This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fp cassini (talk | contribs) at 17:56, 4 August 2012 (→not a sentence: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:56, 4 August 2012 by Fp cassini (talk | contribs) (→not a sentence: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Albums B‑class | |||||||
|
Dead external links to Allmusic website – January 2011
Since Allmusic have changed the syntax of their URLs, 1 link(s) used in the article do not work anymore and can't be migrated automatically. Please use the search option on http://www.allmusic.com to find the new location of the linked Allmusic article(s) and fix the link(s) accordingly, prefereably by using the {{Allmusic}} template. If a new location cannot be found, the link(s) should be removed. This applies to the following external links:
--CactusBot (talk) 10:13, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Removal of Reviews section as per: Template:Infobox_album#Professional_reviews
| Reviews =
- Allmusic link
- The Austin Chronicle link
- Entertainment Weekly (B+) link
- Kerrang! 05/09/1998
- Robert Christgau (A-) link
- Rolling Stone link
- Spin (8/10) 06/01/1995
I will use these in the critical recpetion section at some point soon - I am in the middle of a massive rework of the Version 2.0 article. --Breakinguptheguy (talk) 20:29, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
not a sentence
At the beginning of the Promotion section, it sez: "The entire visual campaign for Version 2.0 was tailored to play off the album cover artwork, the icons designed to represent each single release, provided point-of-sale and the band's videogenic sensibility." This is not a sentence, and I couldn`t make enuf sense of it to turn it into one. Fp cassini (talk) 17:56, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Categories: