Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jim1138 (talk | contribs) at 07:11, 17 October 2013 (Lesbian 3RR). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Linemap, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Linemap! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Hajatvrc (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. STATic message me! 05:41, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Stop WP:Edit warring all over the place, first with STATicVapor at the Snoop Dogg article, now with me. I'm certain that you are not a new Misplaced Pages editor, despite this relatively inexperienced account you are editing under (for example, new Misplaced Pages editors don't state "copyedit" within their first few edits on Misplaced Pages), so you should know that the constant WP:Edit warring is not going to get you anywhere...but likely blocked. WP:Edit warring is policy, and if you want your WP:BOLD edit to remain, you should follow the Misplaced Pages:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (BRD) process; you were reverted, and it is your job to take the matter to the talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 07:09, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Lesbian shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jim1138 (talk) 07:11, 17 October 2013 (UTC)