Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 87.232.1.48 (talk) at 12:27, 23 February 2013 (→Slanderous accusations). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This user may sometimes share an IP address with Flyer22.

I'm my own man. Don't judge me on my sister's contributions. I will be making a name for myself here.

Lesbian sexual practices

Well, I'm not a sockpuppet and I find the added reference valid. If there's no reason to remove it other than being added by a sockpuppet, it can stay there because I added it. Diego (talk) 14:14, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the swift reply to my comment. I see your point. You adding it back is not much different than my sister adding it back. And at least he kept his word not to remove the reliably sourced information that he was removing before. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 14:19, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

I don't think of this as you supporting him either. I apologize for that wording in my heading to you. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 14:21, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Halo Jerk1, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Halo Jerk1! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Jodi Arias trial for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jodi Arias trial is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jodi Arias trial until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Youreallycan 09:30, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Okay, cool. I thought it may be deleted, but I couldn't resist creating it. It has a high chance of being recreated later on anyway. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 09:32, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jodi Arias trial, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HLN (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Why are you so obsessed with me?

I simply took out the LGBT bias known to frequent your sister's topics. In a battle of truth vs. LGBT bias, I stand with truth. But I know where you stand. And seriously, stop being obsessive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.161.117.25 (talk) 05:53, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Bias my ass. And your assumption that's she's LGBT when she works on all kinds of sexual topics is ridiculous! And I'm not obsessed with you at all. It's the other way around, which is why you took the time to reply and out yourself (pun intended). Thanks for taking the bait. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 05:57, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Well I would have reminded/suggested to your sister that the other topic needed the additional source as well, but I decided to do it myself instead of bother her with reminders. And yes you do seem to be obsessed but we shall agree to disagree. Have a nice day. I don't wish to war with you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.161.117.25 (talk) 06:01, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Okay, fine. I guess I can call a truce, as long as you don't go back to the same kind of destructive editing you did before. I'm not obsessed with you or my sister, but I do appreciate the work she does and don't like to see it unjustifiably wrecked. I had decided to keep an eye out for you because you had edited destructively before. Peace. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 06:07, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Seriously, chill down a bit. I know you're concerned, but you'll end up getting blocked for WP:CIVIL if you're not careful. Inb4 someone else - Alison 18:22, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

I just revdeled that edit summary -- if you must swear multiple times, and in capital letters, please DON'T do it somewhere it's not possible to rephrase.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:42, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Forgive me for not replying in a more timely fashion, when that madness was taking place. I don't curse much, mainly while playing online video gaming. I apologize and will try not to let it happen again. Is cursing not allowed here? I've seen others curse at this site when upset. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 21:42, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

He's now commenting on my sister at WP:ANI. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 22:21, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

STOP. Ignore the ip. Let an admin block him if he is indeed committing puppetry. Don't give him any satisfaction. WP:DENY  little green rosetta(talk)
central scrutinizer  22:50, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

His groundless comment about my sister will still be there if someone doesn't remove it each time. He keeps coming back like a cockroach. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 22:52, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Ignore it. Let others remove it for you.  little green rosetta(talk)
central scrutinizer  22:56, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Who's going to remove it for me? If others only block, I'll do the removing. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 22:57, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

I will keep an eye on it. I've also contacted an admin via IRC over this issue. User:The Blade of the Northern Lights blocked the ip user and will monitor ANI for this diff as well.  little green rosetta(talk)
central scrutinizer  23:04, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

I saw your revert. Thanks. But if his comment ever stays for too long, I'll revert. Halo Jerk1 (talk) 23:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

You've got mail!

  little green rosetta(talk)
central scrutinizer  23:11, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Slanderous accusations

You wrote in the page talk for Killing of Travis Alexander: "I also wonder if MaxxFordham and 87.232.1.48 are the same person." a number of times. I have no affiliation with this user so if you spread baseless and unfounded accusations I will take action next time. EDIT: In fact it was BabbaQ who has been blocked for abuse of multiple accounts and socketpuppeting. -- http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/BabbaQ/Archive 87.232.1.48 (talk) 12:27, 23 February 2013 (UTC)