This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Danlaycock (talk | contribs) at 04:45, 12 May 2013 (→Stop labeling information you don't like as copyrighted material: sp). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:45, 12 May 2013 by Danlaycock (talk | contribs) (→Stop labeling information you don't like as copyrighted material: sp)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| This is Danlaycock's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9Auto-archiving period: 31 days  |
The source is very clear Serbia says Kosovo is eligible for EU
EU is for independent countries! http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/19/us-serbia-kosovo-eu-idUSBRE93I0IB20130419 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qwerty786 (talk • contribs)
- No they haven't. Please read the discussion at Talk:International_recognition_of_Kosovo#Erm.2C_brace_yourselves_for_the_eS_to_hit_the_fan... and get a consensus before continuing to add this disputed content to the article. TDL (talk) 17:22, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
- Please follow this, i am afraid that it must be reported. But i dont have any time, please you do it. I am off wiki... --WhiteWriter 17:41, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Unhappy with your Domination!
Romania has dropped their 2015 goal as it is untenable. I don't know what supporting documentation you are talking about as I have not found it but the documantation within this article supports dropping the 2015 goal as I have indicated. Please see my reference which you have deleted for proof of the new goal for Lithuania. I dont's think you should have exclusive rights to change other peoples work if you cannot substantiate it. Briefzehn — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julien Houle (talk • contribs) 21:28, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- The source I'm using as a reference is the one at the very top of the column in the template: . It still lists these old dates. I'm not sure which source you're referring to, as I've never deleted any that you added. Just because a country has admitted that their target date is no longer realistic, doesn't mean that it isn't still formally their "official target date". And while Lithuania has an unofficial goal of 2015, there is no evidence that this is their official "national target date". Until we have sources to show that the "official target date" have changed, we should keep the old dates. I'm certainly not trying to dominate the article, I simply disagree with your change. You're welcome to start a discussion on the talk page, or follow one of the steps at WP:DR such as seeking a WP:3O, if you disagree. TDL (talk) 22:03, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Stop labeling information you don't like as copyrighted material
Stop labeling information you don't like as copyrighted material. That one sentence you edited out is not copyrighted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilaljshahid (talk • contribs) 03:53, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- It has nothing to do with whether I "like" the material or not. The issue is that you've WP:PLAGiarised the text from . That's a WP:COPYVIO. If you continue to add the plagiarised content to the article, I'll be forced to report you, and you will likely be blocked. TDL (talk) 03:58, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- The sentence you are editing out does not appear anywhere in the article you linked to as the "source". It is not plagiarised content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilaljshahid (talk • contribs) 04:03, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- What you wrote:
- "...makes sense for a country with limited nuclear resources and limited capability to fight a conventional war against a larger adversary not to renounce the option to use nuclear weapons first."
- What the source says:
- "...makes sense for a country with limited nuclear resources and limited capability to fight a conventional war against a larger adversary not to renounce the option to use nuclear weapons first."
- That's quite clearly been plagiarised. Plagiarised content is not allowed on wikipedia due to the possible legal implications. I'm going to remove it one more time, please don't restore it. If you do, I'll be forced to request administrator intervention at WP:ANI. TDL (talk) 04:10, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- What you wrote:
- The sentence you are editing out does not appear anywhere in the article you linked to as the "source". It is not plagiarised content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilaljshahid (talk • contribs) 04:03, 12 May 2013 (UTC)