Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 84.119.94.204 (talk) at 12:00, 7 March 2012 (Undid revision 458689081 identified as WP:VAND. Stop your edit wars, FleetCommand. Your talk page and talk page archive are FULL of entries calling you out for edit warring ! Stop. You know the consequences.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to my discussion page! Leave me a message You may leave a message. I will answer here and will let you know on your talk page using the {{Talkback}}. Do I have message on your talk page? You may leave me a notice here with {{Talkback}}.

Archives

Template:Multicol Pre-2010 1 Template:Multicol-break 2010 2 Template:Multicol-break 2011 3 4 Template:Multicol-end

Re: September 2011

You wrote:

"...but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Windows Search, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Misplaced Pages:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. P.S. Please do not use second person ("you") in Misplaced Pages articles. "

I'm just seeing your note 'now', (is there a way to have wiki send you an email when someone sends you a personal note or edits your user page?)...

What part of the material I wrote do you need more references on besides the length discussion of the problems I wrote about at the bottom of my text?

There are MANY complaints about this. But it's also documented in the help in windows 7: under 'Libraries: frequently asked questions' (comments in brackets are my paraphrase of what was said (1st line), or comments).

. "A network folder can only be included in a library if the content of the folder has been added to the search index. If the folder is already indexed on the device where it's stored, you should be able to include it directly in the library.

If the network folder is not indexed, an easy way to index it is to make the folder available offline. This will create offline versions of the files in the folder and add these files to the search index on your computer. After you make a folder available offline, you can include it in a library.

When you make a network folder available offline, copies of all the files in that folder will be stored on your computer's hard disk. Take this into consideration if the network folder contains a large number of files.

To make a folder available offline While connected to the network, locate the network folder that you want to make available offline.

Right-click the folder, and then click Always available offline.

The Always available offline command

Notes If you don't see the Always available offline command in the right-click menu for a network folder, you might be using an edition of Windows 7 that doesn't support offline files. [If you aren't using windows Professional or Ultimate you are screwed! (source: personal knowledge and checked @ http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows7/products/compare?T1=tab15)]

If the network folder you're trying to include is stored on a computer that's running an older version of Windows, you might be able to make it compatible with Windows 7 libraries by installing Windows Search 4.0 on the computer, and then indexing it. For more information about Windows Search 4.0, see the Windows Search website.

Is including the above copyrighted, hard to reference material what is needed for attribution? It's not like I can hyperlink to a MS-help chapter... Athena (talk) 01:23, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Re: Orphaned non-free image File:Personyze logo.jpg

mabdul 22:09, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

whine back?!

OH WOW.... I think I got it! Should I remove my above note? an put it back on my page?? Or rather would you prefer it? No prob!... Astara Athenea (talk) 02:38, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Consumerization page

Hi There, I would like to help solve any issues with this page. Can you please let me know exactly how to work out each individual item in your list? Thank you. Cesare. CesareGarlati @ cal.berkeley.edu

Hi, Cesare. Did you check Talk:Consumerization? I believe you find the explanation that I gave there useful. You can maintain the discussion there, so that others can help too.

Regards, Fleet Command (talk) 13:35, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Brosix for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brosix is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Brosix (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 11:12, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Someone is trying to delete a page

Hello,

I saw that you did many times tidying and cleaning of this page: Brosix

Someone is trying to delete it.

This article is on Misplaced Pages for more than 2 years. There are 24 external references talking about Brosix. Many people contributed to this article in the last 2 years.

What should we do to keep it?

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stefanch2 (talk • contribs) 10:20, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi.

Two words: Misplaced Pages:Notability

Regards, Fleet Command (talk) 18:02, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Re: disambig ATI

ATI currently redirects to ATI Technologies. However, that company no longer exists as such since 2007, and indeed the brand has also been obsoleted since 2010. The linked article doesn't include the history of the brand since 2006, so I'm disambiguating references to the term "ATI" so it's clearer what is meant. Eventually, we may be able to change where ATI points to. I'll note this at Talk:ATI too, thanks for reminding me. --Joy (talk) 19:28, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Move revert

I just reverted your move of SkyDrive to Windows Live SkyDrive. The reverse move was just made in December with this rationale:

