This is an old revision of this page, as edited by TParis (talk | contribs) at 04:31, 21 July 2014 (→Image: :I beg to differ. It is a major ad campaign against drunk driving and you've tailored it to COI editing.--~~~~). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:31, 21 July 2014 by TParis (talk | contribs) (→Image: :I beg to differ. It is a major ad campaign against drunk driving and you've tailored it to COI editing.--~~~~)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| This is TParis's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 |
 | This administrator has volunteered for an administrator review. You may comment on his or her administrative actions at Misplaced Pages:Administrator review/TParis 2. |
| If you have come here to change my opinion, be ready to also change yours. |
| USER PAGE | TALK PAGE | CONTRIBUTIONS | AWARDS | DASHBOARD | RECALL | MOTIVES | POLITICS | RTRC |
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
UTRS review
Happy Fourth. I'm new (as you know :-)) to UTRS, but it looks like this may be a filter false-positive that's fallen through the cracks. Okay to unblock? All the best, Miniapolis 17:19, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
- None of us know the reason for the block and overturning checkuser blocks w/o good reason isn't a good thing to do. Waiting for RE to return.--v/r - TP 18:38, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
- Okay, and thanks for the advice. All the best, Miniapolis 00:09, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Figureofnine (talk • contribs) 19:18, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
COIN proposal
Hi TP, would you please comment on this? Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 21:21, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- I'm fine with the proposal as long as it is not used to harass editors as a polemic list. There needs to be some level of enforcement.--v/r - TP 21:52, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- I am so, so with you there. Thanks for replying. Jytdog (talk) 02:19, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Diplomacy |
| Thank you for your support of me during a recent situation regarding another editor. I really appreciate it, Daniellagreen 00:19, 12 July 2014 (UTC) |
@Daniellagreen: Just make sure to keep yourself on the straight and narrow and don't make any of us eat our words.--v/r - TP 00:46, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
- Lol, I always govern myself accordingly. Thanks again, Daniellagreen 00:58, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
Re:MH17
Thanks. Why is nothing ever simple? Reedy (talk) 19:21, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
- (shrug). I don't know. Thousands of different people from different parts of the world of different cultures is probably a contributing factor.--v/r - TP 19:27, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue C, July 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:47, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Image
Please restore the link and first sentence of my comment removed at . It is part of my comment: It is the first sentence. It is not a polemical statement meant to piss people off. There is no comparison with drunk driving. --Atethnekos (Discussion, Contributions) 04:23, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- I beg to differ. It is a major ad campaign against drunk driving and you've tailored it to COI editing.--v/r - TP 04:31, 21 July 2014 (UTC)