Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sitush (talk | contribs) at 10:41, 30 July 2015 (→July 2015: please stop making accusations such as this). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

July 2015

You said it, these guys carry a lot of inferiority complex and do these things, Keralopathy and travancore state manuals clearly mentions the noble ancestry of nairs.It is on the rise in particularly after the SNDP launched the "cyber army". I think the best way to fight it out legally for falsified claims — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alampallil panikker (talk • contribs) 16:08, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, I completely agree. However I don't think taking legal action is the best way to continue as we are the ones who are sticking to the truth. I have traced the statements these guys have made and they are written the opposite of what is on the manuals and sources. I think what we need to do is to ask them explicitly where they have found the statements. Nairs are not devil worshipping, meat eating tribals as said in the article and the lower caste people who vandalize the article have biased "evidence" to support this. The evidence we have is the fact that they abuse their blocks, break the three reversion rule, monitor our talk pages, and use biased sources which are even shown to be of unreliability. (https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view). We also know the true information fromm unbiased sources. Don't give up, and if you are constantly blocked, report it. Sorry that I didnt post it on your talk page as I cannot 'edit' things because of the block I have.Rabt man (talk) 18:34, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Ezhava without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sitush (talk) 14:50, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

You did in fact explain why but your rationale is nonsense. You most definitely have not looked at the sources in a proper manner if that is the conclusion you came to. - Sitush (talk) 14:51, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Sitush

Plz explain how rationale is nonsense.

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages. When you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:26, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nair. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sitush (talk) 07:00, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Seriously, you cant just threaten to block anyone whose edits you can't agree with. That's just nonsense. I've tried talking to you before, and just because you don't agree with my edits does not mean you can threaten to block me. Please be more mature on this topic, and let us talk to resolve your conflict.

Your recent editing history at Nair shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sitush (talk) 09:53, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

• You really should stop making accusations such as this also. I've told you already that I am "attacking" nothing and that my edits/style of contribution has been reviewed by many experienced contributors. - Sitush (talk) 10:41, 30 July 2015 (UTC)