User talk:KyleJoan - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Noodlefish96 (talk | contribs) at 01:41, 12 February 2018 (→The View). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 01:41, 12 February 2018 by Noodlefish96 (talk | contribs) (→The View)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome!

Hello, KyleJoan, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Cheers, L A X 10:37, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

January 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:09, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Your block expires and you go straight back to the same edit war! If you continue when this block expires, the next one will be even longer. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:11, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

I should also point out that there is no 24-hour revert allowance and you don't have to exceed three reverts to get yourself blocked. Frankly, I'm getting sick of the confrontational approach you two are showing towards to each other, and you'll be heading for an indef block if you don't tone it down - fighting should be left for inside the ring, and editing Misplaced Pages should be an altogether more cooperative approach. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:45, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

KyleJoan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise to unconditionally stop edit warring and discuss disagreements as well as seek second opinions before making bold edits and/or reverts. I intend to start this process as soon as possible and prove to the Misplaced Pages community that I can abide by rules at all costs and be a model editor. DantODB 04:45, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Accept reason:

OK, that sounds good enough, and your block record isn't so bad. You are now unblocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:43, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

@Boing! said Zebedee: Thank you so much! Cheers! 21:58, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

We both got lucky

We both got lucky here.

Let's agree to play nice...if you have an issue with an edit I make (be it "bold" or otherwise), address it with me first before you go right into revert mode, and I'll do the same for you.

Not every single edit needs to devolve into tit-for-tat, so let's both think before we dig our heels in, OK?

Too much "falling on the sword" just leads to bleeding to death.

Vjmlhds (talk) 21:50, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

@Vjmlhds: I agree. Just know that sometimes I do find your edits speculative and not reflecting the present and I will take it to you directly if it ever happens again. Also, I still haven't forgotten everything you've said about/to me as well as the subtle personal threats, so I'm not going to be overly chummy. Thanks. DantODB 21:56, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Not asking/don't want to be chummy, just saying we BOTH need to take a different approach, because the old way clearly wasn't working, and next time the admins may not be so nice. Vjmlhds (talk) 22:27, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

@Vjmlhds: Including times where you threaten me with a block, I might add. You have more to lose than I do. DantODB 22:29, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Which is why I'm saying we both have to do things different...me not being so aggressive and taking things personal, and you not being so quick to revert things. Vjmlhds (talk) 22:34, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

@Vjmlhds: Cool. DantODB 22:45, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

205 Live

Just so there are no misunderstandings, the note is just to let people know that the cruiserweights/205 Live roster are considered a part of Raw...never assume that everybody just automatically "gets it".

Vjmlhds (talk) 21:37, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

@Vjmlhds: Well, it is under Raw and the headline is smaller, so it's not an assumption, it just happens that it is already set that way. Let's take it to the talk page, then. DantODB 21:39, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

@Vjmlhds: Also, you just directly reverted an edit, which happened to be done by me. Just a reminder. DantODB 21:42, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

I realized I reverted...force of habit (I gotta watch myself). I also noticed another editor agreed with my reasoning for keeping the note on the article's talk page. The whole reason it's there is so people won't get any ideas to move the section. You can't just take for granted that people automatically know. Vjmlhds (talk) 22:26, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

@Vjmlhds: I think it's ironic that the point being made is that so people don't move the 205 Live into its own section and the last person that did that was you. Another user corrected your edit of making the 205 Live section its own brand and put it back under Raw on the personnel page. Just an observation. DantODB 22:56, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

You might wanna.....

You may wanna weigh in on this as you were the other editor who told them La Luchadora is not an official name. They are adding it to Lynch and Bliss now with a YouTube video for a source.Chris "WarMachineWildThing" 14:05, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

@WarMachineWildThing: Will do! DantODB 21:45, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

The whole thing is silly Chris "WarMachineWildThing" 23:44, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Edit-war issue

Hi DantODB,

I understand Vjmlhds has been doing edit-war on certain Misplaced Pages pages. Yes, he wrote something on my talk page and it is very disruptive of this person to write something like that. He turned the Antenna TV page into an edit-war on me. We all worked very hard revising and adding information onto Misplaced Pages pages. We do not deserved to be disruptive or disrespectful from that person. Cbears22 (talk) 23:53, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

hi. Looks like VJ will start a new edit war at the wwe roster. If he does, i will ask for a ban. Hos behaviour with other users is horrible and he starts edit wars frecuently. Do you know how should I procede?--HHH Pedrigree (talk) 20:36, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

HHH Pedrigree Don't bother...I'm not changing it back...doesn't mean I accept the version presented, but I can't tell people to be right if they aren't willing to listen. Vjmlhds (talk) 21:32, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

@HHH Pedrigree: I'm sure you can ask for a block on grounds of personal attacks. The whole talk page of the List of WWE personnel article is enough to get him blocked. Cheers! DantODB 23:42, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

