This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tobias Conradi (talk | contribs) at 14:13, 3 September 2006 (ipa-0). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:13, 3 September 2006 by Tobias Conradi (talk | contribs) (ipa-0)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Request for new writing-system category: runes (ISO code runr)
Although I've previously discussed adding a userbox for runic literacy (in the Babelbox section), it seems more logical to list that skill under writing systems instead of languages. I see only a few problems with adding "runr-n" userboxes:
- No native level would apply, because almost nobody consistently uses runes (an ancient script) to write their native language.
- Some distinction between variants of the runic alphabet (Primitive Germanic vs. Saxon vs. Norse) might be useful. The ISO system, however, treats all runic scripts as a single block of Unicode: what kind of modifier should be added to "runr-n" to specify a variant alphabet?
--Ingeborg S. Nordén 00:25, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
ISO 15924 is Runr not runr. About variants you may ask User:Evertype who makes the codes. (nice to have him in WP). That currently nobody has Runr-N does not matter. I support the creation. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 01:16, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
User iso15924
instead of creating 100 userboces we could make Template:User iso15924 and then let people simply pass parameters. "{User iso15924|-ISO 15924-|-level-}" e.g. "{User iso15924|Cyrl|4}". Maybe an advanced template coder could do this. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 13:35, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
IMO the old boxes should than be only aliases. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 13:39, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
TfD and CfD
Level N and 5 are up for deletion Misplaced Pages:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_August_26#Category:Writing_systems_categories Tobias Conradi (Talk) 04:39, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
ipa-0
Can an admin state whether this was properly deleted, i.e. according to WP policies? was it marked for deletion? http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special:Log/delete&page=Template:User_ipa-0
I think ipa-0 can in fact be usefull since it is used in en:WP, as en-0 is usefull for languages in en:WP. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 14:13, 3 September 2006 (UTC)