This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Srich32977 (talk | contribs) at 17:40, 30 May 2013 (→Warning & ANI posting: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:40, 30 May 2013 by Srich32977 (talk | contribs) (→Warning & ANI posting: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
 Archives |
Biased comment
Your comment in my Talk page is ideologically biased, in extreme. You should edit taking the principal use of the term, that is market anarchism = anarcho-capitalism. --Sageo (talk) 04:14, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- With all due respect, it concerns me very little whether you believe me to be 'biased.' It concerns me a lot more whether what I'm saying is factually accurate. The evidence does not support your assumptions. Finx (talk) 04:58, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Original research template
The templates are justificated in talk page. Please use sources in talk page, not opinions. You shouldn't remove them until a consensus benn achieved. Another remove of template and I will denounce your attitude. I think we can dialogue without troubles, only you should avoid use Misplaced Pages as political forum, please. --Sageo (talk) 14:17, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- I told you about remove templates, I don't want to get to a critic point and have to denounce you. Better, continue discoussing in talk page. At least we get to an agreement of make a disambiguation page.--Sageo (talk) 15:35, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Warning & ANI posting
Posting the "level 4" edit warning message and bringing the issue to the ANI at the same time is not appropriate. 1. The heavy handed warning, posted without the lower level, more gentle warnings, was too much. Why? because 2. you brought the issue to the ANI. Warnings should serve to remind editors of guidelines, not serve as ammunition for an ANI discussion. We go to ANI only after warnings have failed to resolve the issue. Also, I suggest you look at other dispute resolution sources WP:3O would be a good one because only you and Sageo were involved in the discussion. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 17:40, 30 May 2013 (UTC)