New, referenced information has come out stating that HHH will be wrestling a decent bit leading up to WM 33. Like anything else in life, when new information comes out, things can change. You'd have more of a reason to be upset if I had changed things without the new info. The discussion from before was based on how things stood at the time of the discussion - now that new information has come to the surface, things have changed. Vjmlhds (talk) 20:50, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

@Vjmlhds: Then start a new discussion, especially since the information that came out wasn't anything that wasn't said in the previous discussion. Wrestling two live events does not constitute a role change. DantODB 20:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Diamante

Why do you move Diamante to Diamanté? Impact wrestling writes without accent. You created a mess. I'm from Spain and Spanish is my native language. In Spanish it's Diamante, never Diamanté. It's not like Patrón because in Spanish, Diamante isn't accentuated. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 09:19, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

A typo. It's Diamante, not Diamanté. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 10:11, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Don't worry. It's just I have to talk with everyone about the typo XD I told it to MPJ and it was like "what the hell, again?" XD The problem is I have to ask for a move now :s About La Luchadora, I think the ebst idea is to include more people in the conversation, ok? --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 10:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject Cheryl

Hi, DantODB! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Cheryl, a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Cheryl. Thanks and best regards! Linguist111 (away) (my main account) 08:35, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alexxis Nevaeh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eddie Edwards. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

Your recent editing history at Alexa Bliss shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Nickag989 08:11, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:DantODB reported by User:Nickag989 (Result: ). Thank you. Nickag989 08:39, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

3RR block

You've been blocked from editing for one week due to violating the Three revert rule. Please be more careful in the future. El_C 20:16, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Don't leave messages on my talk page

This is a friendly note please don't leave messages on my talk page I don't want anything to do with you, I'm not getting into a edit war with you so please leave me alone HardcoreWrestlingFan 18:02, 30 May 2017 (UTC) HardcoreWrestlingFan 18:02, 30 May 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by HardcoreWrestlingFan (talk • contribs)

WWE

No reason for Rock or All Red not to have made appearances. They're not "taking time off" you said.

i've wrote taking time off only for eva marie at WWE Personnel List on her inactivity. for the rock i wrote makes sporadic appearances not taking time off. he last seen in wrestlemania 32 but not seen. so i wrote "makes sporadoc appearances" but for eva marie(deceased person) i wrote "taking time off" as no body allows to edit a page Eva Marie due to Violation of BLP policy Violation. I've got blocked for 21 hours period for BLP violation and vandalism. Broken nutshell (talk) 19:23, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Page blanking

Please do not blank pages, as you did to Karmella (wrestler), whatever the reason. Somebody will come to Misplaced Pages, find a blank page and wonder what on earth is going on. If an article is a duplicate of another, then redirect it. If you feel that an article doesn't belong on Misplaced Pages, then look at the deletion policy. If it indeed meets the criteria for deletion in your judgement, then nominate it as appropriate. Thank you. — Smjg (talk) 06:25, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Lust for Life

Hi. Please keep the review box in album articles to 10. --Jennica✿ / 04:36, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Hey long time no talk, just so you know

About an hour ago WWE posted Asuka is no longer Champion. Not sure if you saw it or not. http://www.wwe.com/shows/wwenxt/article/asuka-relinquishes-nxt-womens-title Chris "WarMachineWildThing" 04:18, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Now you know as well as I do someone will fight and edit war that at some point because technically she dropped it today. Because that's how it done lol. We both know editors who fit that bill lol. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" 04:33, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

I'd let it be and not even worry about it at this point because either way it's right. Not worth the hassle of it turning into an edit war and the page getting locked down. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" 22:19, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Gail Kim

Gail Kim, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 09:45, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, DantODB. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ANI Experiences survey

The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:

https://wikimediafoundation.org/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.

Please be aware this survey will close Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC.

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Reliable sources

To keep you in touch with Reliable sources Instagram isn’t a source it’s a social media diva dirt hasn’t been proven to be reliable so that proved right there that your edits of Maria Kannellis are not reliable, secondly there were not edit warnings on my talk page and thirdly you wed to read up on sources for Misplaced Pages TheKinkdomMan (talk) 19:29, 5 February 2018 (UTC) TheKinkdomMan (talk) 19:29, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Mr DantODB let’s have a discussion on my talk page about Maria Kanellis-Bennett instead of waiting in administration I don’t wanna get blocked and I’m sure we can come up with a conclusion to this to solve this matter TheKinkdomMan (talk) 20:06, 5 February 2018 (UTC) TheKinkdomMan (talk) 20:06, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018

Your recent editing history at The View (talk show) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

== The View ==

Hello, there is nothing wrong with contributing to the critical response section or fixing and error but reverting that much editing requires consensus. Also you have gone over the 3 edit rule, any more edits and you will be blocked for edit warring. Noodlefish96 (talk) 01:41, 12 February 2018 (UTC)