxy. I'm very curious...how did you know I blocked that address? You must be sitting somewhere with a monitor open...I think you can double to be a computer engineer as well? :-) --129.97.229.23 10:45, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

I assume you're HappyCamper logged out; yeah, I'm watching that page, since it's become a list of open proxies. I'm scanning them as I see them and blocking them indef. Essjay 10:47, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

86.10.231.219 blocking

You blocked the above user. Can you supply the page blanking, addition of random text, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, you mentioned? I am curious about these sort of trangressions, and was observing his actions, so would like to see the examples. Thanks. john 11:08, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Removing comments from AN/I, as well as his harassment of User:Thsgrn. Essjay 11:11, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

The block you have imposed is unwarranted at best, and not at all conducive to resolving the root problem, which is the suppression of content on a number of medical articles by users who constantly push the edge of the envelope. Please consider taking a less authoritarian approach to resolving the matter, rather than condoning the problematic behavior of those who relentlessly dismantle content that does not strictly adhere to the dogma of medical orthodoxy. Ombudsman 12:06, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

I suggest you raise the issue on AN/I; I stand behind my block of an IP address that was caught redhanded removing commentary from AN/I and harassing other contributors. Essjay 12:09, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Could you please provide a link specifically of the alleged deletion? You have removed a valid notice board posting and deleted relevant discussion from the anon's talk page, so it seems that you have engaged in exactly the kind of behavior that you describe as 'red handed'. Your unilateral decision to block the anon clearly takes sides with editors engaged in a wide ranging, disruptive campaign to delete broad swaths of content, contributed to provide reasonable balance to a number of medical articles. An example of the type of imbalance that is being enforced can be observed at the anti-vaccinationists article, an ill-conceived distraction that has been proffered as a subsitute for the deleted vaccine critics article. Your recent entry into this larger debate would be more welcome if you would use your admin privileges in a more even handed manner. Ombudsman 13:10, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Neoconservatism - My confusion

Hi. Sorry for my confusion, I will take your advice. Thanks. Enjoy your long weekend. --Cberlet 13:04, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Undelete

Hi, cloud you get this undeleted? Your and administrator, and I don't know who else to turn to. The Republican 20:49, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Never mind, it got undeleted. The Republican 22:34, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Association of Members Advocates

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Association_of_Members%27_Advocates This is the mediation group I am involved with. Not yours. The mediation advice I gave was an INFORMAL MEDIATION ONLY, the first level of mediation. See Misplaced Pages: Conflict Resolution. Cameronian 10:14, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Have fun!

Hey Essjay, enjoy your trip, make sure it is a safe one! KnowledgeOfSelf 12:26, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Psst

Check out this page. Pass it along. Nudge nudge. -- evrik 17:15, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Mediation

Hello, Essjay. I was referred to you by Thames because you are currently mediating a dispute over the Neoconservatism article. I also have issues with Jacrosse concerning the French Turn and Max Shachtman articles, and I have requested mediation for the former. I'm not sure if you'd want take on mediation considering your previous experience with the Neoconservativism dispute, but I thought I'd give you a heads-up. Thanks --metzerly 18:27, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

wow

I'm new on wikipedia. I can make an article, and add links and pictures--but thats it. From seeing your talk page, irealize you really know what you're doing. Could you tell me if there's a page about how to get started (aside from all the introduction pages, which I already know.

Thanks, Theonlyedge 00:35, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Hello! I will meet you on your talk page. Kd4ttc 05:11, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

IBS Informal mediation

(I have posted the following to Kd4ttc, just letting you know what has been said) Any member of Misplaced Pages is entitled to act as a mediator in any case, whether they are a member of a comittee or not. If you look carefully under informal mediation, you will see that anybody is entitled to come in and give an opinion on the matter. I was approached, as far as I was aware, to give this sort of informal mediation, not to act as an advocate. There was no need at the time for a formal mediation or advocacy, as rules and policy had been broken, therefore the changes sarastro made were valid, and the revertions were not. However, due to the events which later transipred, I found it necessary to start a more formal mediation, again, something which any user who has no involvment in the article itself has the right to do. I also considered the reverts to be bordering on vandalism, as I have a qualifications in both biology and medical ethics, and I saw sarastro's edits as useful to people who had the condition or were researching the condition. I hope a satisfactory conclusion can be drawn from this mediation, and that all users will be able to work together to produce a high quality article. This will be my final comment until you (Kd4ttc) recieve a reply from the co-ordinators of the mediation and advocacy comittees. Thank You. Cameronian 11:49, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

User page

Hi Essjay. That user page is great! If you could move it in when you're back, that'd be great. If you want to merge the histories, that'd be especially cool, but that might take a while, I suppose! I hope you've had a good weekend. Cheers, Sam Korn 20:38, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

A note from the Admin Coaching coordinator

Hello, coaches. As you can see, there is a significant backlog at the Esperanza Admin Coaching program. Since we do not want users to have to wait forever to get assigned, I'm asking all of you for a status report. If you feel that you are done, that your coachee is not active enough, or that you could handle the extra load from another coachee, please tell me in my talk page as soon as possible. Thanks! Titoxd 06:43, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

About your email

I felt like it, I would have rather done it to the Fat Joe article. :)