This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bhludzin (talk | contribs) at 16:39, 5 June 2006 (moved Talk:Tallest buildings in Chicago to Talk:List of tallest buildings in Chicago: Standardization of naming - see List of buildings). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:39, 5 June 2006 by Bhludzin (talk | contribs) (moved Talk:Tallest buildings in Chicago to Talk:List of tallest buildings in Chicago: Standardization of naming - see List of buildings)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Why isnt the Sears Tower listed? POlsen 17:24, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
Trump
The list's name says "2004," yet Trump is scheduled to be complted in 2007. IF we're going to include Trump, then why not in parentheses? Kdammers 07:57, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
Proposed
I had to move the proposed structures out of the table (Misplaced Pages is not a crystal ball). Not only does it impede the utility of the table for current rankings, it's potentially wrong. Many things could happen -- construction accidents, financing collapses, terrorism, a steel shortage. That's not even counting new projects that could come to light in the next four years. So proposed/abuilding stuff should be handled separately (I'm not even sure about the table).--Dhartung | Talk 10:42, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Metres
I think that the building's height should be listed in metres as well as feet. It would be easy to convert the heights so no need to look each building up
- Done. The data comes from Emporis, so it is more accurate than a simple conversion. Here on Misplaced Pages all heights are rounded to the nearest foot, but if a height is between integers it might round to a different meter than if the rounded number were converted; by recording the data from Emporis (which is more precise than feet or meters) the meter heights will be rounded to the correct integer. Montalto 07:36, 2 June 2006 (UTC)