This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Doug Weller (talk | contribs) at 05:21, 6 September 2016 (Caution: Unconstructive editing on David Irving. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:21, 6 September 2016 by Doug Weller (talk | contribs) (Caution: Unconstructive editing on David Irving. (TW))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)November 2013
Hello, I'm Andy Dingley. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Wankel engine because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Andy Dingley (talk) 21:52, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of James Grime for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Grime is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/James Grime until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:46, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
April 2014
Hello, I'm WadeSimMiser. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Zeno of Elea, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. WadeSimMiser 20:55, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Warning
This constitutes a personal attack. You are permitted to challenge admin actions, but you resorted to hyperbole and an accusation of fascism (ironic on the talk page of a holocaust denier). Guy (Help!) 13:05, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
March 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Guy (Help!) 13:18, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
per and WP:POINT. Guy (Help!) 13:21, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
April 2016
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for disruptive editing, and especially further WP:POINT violations: , . Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Nick-D (talk) 23:52, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
September 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at David Irving. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You knew you'd be reverted, you've tried this before. Doug Weller talk 05:21, 6 September 2016 (UTC)