Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/TimidGuy ban appeal/Workshop

< Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration | Requests | Case | TimidGuy ban appeal

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by PaoloNapolitano (talk | contribs) at 20:08, 1 January 2012 (→Disproportionate relation between evidence and proposals against WillBeback: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 20:08, 1 January 2012 by PaoloNapolitano (talk | contribs) (→Disproportionate relation between evidence and proposals against WillBeback: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Main case page (Talk) — Evidence (Talk) — Workshop (Talk) — Proposed decision (Talk)

Case clerk: TBD Drafting arbitrator: TBD

Misplaced Pages Arbitration

About arbitration Talk Arbitration policy (CU/OS) Guide to arbitration Noticeboard + Talk Search archived proceedings Ban appeals Report
Open proceedings All open requests Case requests Clarification and Amendment requests Arbitrator motion requests Enforcement requests
Active sanctions Contentious topics (Log) General sanctions Editor sanctions
Arbitration Committee Discuss + Contact Members Procedures Elections Talk History Clerks + Talk Clerk procedures Conflict of interest reports
Audit Talk Statistics Talk Reports (pre-2016)

Track related changes
v t e

Behaviour on this page: Arbitration case pages exist to assist the Arbitration Committee in arriving at a fair, well-informed decision. You are required to act with appropriate decorum during this case. While grievances must often be aired during a case, you are expected to air them without being rude or hostile, and to respond calmly to allegations against you. Accusations of misbehaviour posted in this case must be proven with clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all). Editors who conduct themselves inappropriately during a case may be sanctioned by an arbitrator or clerk, without further warning, by being banned from further participation in the case, or being blocked altogether. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or clerks, will be met with sanctions. Behaviour during a case may also be considered by the committee in arriving at a final decision.

Deadlines extensions

Per request from drafting arbitrator User:Roger Davies, the deadline for evidence submission is extended to 23:59 (UTC) 2 January 2012. Consequently the workshop deadline and proposed decision date are also extended to 9 January and 16 January respectively. --Alexandr Dmitri (talk) 06:04, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Disproportionate relation between evidence and proposals against WillBeback

Several users have made proposals against WillBeback in multiple paragraphs, however, only one user, who has written one paragraph has presented evidence against WillBeback. Paolo Napolitano 20:08, 1 January 2012 (UTC)