In some areas of the Microsoft website etc. it's being called Microsoft SkyDrive, sometimes it's being called Windows Live SkyDrive, and sometimes just SkyDrive. So SkyDrive is the best name as there is no confusion. See http://www.liveside.net/2011/12/08

Please start an RM if you'd still like to move it. – Pnm (talk) 17:49, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

I knew that it was moved and I reverted it today. But what I didn't know was that you have also joined the rank of edit warriors and respond revert with counter-revert. (Or have you always been and it is a mistake on my part that I remember you as a good Wikipedian?) Seriously, what gives you the right to revert and denies me such a right? Fleet Command (talk) 18:20, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I didn't realize you knew. Your edit summary didn't indicate that you had seen the page history, and I assumed you hadn't. Several weeks have passed then, so I didn't think of your move a revert or mine a counter-revert. I started a move discussion here. – Pnm (talk) 02:44, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, huh? Well, I believe you; although you obviously knew that the article have twice been renamed forth and back and that a revert is most probably controversial. Still, I am not going to involve myself further in this matter, so you might like to delete your move request. (No pressure.) If there is any consolation, I am also sorry for my MOS:TITLE mistake. It is WP:TITLE, not MOS:TITLE. I thought these two pages were merged. Fleet Command (talk) 15:24, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Windows Live Essentials.PNG

Thanks for uploading File:Windows Live Essentials.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:20, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. I always wanted to remove this image but I always feared someone might insult. Fleet Command (talk) 11:10, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

inre Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ground Control (film)

I believe your major concerns with Ground Control (film) have been addressed. I'm still slogging through the non-English sources, but in addressing WP:NOEFFORT concerns, the article is undergoing improvement and now offers our readers something more than a does IMDB. Schmidt, 20:10, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

You are right. Regards, Fleet Command (talk) 02:29, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Features new to Windows 7 article: IExecuteCommand

I have reinserted the info about IExecuteCommand, added a ref and made it non-geeky. If Your Highness may permit that. - xpclient 09:56, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Windows Server 2003, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Firewall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:37, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

User:FleetCommand makes edit wars

As you can see he is using your username. I have reported this at Usernames_for_administrator_attention. Please make your comment there. /\ talk← Aviyal →Policy) /\ 12:26, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Much appreciated. Fleet Command (talk) 05:45, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Ground Control: Dark Conspiracy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cardinal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. When you recently edited Microsoft OneNote, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page App Store (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Toddst1 (talk) 06:44, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on File:Microsoft Office 2010 Logo.svg??. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

--178.140.28.172 18:21, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring

I'm on your side here, but still, stop. You know the consequences. user: Island Monkey 15:31, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Again, please DO NOT attack me

I want you to stop attacking my editing habits on Talk:Windows MultiPoint Server. Please redact your comment. Deleting notices of things like this as "vandalism" is frowned at. Jasper Deng 21:33, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

FleetCommand, stop vandalizing wikipedia pages and engaging in edit wars

Please do not add previously removed maintenance templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Media Data Extended, without giving a valid reason for your action in the edit summary. Your re-adding of the removed template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you.

Please stop. Continuing to add previously removed maintenance templates from pages on Misplaced Pages and engaging in edit wars may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing Misplaced Pages.

For the rest, I agree with Geewhiz (previous entry): "Why have you reversed my edits? Is nobody allowed to copyedit it? Is nobody allowed to add links? Is nobody allowed to add new sources and material? Whose interests are these edits in conflict with? I would very much appreciate an explanation of what you think is wrong. From what I understand, Misplaced Pages is a collaborative effort. Commanding the fleet is not what it's about. You are a foot soldier here, along with the rest of us. --Geewhiz (talk) 12:49, 15 September 2011 (UTC)"
--85.127.135.54 (talk) 06:26, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Stop your edit wars, FleetCommand. Your talk page and talk page archive are FULL of entries calling you out for edit warring ! Stop. You know the consequences. --85.127.218.223 (talk) 07:55, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

You have 2 choices:
(A) You acknowledge the issue and promise to refrain from such action in the future.
(B) You don't address this issue and remove this message. But it will be coming back, no matter how often you remove it.
--84.119.85.218 (talk) 14:33, 2 November 2011 (UTC)